User Tag List

Page 6 of 18 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 LastLast
Results 86 to 102 of 292
  1. #86
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Beijing,Guilin,K.L & Jakarta
    Posts
    3,988
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    ants is a damn lucky guy..envy u..

  2. #87
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    27
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    just played with the AT900-T =)
    Strung /w NGB 95 @ 25lbs
    3UG4

    again moving from an NS8000 3UG4 strung /w NGB 95 @24 lbs... there was definitely a difference lol. For sure heavier and i couldn't generate a lot of power at first, but that's for any new racket that you're trying out =)

    But give this racket some time, as when you use this racket more, you'll begin to be able to use its power. I realized this after around 1 hour of playing =).

    Smashes for me was a lot stronger and the drives and clears are really effortless =).

    Overall very happy with the switch, just need more time to adjust ^^

  3. #88
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Beijing,Guilin,K.L & Jakarta
    Posts
    3,988
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    So,is there any one of u who is using both 900 T & P?I wanna know how it feels,the difference..strung at the same tension,same string,same weight,same grip size.

  4. #89
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    TW
    Posts
    393
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I had tried an AT900-P 4ug5 now.
    IMO, it's a good racket for Singles.
    Though it fits my assumption to be not as good as 3U AT900T overall, it still performs nearly as good, except for the durability.
    What's the point to go for an overall worse racket rather than 3U AT900T?

    If you are using a 3U AT900-P in Doubles and also play Singles sometimes, a 4U AT900P gives you a very close performance to 3U AT900T alone with a much shorter conversion time. ( At the expense of worse durability. However, durability is not a major problem if you use it in singles only.)

  5. #90
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Beijing,Guilin,K.L & Jakarta
    Posts
    3,988
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    How much difference can an AT900 3U n 4U hold(tension)?1 to 2 lbs?Hoho..i'll never use my at900 in any doubles game.So i guess he'll just sit on the bench most of the time,since i mainly play doubles..lol

  6. #91
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Richmond, BC. Canada
    Posts
    363
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Matt View Post
    CanuckBur,

    How do you like the racket so far?
    I don't think I will use any other racquet. This racquet is an excellent all-around racquet. All my good games were treated by me as if they were due to the excellent performance of this racquet. Today, I did two jump shots near the baseline to the other side's inner baseline! These are two spectacular and surreal smashes (I hope I can do them again). It helps to build my confidence too. I am paying more attention to my footworks than worrying whether I could make a good shot. When I have time, I will start to take lessons again.
    Last edited by CanuckBur; 10-08-2007 at 07:34 PM.

  7. #92
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    27
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    got a question
    i just added grip tape to my at900t

    it feels less head heavy... should i undo the grip?

  8. #93
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Richmond, BC. Canada
    Posts
    363
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    No. You don't have to. Reduce the length of the overgrip and wrap it again. Try it a few times, and measure the balance point every time until the balance point is over 30.0 cm.

  9. #94
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    78
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    hey guys, I am currently using AT800 4U DE (bg 80) right now...

    Thinking to get an AT900, just wondering if to AT900T 4U (NBG 98) will suit my style..

  10. #95
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    27
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    eeep lol problem is i didn't grip it =\ lol
    my cousin gripped it for me cuz i didn't know how
    may need to ask someone who knows what you're talking about ><"
    but i'll keep that in mind though

    thanks for the help ^^

  11. #96
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    6
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Original balance point with string

    Quote Originally Posted by CanuckBur View Post
    No. You don't have to. Reduce the length of the overgrip and wrap it again. Try it a few times, and measure the balance point every time until the balance point is over 30.0 cm.
    CanuckBur,

    First of all, I tried searching for balance point in the forums and didn't find the answer to this: Where do you start measuring from? I will assume the bottom of the grip.

    Secondly, my strung racquet already has the balance point 30 cm away from the bottom of the handle. If I add an overgrip which I'd like to use, the racquet won't be head heavy (even though it doesn't feel all that head heavy with no overgrip)...

    Oh it's an AT900T 3UG4...

  12. #97
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    27
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by korendir07 View Post
    CanuckBur,

    First of all, I tried searching for balance point in the forums and didn't find the answer to this: Where do you start measuring from? I will assume the bottom of the grip.

    Secondly, my strung racquet already has the balance point 30 cm away from the bottom of the handle. If I add an overgrip which I'd like to use, the racquet won't be head heavy (even though it doesn't feel all that head heavy with no overgrip)...

    Oh it's an AT900T 3UG4...
    lol i did that already =\ so i'm lost right now

  13. #98
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    27
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CanuckBur View Post
    No. You don't have to. Reduce the length of the overgrip and wrap it again. Try it a few times, and measure the balance point every time until the balance point is over 30.0 cm.
    over 30 cm...
    ok so this is what i gather
    i measureed 30cm and its around at the 9 on the 900
    upon putting the grip tape it is now at the 0 on the 900 the second position

    so what u're saying is that i have to reduce the grip until its back on the 9 or more?

  14. #99
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Richmond, BC. Canada
    Posts
    363
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by korendir07 View Post
    CanuckBur,

    First of all, I tried searching for balance point in the forums and didn't find the answer to this: Where do you start measuring from? I will assume the bottom of the grip.

    Secondly, my strung racquet already has the balance point 30 cm away from the bottom of the handle. If I add an overgrip which I'd like to use, the racquet won't be head heavy (even though it doesn't feel all that head heavy with no overgrip)...

    Oh it's an AT900T 3UG4...
    Here is a useful thread: http://www.badmintoncentral.com/foru...e+point&page=2

    Mine is a 3UG5. I remeasured my racquet's balance point, and it is actually 297 mm. I apologize to all of you who took it as in order to get the best performance from this racquet that it has to be over 300 mm.

  15. #100
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Richmond, BC. Canada
    Posts
    363
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dairyboichau View Post
    over 30 cm...
    ok so this is what i gather
    i measureed 30cm and its around at the 9 on the 900
    upon putting the grip tape it is now at the 0 on the 900 the second position

    so what u're saying is that i have to reduce the grip until its back on the 9 or more?
    When I got my racquet, I used the whole roll. I wrapped it until the shaft but its performance really bugged me. So I reduced the tape with each trial until I found what was best for me. It doesn't have to be over 30 cm. My initial measurement was wrong (not 30.2cm). It is 29.7cm. You can try what I did by trial and error. Your solution is different than mine.

    To answer your question, my balance point is between the 9 and the 0.

  16. #101
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    27
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    so i'll have to play around with it =) thanks a bunch

  17. #102
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Beijing,Guilin,K.L & Jakarta
    Posts
    3,988
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dairyboichau View Post
    over 30 cm...
    ok so this is what i gather
    i measureed 30cm and its around at the 9 on the 900
    upon putting the grip tape it is now at the 0 on the 900 the second position

    so what u're saying is that i have to reduce the grip until its back on the 9 or more?
    When u added an additional overgrip,that should put u around 900..that's should fit most of the beginner-intermediate players.But if u r intermediate,then u can reduce the length overgrip or not using it n make it to
    the 900.It'll feel much harder to control n uncomfy,but for the price u paid,it'll make ur smashes harder(heavier head).So,it's all depends on ur need.I supposed if u use T,then u want a better comfort n control.Bcos if u're looking for a harder smash,then u're supposed to use the P,which its shaft is stiffer.
    Last edited by Smichz; 10-11-2007 at 03:54 AM.

Page 6 of 18 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Victor fans club
    By Yoppy in forum Badminton Rackets / Equipment
    Replies: 3964
    : 07-20-2014, 08:07 AM
  2. Wilson fans club :)
    By Footwork_816 in forum Badminton Rackets / Equipment
    Replies: 60
    : 11-18-2013, 01:33 AM
  3. Kx Fans Club
    By charleslml in forum Badminton Rackets / Equipment
    Replies: 26
    : 03-14-2011, 04:45 PM
  4. pro ace fans club
    By thunder killer in forum Badminton Rackets / Equipment
    Replies: 1
    : 08-02-2008, 08:10 AM
  5. AT900-T/P Fans club!
    By Smichz in forum Badminton Rackets / Equipment
    Replies: 125
    : 11-17-2007, 10:06 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •