# Thread: A Mistake 99% Badminton Stores Are Making

1. Regular Member
Join Date
Nov 2005
Location
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Posts
80
Post Thanks / Like
Mentioned
0 Post(s)
Tagged
0 Thread(s)

## A Mistake 99% Badminton Stores Are Making

Whenever they describe the weight of the racket, it is described with a unit of 'Grams' or 'Lbs', when it should be expressed with a unit of 'Newtons' since they're talking about the weight technically. They should express the racket's mass properly.

Just a thought XD

2. Regular Member
Join Date
Apr 2006
Location
In your mind
Posts
809
Post Thanks / Like
Mentioned
0 Post(s)
Tagged
0 Thread(s)
Um.., mass is not the same as weight. Weight is relative to gravity, and will be what you feel. Mass is the measurement of the amount of matter. Also, mass is expressed in grams...

3. Regular Member
Join Date
Nov 2005
Location
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Posts
80
Post Thanks / Like
Mentioned
0 Post(s)
Tagged
0 Thread(s)
But my point is, if they express in Weight, they must use a unit of force, such as Newtons.

4. Regular Member
Join Date
Apr 2006
Location
In your mind
Posts
809
Post Thanks / Like
Mentioned
0 Post(s)
Tagged
0 Thread(s)
But they're not... They're measuring the mass.

5. Regular Member
Join Date
Nov 2005
Location
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Posts
80
Post Thanks / Like
Mentioned
0 Post(s)
Tagged
0 Thread(s)
Originally Posted by Tsumaranai
But they're not... They're measuring the mass.
Then it should be:

"Mass: XXX Kg"

instead of

"Weight: XXX Kg"

6. Regular Member
Join Date
Sep 2005
Location
Holland
Posts
3,957
Post Thanks / Like
Mentioned
0 Post(s)
Tagged
0 Thread(s)
weight is a force, and indeed has the unit of newtons.
Mass however is an (extensive?) property, and has a unit of grams or pounds.

Also, just for poops and giggles... weight is not only dependend of the gravity, it is depended on all the forces acting on the object.
a 5kg table is acting on the floor with a weight of roughly 50N, whent he table is left standing. but when I lean on it with a 100N force the table is acting on the floor with a weight of 150N.

But it's such a common misconception everybody knows what is meant...
Our site happily states weight

(I guess this removes any doubt people had I was a geek, now they know for sure )

7. Regular Member
Join Date
Mar 2008
Location
Canada
Posts
2,623
Post Thanks / Like
Mentioned
11 Post(s)
Tagged
0 Thread(s)
Originally Posted by magiadam
But my point is, if they express in Weight, they must use a unit of force, such as Newtons.
Force is mass times acceleration. (kg*m/s2)

If you consider that the earth is pulling the racquet's mass at all times downward, I guess you could certainly describe it in Newtons....and that would be handy... when?

You: "Hey doc, my buddy dropped his 0.090kg racket on my head at 9.8m/s2 meaning I sustained a 0.882 Newton force to my forehead."
ER doc [busy stitching] "Mm, thanks for that Sport. Now just sit still, that's a good lad."

8. Regular Member
Join Date
Apr 2006
Location
In your mind
Posts
809
Post Thanks / Like
Mentioned
0 Post(s)
Tagged
0 Thread(s)
Now there's the argument you were going for.

Well, we're talking about "empty" weight, without other forces acting on the object besides gravity. Of course, that's not technically weight. Weight is one property, while another force is not considered the weight, as it is the addition of the weight of another object while there is also work being done on the object if you were to lean on it.
Last edited by Tsumaranai; 04-12-2008 at 04:03 PM.

9. Regular Member
Join Date
Mar 2008
Location
Canada
Posts
2,623
Post Thanks / Like
Mentioned
11 Post(s)
Tagged
0 Thread(s)
Originally Posted by Tsumaranai
Now there's the argument you were going for.

Well, we're talking about "empty" weight, without other forces acting on the object besides gravity. Of course, that's not technically weight. Weight is one property, while another force is not considered the weight, as it is the addition of the weight of another object while there is also work being done on the object if you were to lean on it.
That's as clear as mud
Simply put, the weight is the force the Earth has on an object's mass.

10. Regular Member
Join Date
Apr 2002
Location
Basement Boiler Room
Posts
22,118
Post Thanks / Like
Mentioned
0 Post(s)
Tagged
0 Thread(s)
Originally Posted by magiadam
Whenever they describe the weight of the racket, it is described with a unit of 'Grams' or 'Lbs', when it should be expressed with a unit of 'Newtons' since they're talking about the weight technically. They should express the racket's mass properly.

Just a thought XD
u must be a newton fan

11. Regular Member
Join Date
Mar 2008
Location
Canada
Posts
2,623
Post Thanks / Like
Mentioned
11 Post(s)
Tagged
0 Thread(s)
Originally Posted by cooler
u must be a newton fan
Me too. I loved her in 'Grease'!

12. Regular Member
Join Date
Apr 2002
Location
Basement Boiler Room
Posts
22,118
Post Thanks / Like
Mentioned
0 Post(s)
Tagged
0 Thread(s)
Originally Posted by Fidget
Me too. I loved her in 'Grease'!
oh? i thot she's a neutron bomb

13. Regular Member
Join Date
Sep 2005
Location
Holland
Posts
3,957
Post Thanks / Like
Mentioned
0 Post(s)
Tagged
0 Thread(s)
Originally Posted by fidget
Simply put, the weight is the force the Earth has on an object's mass.
weight is the force than one body acts on another (a rock lying on a table outs weight on the table)
the force the earth has on an object is called gravity

14. Regular Member
Join Date
Apr 2002
Location
Canada
Posts
6,302
Post Thanks / Like
Mentioned
0 Post(s)
Tagged
1 Thread(s)
Long lived Newtonian mechanics !!!

15. Regular Member
Join Date
Mar 2008
Location
Canada
Posts
2,623
Post Thanks / Like
Mentioned
11 Post(s)
Tagged
0 Thread(s)
Thanks Jerby. I stand corrected.
Who would have thunk that BC could be so educational?

16. Regular Member
Join Date
Apr 2006
Location
In your mind
Posts
809
Post Thanks / Like
Mentioned
0 Post(s)
Tagged
0 Thread(s)
Originally Posted by Fidget
That's as clear as mud
Simply put, the weight is the force the Earth has on an object's mass.
Ok, well, to clarify: The "weight" weight of an object is generally considered to be just the object and the force of gravity upon the object. If you were to lean on a table, you are not merely placing your weight and adding to the force the table is exerting on the ground. You would be imparting energy and thus doing work. You would first have to calculate work before you add that additional force. If you placed a book upon a table, I would not call that the weight of the table. I would say that there's the weight of the table and the weight of the book, or else the weight of the table in addition to the force exerted by the book upon the table. I wouldn't combine individual weights to be considered as a number that represents both objects, such as was done with the table and the leaning.

17. Regular Member
Join Date
Apr 2002
Location
Basement Boiler Room
Posts
22,118
Post Thanks / Like
Mentioned
0 Post(s)
Tagged
0 Thread(s)
Originally Posted by jerby
weight is the force than one body acts on another (a rock lying on a table outs weight on the table)
the force the earth has on an object is called gravity
i believe in a newtonian world, both reference objects of mass are attracting to each other. ie, the racket mass is pulling onto earth's mass too.

Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 Last

#### Posting Permissions

• You may not post new threads
• You may not post replies
• You may not post attachments
• You may not edit your posts
•