Hi, If I read Yonex's diagram correctly, it seems like graphically NS9000S is head heavier and less stiff than AT900T. Did I read it wrong ? You see the AT900T is in the SE quadrant of the diagram which is in the same quad as a NS7000, a head light racket. If so, does that mean that NS9000S is more of a singles offensive racket and AT900T more of a head lighter doubles offensive racket ? Any help in reading that chart willl help. I am looking for a racket that is around the same stiffness as Cab 30ms but just a tiny tad head lighter. Thanks.
ns9ks is more head lighter than at900t. there is no such racket specialize for each single or double, but players tends to use "quick" racquet in double than single
1) AT900 is head heavier than NS9000-s by about 0.5-0.7cm. 2) NS9000-s has smaller frame size than AT900-t. 3) NS9000-s shaft is about 22.25cm vs AT900t is 21.9cm. 4) Just pick the one you like the better. Usually one will like NS9000-s or AT900t. Not many will like both after demo.
I am sorry for making such poor judgement call. Please accept my apology. Dear Peter the Great, Now I know you play both offense and defense...
It's the nature of the game that dictates both situation . The initiative can be gained or lost in an instance. Dink it! Too much IChing . . .
I like all NS9000X/S, AT900T/P, ArcS7... but... NS9000X is the only one that I have used only once or twice...
Hi all, I am planning to try my friend's new AT900T with NGB98 at 25#. I swung the NS9000S and AT900T string-less at the shop. I like the AT900T better. The NS9000S feels "weird". The AT900T's head weight provided an easier smoother follow through motion. The NS9000S made my swing felt truncated or ending abruptly. I am leaning towards the AT900T right now. Thanks for all your help.
You will like the AT900T even more you spend some time with it! NBG98 and BG85 are very good with this racket.