User Tag List

Page 12 of 14 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 LastLast
Results 188 to 204 of 228

Thread: APACS review

  1. #188
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Setapak, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysi
    Posts
    214
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by waran_21 View Post
    Wat u mean by high end? Which series is high end? I am ready to try.
    the first 3 pages on http://www.apacssports.com/products.asp?cid=13 are considered high end model from apacs. quite good for the performance and each of them have unique handling.

  2. #189
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    233
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    since you have used the edgesaber 10, you are better off getting the Slayer 99 because it's even balance racket. the price is affordable than other high end racket brand.

  3. #190
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Ipoh
    Posts
    7
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I don't know much about Apacs, i only know Yonex rackets. However, i'm considering on getting an Apacs racket. Could someone outline the major differences between tantrum and lethal?

    I've heard the Lethal 70 and Tantrum 200 thrown around but i don't know much about them rackets

  4. #191
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Setapak, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysi
    Posts
    214
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by drink View Post
    I don't know much about Apacs, i only know Yonex rackets. However, i'm considering on getting an Apacs racket. Could someone outline the major differences between tantrum and lethal?

    I've heard the Lethal 70 and Tantrum 200 thrown around but i don't know much about them rackets
    tantrum = balance racket (tantrum200/300/500)
    lethal = head heavy racket(lethal50/60/70/90/100/110)

  5. #192
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Brunei Darussalam
    Posts
    1,707
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    thanks for the info. I didnt know that

  6. #193
    New Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    singapore
    Posts
    4
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Guys thx for ur info. Now I make it clear wat I looking for is slightly head heavy and medium stiffness. Tweet 7k 8k is slightly head heavy but each website spec is different so pls advice me. Tweet with slightly head heavy and medium stiffness. Thx in advance.

  7. #194
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    7
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    i cant seem to find much on lethal 66 7u and nano speed 787 5u. does anyone know about these?

  8. #195
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Malaysia
    Posts
    771
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wuzent View Post
    tantrum = balance racket (tantrum200/300/500)
    lethal = head heavy racket(lethal50/60/70/90/100/110)
    Let me add more here,

    For Tantrum series

    - Mostly the "shot 9xx" family comes with a specifications design of

    Head balance ( BP ~ 285 +/- 3 mm)
    Racket weight = light ( 4U )
    Flexibility = medium stiffness

    As you go through to the much higher tantrum series,

    - The legendary tantrum 200 (Asia market) or its other non Asia branding equivalent, Tantrum 300, the specification design will change into

    Head balance ( BP ~ 285 +/- 3 mm)
    Racket weight = slight heavy ( 3U ) or heavy (2U)
    Flexibility = Stiff

    HOWEVER, the other high end Tantrum series that is the T500, its specification has deviate from the "head balance" pattern of the Tantrum since into a design of:

    Head Heavy ( BP ~ 290 +/- 3 mm)
    Racket weight = slight heavy (3U)
    Flexibility = medium stiffness

    Playing with all of the above Tantrum series, for sure that one's specific feelings while using it will not be in anyway the same as for the other user and therefore from my own judgement, what i can summarize regardless of what the factory specification that comes with it as stated above:

    Balance weight = T500 (Head Heavy) > T200/300 (balance with slight head heavy ) > TS 9xx (balance)
    Racket weight = Slight heavy(3U) T200/300/500 > Light (4U)TS9XX
    Flexibility = Stiff (T200/300) > Medium (T500/TS9XX)

    Then.....if the T500 is a head heavy balance racket, why not just go for the Lethal series then for the choice of an offensive/head heavy racket? There is a difference in specification between the lethal series and the tantrum 500 where

    T500 = Head Heavy (++) + Medium stiffness (+)
    Lethal series = Head heavy (+++ @ especially the legendary 50 and 60 family /++) + stiff (+++@ especially the legendary 50 and 60 family /++)

    SS

  9. #196
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    128
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    has anybody tried the Lethal 18?any reviews? thanks

  10. #197
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    7
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I want to get another apacs racket.I am a beginner and barely able to do half-court clears.I am currently playing with am armortec 50 tat was a present but think after reading much its nt the best for me yet.Can someone help to reccomend a good apacs racket that can last me for some time? I guess I need abit more help with power and abit of flexibility for net-play. Appreciate it.

  11. #198
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    580
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Does anyone know what is APACS equivalent (direct clone) to Victor Bravesword 10 and 11 ?

  12. #199
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    233
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    i think it should be Lethal 90.

  13. #200
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    MY/SG
    Posts
    292
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by enuun View Post
    I want to get another apacs racket.I am a beginner and barely able to do half-court clears.I am currently playing with am armortec 50 tat was a present but think after reading much its nt the best for me yet.Can someone help to reccomend a good apacs racket that can last me for some time? I guess I need abit more help with power and abit of flexibility for net-play. Appreciate it.
    Hi Enuun,
    What is your budget and your playing style?

  14. #201
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    580
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by irwan_kho View Post
    i think it should be Lethal 90.
    Ok, thanks for the pointer

  15. #202
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Singapore/Malaysia
    Posts
    73
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Haha there are pics of lee chong Wei out there with apacs rackets too. Another reason to go Apacs!

  16. #203
    Regular Member dbswansea's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Swansea
    Posts
    1,115
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I need an even balance, 3u, stiff racket. Is there an apacs one?

  17. #204
    Regular Member leo11's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    183
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dbswansea View Post
    I need an even balance, 3u, stiff racket. Is there an apacs one?
    Tantrum 200 / 300

Page 12 of 14 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. APACS Tantrum 200 vs APACS Lethal 60 : A Quick Review
    By shooting stroke in forum Badminton Rackets / Equipment
    Replies: 8
    : 11-09-2014, 09:26 AM
  2. APACS SLAYER 99 Review
    By jean_luc50 in forum Badminton Rackets / Equipment
    Replies: 17
    : 10-31-2011, 10:44 AM
  3. Apacs Slayer 95 Review
    By Shadowz619 in forum Badminton Rackets / Equipment
    Replies: 2
    : 02-24-2011, 08:24 PM
  4. any review on the new apacs VH2200
    By Gold- in forum Racket Recommendation / Comparison
    Replies: 1
    : 11-19-2009, 07:42 AM
  5. APACS Furious663 Review
    By NiKYEAM in forum Badminton Rackets / Equipment
    Replies: 3
    : 04-30-2008, 01:01 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •