User Tag List

Page 6 of 85 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 56 ... LastLast
Results 86 to 102 of 1441
  1. #86
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Basement Boiler Room
    Posts
    22,118
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jhirata View Post
    Hmm.. on the chart I found, it shows that it's a little bit less head-heavy than the at500. that chart might be false though.
    what chart? maybe u mixup with ArcS7 lol
    Last edited by cooler; 02-08-2008 at 06:04 PM.

  2. #87
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    In your mind
    Posts
    809
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jhirata View Post
    Top = head-heavy
    Left = defensive
    Right = offensive
    Bottom = head-light
    I really doubt that the left and right are correct. I can't imagine that the AT 900 T would be so much more about attacking, while the AT 900 P is defensive.

  3. #88
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Beijing,Guilin,K.L & Jakarta
    Posts
    3,988
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    i love the demo racket..hehe..All black=cool!

  4. #89
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Unknown
    Posts
    35
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tsumaranai View Post
    I really doubt that the left and right are correct. I can't imagine that the AT 900 T would be so much more about attacking, while the AT 900 P is defensive.
    From the chart, LEFT should be CONTROL and RIGHT should be REPULSE.

  5. #90
    Regular Member jhirata's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Wellington, New Zealand, New Z
    Posts
    2,488
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DevilG View Post
    From the chart, LEFT should be CONTROL and RIGHT should be REPULSE.
    If i translate it word-to-word, the left says: 'taking-in' style, and the right says 'fast/quick hitting'.

    Quote Originally Posted by cooler
    what chart? maybe u mixup with ArcS7 lol
    Nope, this chart has both Arc10 and Arc7:


    I kind of doubt that this is real though.. at900p and at900t are in the opposite place in the chart.

  6. #91
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    indonesia
    Posts
    32
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Question

    Quote Originally Posted by jhirata View Post
    If i translate it word-to-word, the left says: 'taking-in' style, and the right says 'fast/quick hitting'.

    I kind of doubt that this is real though.. at900p and at900t are in the opposite place in the chart.
    'fast/quick hitting' fits AT900T 'good maneuveribility' thing for defensive play.
    'taking in' maybe 'hard hitter' or 'power' or 'attacking style'???
    but as i remembered, i haven't found read that ARC7 is actually fall in 'hard hitter' or 'power' or 'attacking style' category.
    please correct if i'm misleading.

    it's hard to believe that chart is misleading, cause i saw this guy posted them in another forum http://at700.sakura.ne.jp/viewthread...extra=page%3D1

    and also this same guy seems already had the new yonex 2008 catalogue
    http://at700.sakura.ne.jp/viewthread...extra=page%3D1

    unfortunately cant find any pic of ARC10
    and also dont understand what they are discussing
    hahhahahahhahaha

  7. #92
    Regular Member jhirata's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Wellington, New Zealand, New Z
    Posts
    2,488
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tango View Post
    'fast/quick hitting' fits AT900T 'good maneuveribility' thing for defensive play.
    'taking in' maybe 'hard hitter' or 'power' or 'attacking style'???
    but as i remembered, i haven't found read that ARC7 is actually fall in 'hard hitter' or 'power' or 'attacking style' category.
    please correct if i'm misleading.

    it's hard to believe that chart is misleading, cause i saw this guy posted them in another forum http://at700.sakura.ne.jp/viewthread...extra=page%3D1

    and also this same guy seems already had the new yonex 2008 catalogue
    http://at700.sakura.ne.jp/viewthread...extra=page%3D1

    unfortunately cant find any pic of ARC10
    and also dont understand what they are discussing
    hahhahahahhahaha
    That actually is the site where I found them all at. AT700.com just hyperlinks to that site.

  8. #93
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    indonesia
    Posts
    32
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Question

    Quote Originally Posted by cooler View Post
    ya, i held that demo racket too, a bit head heavy. Felt more heavier than at700
    how did u guys, fast3r n cooler got a hold of this racket???

    also find these pics but not sure whether they r originals





    racket looks like the recent demo pics posted

    what do u guys think???
    i thought fire is matching red/ orange colour
    not disapointed if its black though

    btw, there would be some new 2008 yonex shoes n bags in my previous post's link

  9. #94
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Basement Boiler Room
    Posts
    22,118
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tango View Post
    how did u guys, fast3r n cooler got a hold of this racket???

    also find these pics but not sure whether they r originals





    racket looks like the recent demo pics posted

    what do u guys think???
    i thought fire is matching red/ orange colour
    not disapointed if its black though

    btw, there would be some new 2008 yonex shoes n bags in my previous post's link
    zhang ning's old racket was AT700, that should give u a hint what the new 'black' one would compare to

    Now i wonder how many pros would change their rackets for the coming OG. I speculate the top winningest players wouldn't change it before the OG.
    Last edited by cooler; 02-09-2008 at 02:53 AM.

