Of seeds and ranking

Discussion in 'General Forum' started by venkatesh, May 2, 2008.

  1. venkatesh

    venkatesh Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2008
    Messages:
    1,108
    Likes Received:
    2
    Occupation:
    editor
    Location:
    manila
    again, forgive me for my ignorance, but what does "seeds" in badminton mean?
    and if you watch a game on tv, they usually show a number enclosed in parentheses beside the players name. Sometimes, it's preceded with an astersik. Is this the world ranking?
     
  2. Shifty

    Shifty Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2006
    Messages:
    1,065
    Likes Received:
    3
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    New Zealand
    their rank and expected result in the tournament based on their ranking points
     
  3. treilanin

    treilanin Regular Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2006
    Messages:
    83
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Ontario, Canada
    Seeds and World Rankings are not the same thing. Seed values are separate and unique to each time a tournament is run and are based on a variety of factors like which players are attending, player's current world rankings and players history at the tournament. So the #1 seed is not always the #1 world ranked player/team.
     
  4. Shifty

    Shifty Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2006
    Messages:
    1,065
    Likes Received:
    3
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    New Zealand
    seeds are based on world ranking, at least in all the higher tournaments. i don't think it's unique because of player history etc. it's unique because in a year, world rankings shift a lot. for example, in 06 malaysian open, lin dan was seeded one although, by previous results, he hasn't done well.

    no, the #1 seed does not always have to be #1 in the world. if the #1 skips the event, the #2 in the world would become #1 seed.

    i think there's a slightly different set of rules for doubles though. it's more on the expected result than ranking points. e.g. the new Koo/Tan partnership was given a seeding of 5/8 in 2007 All England. they were far too low in terms of ranking points to be ranked 5/8 from points. but i think that is an exception. unless there is a new, awesome pair like them, even in doubles, ranking is done mainly on points.
     

Share This Page