User Tag List

Page 9 of 18 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 LastLast
Results 137 to 153 of 292
  1. #137
    Regular Member jhirata's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Wellington, New Zealand, New Z
    Posts
    2,487
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KazeCloud View Post
    Sorry to bring this thread up again. But why doesn't the shaft of the At-900 have UHMG? It seems weird how they only have it in the frame while the At-700 has it in both.
    The UMHG is in the shaft, and Elastic Ti + UMHG in the frame. At700 has HM graphite in the shaft, not UMHG.

  2. #138
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Stockton, California
    Posts
    515
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Oooh ic. They should really make it UHMG then. =/

  3. #139
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    2,272
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jhirata View Post
    The UMHG is in the shaft, and Elastic Ti + UMHG in the frame. At700 has HM graphite in the shaft, not UMHG.
    http://www.yonex.com/badminton/racquets/armortec.html
    Yonex has it listed as elasticti + HMG shaft and Microti + ElasticTi + UHMG as a frame.

  4. #140
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Stockton, California
    Posts
    515
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I can almost see in their next Armortec or newer racket, their going to put UHMG in their shaft also. Making them the newer version. Cunning little Yonex...

    I think thats why they stopped the Ti-10. It was too good for the time, having UHMG throughout the racket. So they went backwards and had regular HMG, and slowly add it in.

  5. #141
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    53
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ants View Post
    Taufik is using 3UG4 also.. i broke the one that he gave me.
    Hey ants, what was Taufik's racket version that you broke? Is it SP?

  6. #142
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Stockton, California
    Posts
    515
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Oh no. I just emailed Asby's sports and they say the At-900 Us only comes in 4UG4. No 3U. =/

    Can somebody confirm this? I don't want to buy overseas again. They might have certain imperfections I don't like.
    Last edited by KazeCloud; 01-28-2008 at 07:48 PM.

  7. #143
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    UCLA
    Posts
    151
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I can confirm it's 4U only in US.

  8. #144
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Stockton, California
    Posts
    515
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Aw man. >=[

    Thats just...*Sigh*

    Anybody know a great oversea dealer?

  9. #145
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Beijing,Guilin,K.L & Jakarta
    Posts
    3,976
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Reiko View Post
    You guys are rude! Haha! I own 4U AT900T but you guys keep on criticizing it. I'm a girl and a girl wants a light racket. :P But I guess not all. I also want 3U racket, I can buy one as soon as I want it too. But first I have to break my 4U racket. Not intentionally but accidentally. )
    Not at all i believe.I have AT900 4U by myself.Ppl prefer 3U probably because it's heavier(more power),n more durable.But i believe it's all personal preference.Nothing's wrong with picking a 4U.4U in china is rare,n lots of ppl r looking for it.At least,having one in here makes me proud.Alot of pro players that also used 4U.AT900 4U is light,fast,n powerful!

  10. #146
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    30
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I'am just using AT900T for just 2 months with string Nanogy 95 at 25.5 lbs , previously i'm using AT300 with string BG 85 at 25.5 lbs.
    The result currently - I'm losing the power smashing drastictly . Oh.. man its so bad.. i'm don't want losing my quality games after spending some money for high end racket. Hey buddies... give me some advise what string you use for AT900T and at what tension. I hope its not because the racket the racket not suit to me..... some tips please.

  11. #147
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    usa
    Posts
    176
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by W Norman View Post
    I'am just using AT900T for just 2 months with string Nanogy 95 at 25.5 lbs , previously i'm using AT300 with string BG 85 at 25.5 lbs.
    The result currently - I'm losing the power smashing drastictly . Oh.. man its so bad.. i'm don't want losing my quality games after spending some money for high end racket. Hey buddies... give me some advise what string you use for AT900T and at what tension. I hope its not because the racket the racket not suit to me..... some tips please.
    I have:
    1. Cab30ms at 25Lb w/BG80
    2. ms21 at 25Lb w/BG80
    3. AT900T at 25Lb w/NBG 98

    AT900T's NBG98 feels softer on impact than my friends's AT300 at 25Lb w/BG80. Not sure if I will shift to NBG98 or go back to BG80 when the strings break on any of my rackets.

  12. #148
    Regular Member jhirata's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Wellington, New Zealand, New Z
    Posts
    2,487
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by otterfun View Post
    I have:
    1. Cab30ms at 25Lb w/BG80
    2. ms21 at 25Lb w/BG80
    3. AT900T at 25Lb w/NBG 98

    AT900T's NBG98 feels softer on impact than my friends's AT300 at 25Lb w/BG80. Not sure if I will shift to NBG98 or go back to BG80 when the strings break on any of my rackets.
    Oh btw, remember that BG80/85 feels stiffer than the others because of the vectran in the strings. So basicly, 25lbs on BG80 would feel about the same as 27lbs on BG65, etc..

  13. #149
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Thailand
    Posts
    49
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    What is different between 3U / 4U for AT900T?

    Such as Head Heavy / Balance.

  14. #150
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    508
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sincerely View Post
    What is different between 3U / 4U for AT900T?

    Such as Head Heavy / Balance.
    overall weight of the racket

    IF I remember correctly..
    4u --> 90g
    3u --> 95g

  15. #151
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Thailand
    Posts
    49
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ah_Shum View Post
    overall weight of the racket

    IF I remember correctly..
    4u --> 90g
    3u --> 95g
    4U More Defense than Offensive?
    3U More Offensive than Defense?

  16. #152
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    508
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sincerely View Post
    4U More Defense than Offensive?
    3U More Offensive than Defense?
    no not realli..just overall weight of the racket..doesn't mean much

  17. #153
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Thailand
    Posts
    49
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ah_Shum View Post
    no not realli..just overall weight of the racket..doesn't mean much
    Ok Thx.

    I'm a based line player (Double) what you think I suit for AT900T(4U)?

Page 9 of 18 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Victor fans club
    By Yoppy in forum Badminton Rackets / Equipment
    Replies: 3845
    : 04-16-2014, 03:15 AM
  2. Wilson fans club :)
    By Footwork_816 in forum Badminton Rackets / Equipment
    Replies: 60
    : 11-18-2013, 01:33 AM
  3. Kx Fans Club
    By charleslml in forum Badminton Rackets / Equipment
    Replies: 26
    : 03-14-2011, 04:45 PM
  4. pro ace fans club
    By thunder killer in forum Badminton Rackets / Equipment
    Replies: 1
    : 08-02-2008, 08:10 AM
  5. AT900-T/P Fans club!
    By Smichz in forum Badminton Rackets / Equipment
    Replies: 125
    : 11-17-2007, 10:06 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •