AT300 => AT900t?

Discussion in 'Racket Recommendation / Comparison' started by Ryoga, Oct 30, 2007.

  1. Ryoga

    Ryoga Regular Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2006
    Messages:
    16
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Sauga
    Hi,

    I am currently using a 4U AT300 and am now thinking of buying an 4U AT900 technique. I like the AT300 for its lightness and control but I would like more power. I play doubles and more net but go for smashes a fair bit too. I prefer more balanced rackets (not TOO head heavy). Would the AT900 be a good upgrade based on what I'm looking for? Thanks in advance
     
    #1 Ryoga, Oct 30, 2007
    Last edited: Oct 30, 2007
  2. drifit

    drifit newbie

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2007
    Messages:
    2,609
    Likes Received:
    6
    Occupation:
    PM
    Location:
    Selangor, Malaysia
    bull's-eye....:D
    based on the criteria that you want, At900T is the one you need....:)
     
    #2 drifit, Oct 30, 2007
  3. roller

    roller Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2006
    Messages:
    330
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Singapore
    I found the AT300 less demanding than the AT900T and my smashes were more powerful when I used the AT300.
     
    #3 roller, Nov 1, 2007
  4. Ar Dan

    Ar Dan Regular Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2007
    Messages:
    504
    Likes Received:
    1
    Occupation:
    Property Management
    Location:
    Hong Kong
    That's probably due to the different shaft stiffness
     
    #4 Ar Dan, Nov 1, 2007
  5. Smichz

    Smichz Regular Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2006
    Messages:
    3,385
    Likes Received:
    1
    Occupation:
    Student,Tour guide,Marketer
    Location:
    Beijing,Guilin,K.L & Jakarta
    The higher end rackets r more demanding than those lower ends.At start,maybe u think that they're not better than ur old ones.But once u got used to it,it'll blow all ur current thoughts.They(yonex)wont put a bad racket into the higher end rackets market rite?All u gotta do is get used to it..
     
    #5 Smichz, Nov 1, 2007
  6. afham07

    afham07 Regular Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2005
    Messages:
    198
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    Malaysia
    yes .. I agree .. It happened to me when I switched from MP66 to NS8k .. after 2-3 weeks with NS8k, I really was regretting with ns8k and was thinking to sell it off. I am lucky because no1 want to buy and I used ns8k everytime i play. After I get used to it, I really really love it!. :).
     
    #6 afham07, Nov 1, 2007
  7. locker138

    locker138 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2007
    Messages:
    6
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Hong Kong
    I had AT300 4U before, and just got NS9000S 3U5. It is very easy to use, I also tried At900T and At900P. For smash, AT900P no question. But for a all round play, NS9000S is better than the rest.
     
    #7 locker138, Nov 15, 2007
  8. cooler

    cooler Regular Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2002
    Messages:
    21,811
    Likes Received:
    23
    Occupation:
    Surfing, reading fan mails:D, Dilithium Crystal hu
    Location:
    Basement Boiler Room
    if u want more power, go with a 3u 300 instead. It's cheaper than a 4u at900 too.
     
    #8 cooler, Nov 15, 2007

Share This Page