User Tag List

Results 1 to 16 of 16

Thread: BG-65 Strings

  1. #1
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Hong Kong / Toronto
    Posts
    78
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default BG-65 Strings

    Question about the bg-65 strings. So i know it looses about 2lb. after the first few weeks. But will it keep on losing lbs.? for example if i strung it at 23, and it loses to 21, then will it keep losing its tension?

  2. #2
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    canada
    Posts
    71
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    yea. bg 65 is known as one of the worst strings because of its tension. It loses it very quickly

  3. #3
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Surabaya - Indonesia
    Posts
    836
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    no, at some point of tension i doubt it'll loose again

  4. #4
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    944
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I don't have any problem with BG65. I find it to be pretty good, in terms of feel and durability. Currently, I am using it on all my rackets. As for tension lost, I think it settles down after a few days.

  5. #5
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Calgary, Canada
    Posts
    909
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Usually after a couple weeks, it starts to decrease in smaller increments that don't get noticeable, also depends on stringer skill and how often you play, but usually after the first couple weeks, the strings settle down and decrease in smaller increments.

  6. #6
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Vancouver
    Posts
    594
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jseto View Post
    yea. bg 65 is known as one of the worst strings because of its tension. It loses it very quickly
    No it isn't...its known as one of the worst strings to those who don't know very much about the true side of BG65...at high tensions it is one of the best strings...it has awsome power and feel and control at 25+lbs, and when you string it, you're supposed to string it 2lbs higher, then it will stretch out and lose 2lbs then it says there until natural wear and tear makes it lose tension...
    Quote Originally Posted by BadFever View Post
    I don't have any problem with BG65. I find it to be pretty good, in terms of feel and durability. Currently, I am using it on all my rackets. As for tension lost, I think it settles down after a few days.
    Yea it's pretty damn nice as long as you string it 2lbs above your desired tension.

  7. #7
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    6,302
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    BG-65 is a very nice string. The key is to use a drop weight machine to take out the slacks.

  8. #8
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Surabaya - Indonesia
    Posts
    836
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jseto View Post
    yea. bg 65 is known as one of the worst strings because of its tension. It loses it very quickly
    that's why lindan use it
    mmmhhh .. worst string used by number 1 baddy player nowadays....
    now you still can say bg-65 is worst string??
    i say: string is preference for any player
    just add 2-3 pound when you strung, the problem solved then..

  9. #9
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Beijing,Guilin,K.L & Jakarta
    Posts
    3,988
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    BG65 is not good if u try to string it at low tension.But it works great above 25lbs,in terms of repulsion n control,n of course,durability.Add some 2 or 3 lbs from ur desired tension,then after it loses those 2 or 3,it'll stabilize.The problem may appears when ur desired tension is at for ex: 27 lbs,then u have to string ur racket at 29 or 30 lbs.U may afraid for breaking ur racket then..
    Last edited by Smichz; 09-27-2007 at 04:21 AM.

  10. #10
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    4,661
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    This is my take on BG-65. If you don't pre strech the string, you lost 1~2 lb just first 2 days. If you pre strech the string, BG65 will drop < 1 lb the next day or 2. It will drop about 1 lb after week. May be another lb after another week of playing. Then after about 2% per 2 weeks. It also depend on how often you play. Here is an example
    Strung @ 24 lb with pre strech and play total 6 hr per week.

    Day 2 - 23 lb
    Day 7 - 21.5 lb
    Day 14 - 21 lb
    Day 21 - 20.5 lb
    Day 28 - 20 lb
    Day 35 - 19.4 lb
    Day 42 - 18.9 lb
    Day 49 - 18.4 lb
    Day 59 - 18 lb

    At 18 lb, I would consider restring if you have not broken the string yet.

    PS: This is just a formula from my pass experience. Different for every user.

  11. #11
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    New Zealand - Indonesia
    Posts
    137
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    i usually break a string at week 4-5. ive always used 65. i string it at 29 but i left the racket unused for about a week. somehow i dont find it drop too much. perhaps would still be around 27 before i break it. reasonable price and all round string. good control, durability and repulsion. tried nanogy couple of times i still pref 65 but perhaps i havent got used to it as much as 65.

  12. #12
    Regular Member ants's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Malaysian Citizen of the World
    Posts
    13,157
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I dont have any problem with Bg65. I like the string .. probably due to high tension. I usually tension my racket at around 30-31 lbs. It is a good string for high tension. But no no for low tension.

  13. #13
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    6,302
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    I agree! It's a totally awesome string for high tension, >=30 lbs.

    Quote Originally Posted by ants View Post
    I dont have any problem with Bg65. I like the string .. probably due to high tension. I usually tension my racket at around 30-31 lbs. It is a good string for high tension. But no no for low tension.

  14. #14
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    944
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ants View Post
    It is a good string for high tension. But no no for low tension.
    I am the opposite of you. You should add that you are an advance player, close to Pro. Otherwise, I don't know what level I am in.
    The opposite of you is likely an oldman or beginner level like myself, BG65 at 19/20lbs suits me best. That's without pre-stretching and with a crank machine. I even have to wait for a week or two before I play my best with it(at best is still a beginner tho).

  15. #15
    New Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    940
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I never really liked BG-65, but my days of using BG-65 were when I just started and didn't want to spend more money on strings. Nowadays, I string at about 27 lbs. If I were to give them a try again, what should I string it at? Should it be at 29 lbs since you all say to string it 2 lbs higher than other strings?

  16. #16
    Regular Member george@chongwei's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    MIA
    Posts
    29,966
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    right now i`m using BG-65 strings for almost a year and i found it no problem using this string..... overall, i fink this is a good string....

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 34
    : 03-12-2013, 04:11 PM
  2. Rougher strings vs softer strings
    By yan.v in forum Badminton Stringing Techniques & Tools
    Replies: 9
    : 03-20-2012, 11:09 AM
  3. Strings just snapped, looking for advice for new strings.
    By Quelray in forum Badminton String
    Replies: 20
    : 04-18-2011, 10:16 PM
  4. Where to get your strings done?
    By chinaman69 in forum Canada West
    Replies: 7
    : 10-27-2007, 06:18 PM
  5. repulsion strings offensive strings?
    By yy_ling in forum Badminton String
    Replies: 16
    : 12-30-2006, 05:07 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •