User Tag List

Page 20 of 22 FirstFirst ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 LastLast
Results 324 to 340 of 367
  1. #324
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    132
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Thank you for your answers. Two more questions:

    1- The crank machines have to be calibrated frequently?

    2- How often they break?

  2. #325
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    132
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    ... The string grip in the crank machines could be adjusted? I am asking, because I am think in buying a pros pro crank machine, but I don't know the efficiency of the grip.

  3. #326
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    California
    Posts
    534
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    calibration frequency is pending upon the care you give to the machine and usage. there isn't a certain rule, but I normally do a check (verification of the reading) once a month or sooner (like every 2 weeks).

    the machine normally lasts LONG time (10+ years), with proper care and storage location.

    for the string grip. assume you are talking about the two parallel plates that hold the string. If so, yes, they can be adjusted for different string diameter. often time, you don't have to do anything about them, unless they are slipping or out of alignment. again, this is something that normally doesn't go bad at all.

  4. #327
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Bucks, England
    Posts
    15
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Hi everyone, I have read most of this thread but not all, so forgive me if this question has come up already...

    I am not a stringer, so I wondered, when a player gives you a racket and asks for it strung at say 24lbs, do you string at 24x26, or 22x24? Or 23x25?

    Thanks!

  5. #328
    Regular Member Blitzzards's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    GMT-04:00
    Posts
    1,437
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by chip167 View Post
    Hi everyone, I have read most of this thread but not all, so forgive me if this question has come up already...

    I am not a stringer, so I wondered, when a player gives you a racket and asks for it strung at say 24lbs, do you string at 24x26, or 22x24? Or 23x25?

    Thanks!
    Here is your answer. Please use a little bit of mathematical logic to calculate your specific number:

    Quote Originally Posted by DinkAlot View Post
    While this is true on your machine, you guys keep missing a point this Panda is trying to make; that's your method on your machine, not necessarily for all machines. Mounting the racket perfectly doesn't necessarily mean the racket will come out right just using one universal method for all machines.

    Example, Panda's stringing machine set-up: Combo 910 + WISE Tennishead 2086

    For a 30lbs. string job...

    ...originally with stock side supports and side arms: would need to go 28.5/31.5 to get the right shape (3lbs. difference)

    ...upgraded to the SPTennis badminton side supports: now need to go 29.5/30.5 to get the right shape (1lbs. difference)

    ...finally upgraded to the Chudek side supports + strengthened the side arms: now go 30/30 to get the right shape (0lbs. difference)

    Quite a few people have strung on Panda's machine and some had done the +2lbs. because they are used to it on their machine or other machines. When the racket is done, it's too long...

    ...again, conclusion: every machine is different and may need a different method of stringing to get the correct racket shape. If you have your method working well on your machine, GREAT! But it doesn't mean it's going to work on all machines.

    Whenever Panda strings a on new machine, Panda will ask whoever is an expert on that machine what they do and then Panda follows their recommendation first. Once the racket is strung, then Panda will know for sure.

  6. #329
    Regular Member clawhammers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Jakarta
    Posts
    680
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I wonder why YY has not suggested this +2 Lbs on the cross anymore in its annual catalogue

    Instead YY suggests to use same string tension for main and cross strings.

    cmiiw

  7. #330
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    7
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    This 1lb higher tension on the crosses issue has been bothering me, so I also did some calculations (I'm an engineer).
    I agree with the first part of your calcs (the mains are forced by the crosses to stretch about 0,6 mm over their length), HOWEVER, I think your next steps are incorrect.
    A 0.25% extra strain (strain = change in length/original length) doesn't give 0.25% extra tension.
    Actually Tension is proportional to Strain x Young's Modulus (YM is effectively the "spring constant" of the string material. I went though the theoretical calculations but the problem is finding reliable values for Young's Modulus for the string materials (they range from 6 Gpa to 28 GPa...too broad a range to be useful!). So...I did some experiments:
    What I found was that adding 5lb (20lb to 25lb) of tension on a 480mm length of BG-65 stretches it 4,5mm. Since we can assume the BG-65 is elastic in this tension range, we would see 2,25mm stretch over a 240mm length (the length of a long main) with +5lb...so, calculating 5 x 0,6/2,25 = 1.3lb would stretch a main by 0,6mm (the length we agree the mains get stretched).
    The conclusion from this analysis is that the crosses should be strung 1.3lbs higher tension than the mains to end up with the same tension on the long mains as the crosses.
    By the way, reversing out the YM gives a value around 13 GPa.

  8. #331
    Administrator kwun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Santa Clara, California, United States
    Posts
    35,919
    Mentioned
    54 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    did you take into account string density in your calculation?

    the main strings are closer together and the crosses are further apart. the effective tension for the mains are thus higher.

  9. #332
    Regular Member Mark A's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    St Helens, UK
    Posts
    4,194
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by clawhammers View Post
    I wonder why YY has not suggested this +2 Lbs on the cross anymore in its annual catalogue

    Instead YY suggests to use same string tension for main and cross strings.

    cmiiw
    Interestingly, Victor (and others) has the V limit two pounds lower than the H limit.

  10. #333
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    7
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kwun View Post
    did you take into account string density in your calculation?the main strings are closer together and the crosses are further apart. the effective tension for the mains are thus higher.
    The mains are tensioned when there's no crosses in the way (using the Yonex pattern). When the crosses are tensioned they are zig-zagging through the mains.This isn't so with the Victor pattern, where several of the bottom crosses are done first.

  11. #334
    Regular Member j4ckie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    2,757
    Mentioned
    39 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    While not super-productive concerning the ongoing discussion, I tried different tensions on my BS09s, trying to find a satisfying tension for the BG66UM where it doesn't feel dead after 3 sessions but I can still smash harder than a small girl
    Anyhow, during that, I varied the main/cross string tensions as well, as I was wasting string anyway....and had interesting results. The stringjob yielding the best head shape was a 12x12,4kg one [26.4/27.28lbs]. The 29x30 one was better in playability, but too hard for my taste, and the most recent one resulted in the best feeling of all - a 27x29lbs one. Even though the head shape is very slightly off, it just feels more alive than any other previous tension.
    I would try and guess that it's due to the cross strings being slightly tighter than the mains, giving a bit more feedback than a more homogeneous stringjob while retaining most of the repulsion of the softer mains. Personally, I'm very surprised by this, as I was pretty sure a string job with the perfect head shape would yield the best results, and I still have no real 'scientific' explanation for it.
    Still, fact is, the 27x29 feels more alive (harder too) than a 27x27, more repulsive and slightly more direct than a 28x28, and more powerful than a 29x29 (while not as hard and direct).

    Stringing was done on a Signum Pro machine modded with a WISE tension head. Same pattern and equipment for every one of those stringjobs, of course.

  12. #335
    Regular Member Mark A's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    St Helens, UK
    Posts
    4,194
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    If you're a top-downer like me, keeping the "corners" of the iso-frame is the tricky bit. I've found that 27.5/30 with 26->30 from the top cross does OK in this regard. IMO the crosses stretch the mains, so the mains need extra - end of story.

    A TD will probably never keep the frame shape, but my width/length ratio is good and I'd rather have stress end up at the bottom of the frame than the top.

  13. #336
    Regular Member j4ckie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    2,757
    Mentioned
    39 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Yep, top-down with lowered tension at the beginning. For others I wouldn't add quite as much tension as on mine, as it DOES deform the frame, but enough to even out the difference created by lengthening the mains and pulling at worse angles than on the mains (0.4-0.6kg usually).

  14. #337
    Regular Member Mark A's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    St Helens, UK
    Posts
    4,194
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I don't use the WISE prestretch, but I'm considering using it to see if more of the cross friction is pulled out - I'm wondering how much of the target tension is lost to that friction (even with ECP and the "massage" technique).

  15. #338
    Regular Member j4ckie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    2,757
    Mentioned
    39 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Hard to put a number on it, but I find that with 10% pre-stretch I need to add very little on the crosses to get a pretty homogeneous stringjob. Without the pre-stretch, I would need to 'massage' the strings (taking much time, which I don't really want to spend^^) and probably still end up short in comparison...

  16. #339
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    7
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    If the mains are done first and tied off, the crosses will stretch the mains and cause the mains tension to increase. This is basic mechanics of materials: Stress (which is Tension/String Cross Section Area) = Young's Modulus x Strain. So for a homogenous string bed, the mains should be tensioned LESS than the crosses.

  17. #340
    Regular Member j4ckie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    2,757
    Mentioned
    39 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Yep, that's what everyone does....and I'm studying to be an engineer as well, so no need to explain the basics of mechanics to me I'm just surprised a rather big difference in tension lead to such a great result, as I would've expected it to feel slightly 'off' with the crosses being tighter (even taking into account that the mains have tightened by pulling the crosses).

Page 20 of 22 FirstFirst ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Non-isometric head. 2lbs difference main/cross necessary?
    By KinkySmasher in forum Badminton String
    Replies: 2
    : 07-07-2012, 05:56 AM
  2. 2lbs on cross
    By lalalala in forum Badminton String
    Replies: 2
    : 10-15-2010, 05:50 PM
  3. 2LBs Cross Failed
    By dreamzboy in forum Badminton Stringing Techniques & Tools
    Replies: 34
    : 12-05-2009, 03:56 PM
  4. crosses and mains?? 2lbs more
    By azn_123 in forum Badminton String
    Replies: 1
    : 11-12-2006, 09:47 AM
  5. 2lbs higher on cross with 4 knob string job
    By batrachian in forum Badminton Stringing Techniques & Tools
    Replies: 6
    : 10-28-2006, 05:34 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •