User Tag List

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 17 of 18
  1. #1
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    LYON FRANCE
    Posts
    52
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Shifting from head light to head heavy

    HI Guys,

    I'm an intermediate player, currently using 2 head light raquets one of xhich is the N6000 (24lb, BG66).

    My game getting a little bit better, more attacking but still lacking smash power, I would like to shift to a more attacking raquet but not extra stiff.

    Do you have any recommendation ?

    Many thx

  2. #2
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    germany
    Posts
    70
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    i hope more people will answer to this thread. i am using NS 6000 as well mainly for doubles as it is a fast racket and the power is not bad too but i am suffering a bit with this racket in singles. not enough power to really pressure the opponent.

  3. #3
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    germany
    Posts
    70
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    hi,
    i think i can understand your situation. NS 6000 is a flexible racket but it does feel medium to me.
    anyway.. maybe you should not go for such a drastic change from headlight to head heavy.

    i think it would be good if you find a racket that is even balance. there are quite a few from yonex such as MP45 or Arcsaber 7 or MP 29 light, MP21. the last 2 are not high end rackets but who's to say they cannot produce enough power?

    i personally am choosing between MP 45 or Arcsaber 7 as my next racket. both rackets are medium stiff. hope this helps.

    Quote Originally Posted by BadGone View Post
    HI Guys,

    I'm an intermediate player, currently using 2 head light raquets one of xhich is the N6000 (24lb, BG66).

    My game getting a little bit better, more attacking but still lacking smash power, I would like to shift to a more attacking raquet but not extra stiff.

    Do you have any recommendation ?

    Many thx

  4. #4
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Somewhere over the rainbow.
    Posts
    197
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Try the at500, it's about even balance, and can produce a good amount of power. Not a though racquet to handle. See if you can demo it.

  5. #5
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Irvine CA, 92617 USA
    Posts
    6
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    If you want to try, you could put lead tape or some sort of tape on the top of your racket. It makes the head heavier, and you should still be use to the weight of your racket. The extra weight of the tape should make your smashes better while it won't affect your movements that much. if you decided to switch rackets, then it might take some time to adapt to it.

  6. #6
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Somewhere over the rainbow.
    Posts
    197
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I'm suprised no one has tried to tie a brick to the head of their racquets. That would give you the headheavies racquet in the world.
    Think of how insane your smashes would be.
    Defense would be a bit lacking, but that's not an issue, is it?

  7. #7
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    452
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Well as he isn't complaining about doubles... maybe he should try it out UncleFester.

  8. #8
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    somewhere in NA
    Posts
    314
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    using ns 5k but i've got new ti 10 comming which is little head heavier and much more stiff. i'll tell you by this sunday

  9. #9
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    germany
    Posts
    70
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    too bad i they are not selling any ti-10 here in germany. :-( would love to try that out.

  10. #10
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    452
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    BadGone, have a look at these:
    http://www.badmintoncentral.com/foru...959#post718959

    The seller lives in Germany, and I think these rackets do suit you. They are X-stiff, but they produce a lot of power.

  11. #11
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    San Jose, CA
    Posts
    105
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    u can try using teh new armotec 700, it stiff and well balance. good for both att and def

  12. #12
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    germany
    Posts
    70
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    i think you are the first to say that AT 700 is well balanced.. haha


    Quote Originally Posted by Phuong View Post
    u can try using teh new armotec 700, it stiff and well balance. good for both att and def

  13. #13
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    2,272
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Phuong View Post
    u can try using teh new armotec 700, it stiff and well balance. good for both att and def
    AT700 is a rock compared to Nanospeeds.Try the NS9000S, or AT900T.

  14. #14
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    San Francisco/Davis California
    Posts
    270
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by UncleFester View Post
    I'm suprised no one has tried to tie a brick to the head of their racquets. That would give you the headheavies racquet in the world.
    Think of how insane your smashes would be.
    Defense would be a bit lacking, but that's not an issue, is it?
    why tie a brick to your racket when it can easily swing back and emasculate you? Use a frozen turkey, it's big and round, and people will be scared of you. But watch out if it drips cuz like you'll slip.

  15. #15
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    1,237
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    theres many variables in producing power, and while some will say balance of the racquet will play a role, i think its quite minor.
    theres lots of players who use pretty head light racquets and still produce massive power with them, since ultimately the player makes the power, not the racquet, right?

    have you tried various different strings and tensions to see if it might bump up the power a bit?

    i don't want to mention it here, since we're in the equipment forums, and not general/technique, but theres also the option of playing around and trying out different stuff with your stroke technique a bit which might in the end, turn out to be a more rewarding/enlightening and much cheaper alternative.

    Quote Originally Posted by NoName1225 View Post
    why tie a brick to your racket when it can easily swing back and emasculate you? Use a frozen turkey, it's big and round, and people will be scared of you. But watch out if it drips cuz like you'll slip.
    i think a fully frozen turkey through and through will still hurt you just as much as a brick. and worse, it'll put an even bigger dent in your ego than any brick can do.
    Last edited by chickenpoodle; 11-21-2007 at 12:06 AM.

  16. #16
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Ottawa, Ontario
    Posts
    405
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mel_baddie View Post
    i think you are the first to say that AT 700 is well balanced.. haha
    Make that the second! XD I really do find it perfect in terms of balance and def/off is easy to pull off as well -____________-;;

  17. #17
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    2,272
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I too find that it's well balanced... for me. For anybody else, and on the technical side of things, having a 310mm balance point even with overgrip is just seriously head heavy compared to other racquets.

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 19
    : 07-27-2011, 12:15 AM
  2. Replies: 2
    : 07-08-2011, 08:05 PM
  3. Head light or head heavy rackets likely to cause tennis elbow?
    By TRENTEND in forum Badminton Rackets / Equipment
    Replies: 19
    : 09-23-2008, 11:49 AM
  4. How does 'head heavy' or 'head light' effect a racquet's suitability for a player?
    By bad_man_ton in forum Badminton Rackets / Equipment
    Replies: 34
    : 06-12-2007, 06:10 AM
  5. AT900 head-heavy or head-light ?
    By foo.tw in forum Badminton Rackets / Equipment
    Replies: 3
    : 04-04-2007, 11:39 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •