Results 681 to 697 of 1441
Thread: Yonex ArcSaber 10 Review
03-30-2008, 12:39 PM #681
haha yes you did according to DinkALot's review i can see that its the best for power but the rest are good and average, oh well ill just try em all and see what suits me best haha thanks! btw lets stick to topic ! Thanks alot guys!
03-30-2008, 12:49 PM #682
I cant se why anyone would want sucha aheavy racket anno 2008.. light and powerful is certainly better than heavy and powerful :-)
Rather a more headheavy 3U for power than a mid balanced 2U..
Sorry can't just see the logic why to choose a 2U arc-10!
03-30-2008, 01:02 PM #683
03-30-2008, 01:07 PM #684
Are you guys referring to the head heaviness of the ArcSaber 10? The 2U version might be more balanced but has more overall mass. Can anyone do a test with both the 2U and 3U?
03-30-2008, 01:08 PM #685
BTW, any issue with the T joint durability so far? Any breakage around the T joint area?
03-30-2008, 01:49 PM #686
sorry im new here but may i know what is the SP and JP version what are the differences?
03-30-2008, 02:01 PM #687
03-30-2008, 02:26 PM #688
03-30-2008, 06:28 PM #689
To confirm my feelings, I took my scale and measured one of my 900Ps and compared to my arc-10..
The 900P 3U4 with bg80@28lbs was slightly less than 90g.. and the arc-10 3U3 with bg80@28lbs was 94g (original grip, no overgrips etc).. So at least I am happy that I can trust my senses :-)
Anyone have an Arc-10 3U4 that could share the weight with bg80?? (no overgrip etc of course) ?? I am curios how much the grip size difference counts for if anything..
When I break the strings next time I will try to remember to weigh it unstrung as well
Personally I think YY should have made the arc-10 lighter.. If it mid balanced it should definitively not be heavier than the more head-heavy options like 900P in my opinion..
It would make more sense to have a 4U and a 3U option of arc-10 imop, than a 2U/3U option...
I never understood the point of making head-light or mid balanced racket that are overall heavy.. That kind of defeats the desing purpose of makim the quick and agile...
P.S. I am abit confused here.. I just measured my Mizuno TX700 and it was 80g !! with RX100@27lbs ... very confusing.. maybe the scale is poorly calibrated.. or the 3U5 mizuno is really that light and head-heavy?? D.S.
Last edited by twobeer; 03-30-2008 at 06:36 PM.
03-30-2008, 10:26 PM #690
performance/quality/durability wise are there any difference between the SP and the JP version?
03-30-2008, 10:47 PM #691
03-31-2008, 12:14 AM #692
i am so happy with AS-10 and yesterday i went to shop a 3u one for my friend, S$279 including NBG95 string. a bit odd to me is that i felt 3ug5 is more head heavy than 3ug4. anyone got the same feeling? btw, it is difficult to get a 2u one in SG
03-31-2008, 12:25 AM #693
03-31-2008, 12:33 AM #694
he...he..., i can almost hold a basket ball single hand but still prefer g5 grip easier to twist it right & left
03-31-2008, 03:49 AM #695
03-31-2008, 07:02 AM #696
03-31-2008, 08:17 AM #697
hi, sorry i'm new in this forum
i just bought my AS 10 3U G5 and i think it's the best racket i have since.
actually i dont understand does 3U mean the weight of the racket or only the weight of the head only?
previously i used armortec 800 of.
anybody would like to answer me? thanks
By ants in forum Badminton Rackets / EquipmentReplies: 2027: 05-23-2012, 06:19 PM
By Deathblader in forum Badminton Rackets / EquipmentReplies: 13: 11-25-2010, 05:22 PM
By silentheart in forum Badminton Rackets / EquipmentReplies: 53: 07-16-2010, 06:36 PM
By magiadam in forum Racket Recommendation / ComparisonReplies: 6: 11-03-2008, 02:48 AM
By ThinkRiver in forum Badminton Rackets / EquipmentReplies: 1: 02-23-2008, 04:41 PM