User Tag List
Results 188 to 204 of 222
Thread: APACS review
-
08-21-2012, 07:34 AM #188
the first 3 pages on http://www.apacssports.com/products.asp?cid=13 are considered high end model from apacs. quite good for the performance and each of them have unique handling.
-
08-22-2012, 02:42 AM #189
since you have used the edgesaber 10, you are better off getting the Slayer 99 because it's even balance racket. the price is affordable than other high end racket brand.
-
08-24-2012, 12:37 PM #190
I don't know much about Apacs, i only know Yonex rackets. However, i'm considering on getting an Apacs racket. Could someone outline the major differences between tantrum and lethal?
I've heard the Lethal 70 and Tantrum 200 thrown around but i don't know much about them rackets
-
08-24-2012, 10:42 PM #191
-
08-25-2012, 06:33 AM #192
thanks for the info. I didnt know that
-
08-25-2012, 07:56 AM #193
Guys thx for ur info. Now I make it clear wat I looking for is slightly head heavy and medium stiffness. Tweet 7k 8k is slightly head heavy but each website spec is different so pls advice me. Tweet with slightly head heavy and medium stiffness. Thx in advance.
-
09-08-2012, 07:58 AM #194
i cant seem to find much on lethal 66 7u and nano speed 787 5u. does anyone know about these?
-
09-08-2012, 08:15 PM #195
Let me add more here,
For Tantrum series
- Mostly the "shot 9xx" family comes with a specifications design of
Head balance ( BP ~ 285 +/- 3 mm)
Racket weight = light ( 4U )
Flexibility = medium stiffness
As you go through to the much higher tantrum series,
- The legendary tantrum 200 (Asia market) or its other non Asia branding equivalent, Tantrum 300, the specification design will change into
Head balance ( BP ~ 285 +/- 3 mm)
Racket weight = slight heavy ( 3U ) or heavy (2U)
Flexibility = Stiff
HOWEVER, the other high end Tantrum series that is the T500, its specification has deviate from the "head balance" pattern of the Tantrum since into a design of:
Head Heavy ( BP ~ 290 +/- 3 mm)
Racket weight = slight heavy (3U)
Flexibility = medium stiffness
Playing with all of the above Tantrum series, for sure that one's specific feelings while using it will not be in anyway the same as for the other user and therefore from my own judgement, what i can summarize regardless of what the factory specification that comes with it as stated above:
Balance weight = T500 (Head Heavy) > T200/300 (balance with slight head heavy ) > TS 9xx (balance)
Racket weight = Slight heavy(3U) T200/300/500 > Light (4U)TS9XX
Flexibility = Stiff (T200/300) > Medium (T500/TS9XX)
Then.....if the T500 is a head heavy balance racket, why not just go for the Lethal series then for the choice of an offensive/head heavy racket? There is a difference in specification between the lethal series and the tantrum 500 where
T500 = Head Heavy (++) + Medium stiffness (+)
Lethal series = Head heavy (+++ @ especially the legendary 50 and 60 family /++) + stiff (+++@ especially the legendary 50 and 60 family /++)
SS
-
09-09-2012, 07:59 AM #196
has anybody tried the Lethal 18?any reviews? thanks
-
09-10-2012, 10:38 AM #197
I want to get another apacs racket.I am a beginner and barely able to do half-court clears.I am currently playing with am armortec 50 tat was a present but think after reading much its nt the best for me yet.Can someone help to reccomend a good apacs racket that can last me for some time? I guess I need abit more help with power and abit of flexibility for net-play. Appreciate it.
-
10-04-2012, 03:59 AM #198
Does anyone know what is APACS equivalent (direct clone) to Victor Bravesword 10 and 11 ?
-
10-05-2012, 12:48 AM #199
i think it should be Lethal 90.
-
10-05-2012, 01:08 AM #200
-
10-05-2012, 01:44 AM #201
-
10-06-2012, 09:17 AM #202
Haha there are pics of lee chong Wei out there with apacs rackets too. Another reason to go Apacs!
-
10-06-2012, 09:39 AM #203
I need an even balance, 3u, stiff racket. Is there an apacs one?
-
10-06-2012, 10:01 AM #204
Similar Threads
-
APACS SLAYER 99 Review
By jean_luc50 in forum Badminton Rackets / EquipmentReplies: 17: 10-31-2011, 09:44 AM -
Apacs Slayer 95 Review
By Shadowz619 in forum Badminton Rackets / EquipmentReplies: 2: 02-24-2011, 07:24 PM -
APACS Tantrum 200 vs APACS Lethal 60 : A Quick Review
By shooting stroke in forum Badminton Rackets / EquipmentReplies: 6: 07-27-2010, 10:38 AM -
any review on the new apacs VH2200
By Gold- in forum Racket Recommendation / ComparisonReplies: 1: 11-19-2009, 06:42 AM -
APACS Furious663 Review
By NiKYEAM in forum Badminton Rackets / EquipmentReplies: 3: 04-30-2008, 12:01 PM





Reply With Quote

Bookmarks