Results 188 to 204 of 362
Thread: Why +2lbs On The Cross?
01-07-2008, 03:45 PM #188
01-07-2008, 08:14 PM #189
01-07-2008, 08:44 PM #190
True, not having a starting not at the top will be the disadvantage of this method (btm to up) as u mentioned. But, here lies the true test of stringing skills to try to achieve the best possible finishing tie off at the top end of the frame.
It's something for everyone (present company included) to strive for better results and consintency. With out such challenges, stringing rackets would have been a dull routine devoid of enthusiasm after understanding the basic procedures.
Last edited by jug8man; 01-07-2008 at 08:48 PM.
01-07-2008, 08:54 PM #191
The blatant dangers of stringing crosses top to bottom showcased once again. It's not a matter of poor stringing skills but a flawed method.
Stringing crosses top to bottom is akin to dead breaking your car with your gearbox. the damage!
It does work but you wouldn't need it if u had good brakes to begin with!
Last edited by jug8man; 01-07-2008 at 08:58 PM.
01-07-2008, 10:03 PM #192
01-08-2008, 12:11 AM #193
0) Gearbox anology looks perfectly fine to me.
1) Was comparing stringing crosses top to bottom againts crosses bottom to top.
2) I did not even mention stringing one piece vs 2 piece. Why did you bring it up?
3) there is more than 1 variation of 1 piece stringing. Your statement is too general.
4) I'm not promoting 1 piece stringing here. I'm Dis-promoting stringing crosses top to bottom (in general) (some rackets are not designed to have much problem with this method. I stated it somewhere long time ago a few times). Try and Stick with the topic discussed.
4) I do remember telling the kids to 'don't try this at home' especially when I've already said before my methods are not for everybody.
01-08-2008, 01:56 AM #194
Each is free to choose top/down or down/top for the crosses. But I am on firm ground when I say that top/down crosses with a real starting knot is the undisputed king in playability. Down/top is another Yonex marketing (actually an insurance against more claims from high tension, not unlike its understated recommended stringing tensions) ploy because AOTBE, a tie-off knot, a requirement for such down/top pattern, at the top cross string loses more than 10% tension at a critical place (top half of the frame). Using a starting knot at the throat end for that down/top is wasted effort as it serves no useful purpose.
01-08-2008, 02:25 AM #195
It's already clear that even Yonex must have noticed a significant enough corelation between racket breakage and top to bottom stringing. If not, they would never have changed such a policy
Perhaps some ppl have uber-mastered the stringing of crosses top to bottom, which is good for them. but how much of that mastery is transferable to his peers?? Very little I believe and how do you educate the entire world?
Just because someone mastered the art driving drunk safely at 40% blood alcohol level means that others should follow.
Starting knott at the throat is not wasted effort. It is instead a great foundation to good overall stringbed. The stringer must strive to compliment this developing good / decent tie off technique which should result in good lasting tension.
01-08-2008, 03:00 AM #196
I DONT KNOW, AND I DONT CARE about 1 or 2 piece, top down or throat to top cross.
i just have my own experience that 1 piece and throat to top cross satisfy me better than top down cross.
everybody has it's own experience and not always the same
01-08-2008, 03:18 AM #197
I agree with jug8man. Taneepak, I m sure you have mastered the top>down style and want to share with the rest of us. But the way you criticised the other style is not acceptable. The way I inteprete your message is your style is the only way to go. Other than your style is a waste of time or useless. I maybe be wrong. Yonex has been in this business for years, I am very sure they have done lots of research regarding the stringing method down>top. Peace!!!
01-08-2008, 03:23 AM #198
See, even the String agrees with me
01-08-2008, 03:27 AM #199
now really, if you are going to start at the bottom, what's the real difference between a 1p and a 2p?
-no starting know for the crosses: so what, the bottom cross won't be floppy (If you use base-clamps, or other methods to tension the first cross)
-there's a slight loss in symmetry because the second last main on one side will be taught, and the other has some slack because of a tie-off... Just tension it 3lbs higher, big deal...
all the advantages you think you get from the special methods are for 95% all in your head if you ask me...
01-08-2008, 07:10 AM #200
Perhaps someone can start a poll for users (not stringers) to poll their opinions on top/down vs down/top patterns of cross stringing they have used. It will be more neutral than opinions from stringers. Fair enough? After all the customer is always king.
01-08-2008, 08:08 AM #201
01-08-2008, 08:17 AM #202
10% - yes top down
10% - bottom down
80% - what's the difference?
For all the people I string here, the have more than enough problems handling which tension/string they want (heck, some can't even choose a color!)
Next up is asking them what pattern they want? where they want their knots? What kind of knots? how many crosses and mains?
If you ask me, in the end people just want their racket strung, and preferably in a way they feel plays nice...Any technical stuff just bothers or bores them...
01-08-2008, 08:19 AM #203
01-08-2008, 09:53 AM #204
Let us have an open mind. Why be so negative about it? Are we all not curious to gauge what the market says?
By KinkySmasher in forum Badminton StringReplies: 2: 07-07-2012, 05:56 AM
By lalalala in forum Badminton StringReplies: 2: 10-15-2010, 05:50 PM
By dreamzboy in forum Badminton Stringing Techniques & ToolsReplies: 34: 12-05-2009, 03:56 PM
By azn_123 in forum Badminton StringReplies: 1: 11-12-2006, 09:47 AM
By batrachian in forum Badminton Stringing Techniques & ToolsReplies: 6: 10-28-2006, 05:34 AM