  10. #95
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    indonesia
    Posts
    32
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Question

    Quote Originally Posted by jhirata View Post
    That actually is the site where I found them all at. AT700.com just hyperlinks to that site.
    Quote Originally Posted by Hullabaloo View Post
    Found this at:
    http://at700.sakura.ne.jp/viewthread...extra=page%3D1

    I don't speak japanese or chinese so feel free to correct me, but from my limited understanding the axis are:
    top : head heavy
    bottom : head light
    left : firm feel
    right : quick, but bouncy
    what do you think of this jhirata???
    firm feel = taking in = hard hitter

  11. #96
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Basement Boiler Room
    Posts
    22,118
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jhirata View Post
    If i translate it word-to-word, the left says: 'taking-in' style, and the right says 'fast/quick hitting'.


    Nope, this chart has both Arc10 and Arc7:


    I kind of doubt that this is real though.. at900p and at900t are in the opposite place in the chart.
    i dont think it's official from yonex.
    Looks like it's home made

  12. #97
    Regular Member jhirata's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Wellington, New Zealand, New Z
    Posts
    2,488
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tango View Post
    what do you think of this jhirata???
    firm feel = taking in = hard hitter
    Hmm.. confusing.. maybe it's left: slow'er swing ( control /defensive ? ) and right: quick/fast swing ( offensive ).

    ArcSaber 7 is known to be very good in terms of control, so it's on the left, whilst NS9KS is a hard-hitter's racquet.

    I think I understand this now, but quite hard to explain

  13. #98
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Canada, BC, Burnaby
    Posts
    763
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    well either way of looking at that chart even if it's homemade, thank god someone put the nanospeed 9000X far far away from at900P!!! the two are completely different racquets and all the charts from yonex puts them neck in neck close!

  14. #99
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Basement Boiler Room
    Posts
    22,118
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Optiblue View Post
    well either way of looking at that chart even if it's homemade, thank god someone put the nanospeed 9000X far far away from at900P!!! the two are completely different racquets and all the charts from yonex puts them neck in neck close!
    u have to learn how to read charts and not how close or far away the bubbles are lol.
    ex. like, reading the axis

  15. #100
    Regular Member jhirata's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Wellington, New Zealand, New Z
    Posts
    2,488
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Anyway from what I can see, the new ArcSaber 10 is supposed to be more of an attack-based racquet than the ArcSaber7.

  16. #101
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Hobart, Tasmania
    Posts
    220
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I havent seen a cost for the ArcSaber10 only the Saber7.

    Anyway Ive ordered a ArcSaber7 and Nanogy 95. Review to follow within a week.

  17. #102
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    153
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by robc06 View Post
    I havent seen a cost for the ArcSaber10 only the Saber7.

    Anyway Ive ordered a ArcSaber7 and Nanogy 95. Review to follow within a week.
    98 is the way to go with AS7.... imo..

Page 6 of 85 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 56 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Yonex ArcSaber Z Slash Review
    By ants in forum Badminton Rackets / Equipment
    Replies: 2027
    : 05-23-2012, 07:19 PM
  2. Yonex ArcSaber 8 DX Review :D
    By Deathblader in forum Badminton Rackets / Equipment
    Replies: 13
    : 11-25-2010, 06:22 PM
  3. Yonex ArcSaber 9 Review
    By silentheart in forum Badminton Rackets / Equipment
    Replies: 53
    : 07-16-2010, 07:36 PM
  4. My Review: Yonex ArcSaber 9 vs. Ti-10 (3rd Gen.)
    By magiadam in forum Racket Recommendation / Comparison
    Replies: 6
    : 11-03-2008, 03:48 AM
  5. Yonex ArcSaber 10's personal review from other person
    By ThinkRiver in forum Badminton Rackets / Equipment
    Replies: 1
    : 02-23-2008, 05:41 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •