Results 18 to 32 of 32
12-04-2007, 12:57 PM #18
Well, TV cameras can usually make a good replay of the shot and where the shuttle lands. For example, you can see in the All England numerous replays. Of course, those replays are usually done from QF to F, but nonetheless, it's better than nothing.
I think they can make it with the current equipments they have. If a player wants to challenge, the TV and camera crew can make an instant replay and inform the judge that they caught the shuttle landing on video. If they don't, then the initial call stands.
The FINA has strict rules, and that is good. But is it for the Olympics only?
For the usual competition in Badminton, I sincerely doubt the IBF won't allow more than 2 players or team per individual event...
12-04-2007, 01:38 PM #19
The only REAL SOLUTION is to promote individualism in badminton. It doesn't matter how many more objections we make here, national pride will always override gamesmanship if the structure of badminton doesn't change.
12-04-2007, 06:29 PM #20
By their very nature line calls are prone to human error. I'd also point out that mechanised systems are not fool proof either. It may help reduce
controversy if none of the officials were from the same country as either of the players involved in the match (I'm surprised this isn't the case already). Wong8Egg is right, remove the nationalistic element from the competitions like in Tennis. I know you can't do this in the Olypics but who cares? These days, cheating itself is an Olypic event.
12-04-2007, 08:36 PM #21
In Tennis, the host country supplies the team of linespersons
12-04-2007, 09:03 PM #22
With the exception of the Davis Cup Tennis is not treated as a team sport. The players compete as individuals. The line calling issue will correct itself thanks to television. You can look at a replay and get a definative answer as to wether the bird was out or in. Eventually if a nation habitually makes questionable calls it will get noticed and action can be taken.
The walkover issue is a little more complicated as it is harder to prove an injury or illness. However when a Country begins to abuse walkovers a statistical analysis can be brought to bear and it will become obvious. It was a bad sign when people were able to predict a walkover would occur in the Semis of the HK Open as soon as it was known two Chinese players were to face each other. In the long run it's self-destructive as in the future any legitimate retirements will look suspisious.
For either issue it's best just to remove the Nationalistic element. I'm sure given the choice any player would rather play the match then give up. You don't get that far without being very competative.
12-04-2007, 09:13 PM #23
Also, CCTV is hardly the primary tennis broadcaster
As such, spiking an inconvenient TV replay wouldn't be an option
The instant replays would also be greatly embarrassing should someone try a Li Yongbo on the match
12-04-2007, 10:22 PM #24
Instant replay on the big screen at tournament venues
12-05-2007, 12:27 AM #25
i agree with the camera on courts but i prefer unlimited challenges in the finals. and the camera only come into play starting at quarterfinals. yes i do know it is expensive. but maybe a simple handycam like the ones tourists use to take videos, at multiple points and connected to the big screen will do. this is because i really dont think much can be done to change the way linesman work and really some of them must be mistaken and not intentionally calling bad shots. i think cameras can at least give a better leverage to all players.
12-05-2007, 04:38 AM #26
12-05-2007, 04:34 PM #27
Why do we have so much controversy? It is badminton fans don't care enough. I know, I'm being harsh, but it isn't too far from the truth. If you pay your hard earned money to see a match, take your family and friends to the game and someone throws away a match or doesn't even play, you are essentially swindled out of your money. If badminton fans cared enough to cause an uproar or at least act as if they cared, then the organizers and WBF will care and do something about it. It is as simple as that. Same with bad line judges. If you put up with crap, you will get more crap. That is life.
12-05-2007, 06:11 PM #28
12-06-2007, 07:13 AM #29
Bad sign: When people are able to predict a walkover
As soon as the announcement was made, many people jumped at the conclusion that Chen Jin was to be given a chance to make it to the Final.
01-28-2008, 08:27 PM #30
BWF is required to introduce the 'Hawk-Eye' ASAP
After reading so much of the allegeable "bad line calls" at the Korea Open Super Series 2008, it is only wished that BWF will introduce the 'Hawk-Eye' ASAP.
It is so sad to see how many players, coaches, officials and even spectators are overreacting over line calls.
Last edited by chris-ccc; 01-28-2008 at 08:36 PM.
01-28-2008, 08:50 PM #31
Hawk-Eye System: What is IT ???
For those who do not know what the 'Hawk-Eye' system is... here is an explanation, located at Wikipedia:
02-02-2008, 10:19 AM #32
BWF will consider introducing technologies used in tennis and cricket
BWF will consider introducing technologies used in tennis and cricket. Here is an article from Reuters.
====== ====== start article ====== ======
Probe launched into Korean Open bust-up
LONDON, Feb 2 (Reuters) - The Badminton World Federation will investigate scuffles that marred last week's men's singles final at the Korea Open and will consider introducing technologies used in tennis and cricket.
Anne Smillie, chair of the BWF sport committee, has called for a full report and said such incidents were happening too often.
Last Sunday's final of the Super Series event between China's Lin Dan and eventual winner Lee Hyun-il of South Korea featured a number of line calls overruled by the umpire, which led to scuffles and heated exchanges.
"All of this is damaging to the image of our sport and undermines confidence in the results," Smillie said in a statement.
"Players, coaches, technical officials and team officials at court side have a code of behaviour to follow.
"The game needs to be exciting and closely fought, but we all want to see the result determined by the players, not by courtside officials -- or who can argue the loudest."
Smillie said the BWF would look at other options to take the heat out of official decisions, including technologies used in tennis and cricket.
BWF deputy president Punch Gunalan said: "In this Olympic year, when badminton will be under the microscope in Beijing, the players need to be confident that the game is officiated professionally, while respecting the technical officials' decisions."
The BWF will hold meetings at the next Super Series event, the All England Open in Birmingham in March, where the issue of technology will be discussed.
The sport committee is also talking to referees and umpires to look at the possibility of having independent umpires operating as line judges during major semi-finals and finals.
World number one Lin has refused to apologise for his part in the fracas in Seoul, which began when he threw his racket in the direction of South Korea's singles coach Li Mao, who is also Chinese.
The throwing incident sparked a shouting match between Lin and Li and play was momentarily halted as match officials struggled to restore order.
Lin's coach Zhong Bo also intervened, pushing Li, who shoved him back, and officials had to step in to separate them.
====== ====== end article ====== ======
By yadi_susan in forum SingaporeReplies: 51: 05-15-2008, 06:20 AM
By flyingbird007 in forum Canada WestReplies: 12: 12-18-2007, 09:44 PM
By Announce_23 in forum Canada WestReplies: 0: 04-11-2007, 10:29 AM
By galeru in forum Badminton Tournament Video SharingReplies: 2: 01-29-2006, 03:56 PM
By Smiley in forum General ForumReplies: 3: 05-27-2005, 04:31 PM