Swiss Open 2008: LCW lost to himself !

**sjoe** · 03-17-2008, 12:54 AM

Originally Posted by xymaerts

NOT AGREE with Misbun comment?? hmn... Or why not u just share with us your though.. Don't give me a this kind of answer like LD is too good/strong for LCW..

I never said that LD is too good/strong for LCW.. no one is too good/strong to anyone. But no on the same par with LCW.
LCW must improve in some area where LD above him as I say in earlier comment.

**xymaerts** · 03-17-2008, 12:59 AM

There is also some area that LD need to improve as those area is LCW above him.. So plus, minus.. the are on par..Again and again, it is the on court performance decide the winner..

Originally Posted by sjoe

I never said that LD is too good/strong for LCW.. no one is too good/strong to anyone. But no on the same par with LCW.
LCW must improve in some area where LD above him as I say in earlier comment.

**Winston_T** · 03-17-2008, 01:16 AM

Originally Posted by dannyang

I agree with above bold statement. to me, LD won 2 SS so far this year (due to AE08).

actually 3, with Korea SS.

**X Ball** · 03-17-2008, 01:18 AM

It seems to me every time LCW wins, all the LCW's fans are vocal. But when LD wins, all his fans will claim this and that.

At the end of the day, it is just that - a lot of posturing on both sides. So don't be so assertive - it amounts to nothing all said and done.

Anyway, I think LCW will thrash LD the next time round.

**xymaerts** · 03-17-2008, 01:22 AM

Like that also can...hahahaha...

Originally Posted by Winston_T

actually 3, with Korea SS.

**Winston_T** · 03-17-2008, 01:25 AM

Originally Posted by cooler

One more, line judges can beat LD too

Originally Posted by taufik-ist

only happening outside of china

LD also complaint about the line judge in CO 07, when PSH beat him.

**HiddenPower** · 03-17-2008, 01:29 AM

LCW lost, fair and square.
LD played a better game this time. Other then LD’s teammates, LCW is the closest one who can match LD’s performance at this moment.

LD is still the king, and I hope he get the gold in OG08.

**Winston_T** · 03-17-2008, 01:34 AM

Originally Posted by ye333

I think the thing we need to find out is whether this pressure comes from LD's shots or from LD's fame (or head to head with LCW). If it is the former, then LCW is pretty much doomed since LD is like one class above him; If it is the latter, then LCW can work on his mental strength and do better next time. The description from those ppl watching the match indicates that the latter is true, but of course we need to find the video and judge with our own eyes.

In fact, if LCW play cooler, and cooler is in super-form that day and returned some of LCW's great shots, I suspect LCW will indeed lose his cool and commit some mistakes.

someone in here already posted that, Misbun (or Roslin, not so sure), gives an extra 10 points to 2 amateur players, before the game started, using OSS. in the end, Misbun won 15-10 in a Single vs Double match.

**Winston_T** · 03-17-2008, 01:51 AM

Originally Posted by pjswift

Remember this: LD is not going to have 2 CHN MS lined up for him in OG08, like here. Maybe not even 1 CHN MS. He's gonna be on his own.
Of course LCW is on par with LD. LD has a lot of respect for LCW . Look how LD invites LCW to share the same champion podium with him.I don't think LD offers that to any other player.

if BCL was drawn in the same path with CJ, so LD will not meet his teammates until the final.
if they meet in final, it means All - Chinese final.
even if LYB ask CJ / BCL to gave up, I dare to say, they won't to follow the order, bcoz CHN had already win the gold. no reason for match - fixing.

**Winston_T** · 03-17-2008, 01:58 AM

whatever u want to say, but I'm feel very happy right now.
eventhough LD has better head to head against LCW,
but this is the first time LD beat LCW in straight sets.

**taufik-ist** · 03-17-2008, 02:02 AM

Originally Posted by Winston_T

whatever u want to say, but I'm feel very happy right now.
eventhough LD has better head to head against LCW,
but this is the first time LD beat LCW in straight sets.

happy cooking.... winston...

**Winston_T** · 03-17-2008, 02:03 AM

Originally Posted by xymaerts

That is no need to bring back Li Mao..Both the coaches had make LCW a better player.. LCW is good on his attacking(cross court smash with deep deception)+ good defense..

he has a good defense. solid defence.

**HKChua** · 03-17-2008, 02:05 AM

If LCW can defend himself against LD better than how we had defended him in the forum, he would have won....

Thanks.

**Winston_T** · 03-17-2008, 02:08 AM

Originally Posted by HKChua

If LCW can defend himself against LD better than how we had defended him in the forum, he would have won....

Thanks.

LD's smash was too strong & accurate for LCW.
that's why LCW's solid defense can be "broken" by LD

**HKChua** · 03-17-2008, 02:16 AM

Originally Posted by Winston_T

LD's smash was too strong & accurate for LCW.
that's why LCW's solid defense can be "broken" by LD

What if someone generates very very powerful smashes, and always aiming at his opponents's head, eyes, mouth, nose, cheek... and so on, is it legal (basing on badminton rules)?

This is a serious question. If anyone were to think that it is out of topic, well... I will rephrarse the question so that it is within the subject raised...

What if LD generates very very powerful smashes, and always aiming at LCW's head, eyes, mouth, nose, cheek... and so on, is it legal (basing on badminton rules)?

Thanks again.

***kwun*** · 03-17-2008, 02:45 AM

Originally Posted by HKChua

What if someone generates very very powerful smashes, and always aiming at his opponents's head, eyes, mouth, nose, cheek... and so on, is it legal (basing on badminton rules)?

This is a serious question. If anyone were to think that it is out of topic, well... I will rephrarse the question so that it is within the subject raised...

What if LD generates very very powerful smashes, and always aiming at LCW's head, eyes, mouth, nose, cheek... and so on, is it legal (basing on badminton rules)?

Thanks again.

sounds irrelevant. unless you can explain why it is relevant to the topic, your post and subsequent responses will be deleted.