User Tag List
Results 18 to 34 of 105
-
07-29-2008, 06:04 PM #18
-
07-29-2008, 06:46 PM #19
-
07-29-2008, 09:20 PM #20
-
07-29-2008, 09:24 PM #21
Yes, I am biased
(aren't we all more or less?), but always open to new knowledge, and facts 
And I did not take the Yonex rep word as is, thats why I was asking you if you had any solid figures on weights... Which maybe even could be interesting given the original posters question in the thread :-)
/TLast edited by twobeer; 07-29-2008 at 09:27 PM.
-
07-29-2008, 09:38 PM #22
I just opened 1 tube of M300 and 1 M500, Sorry, I do not have M350 at this time.
avg of 2xM300 = 5.05g
avg of 2xM500 = 5.10g
Please note that the skirt of M300 and M500 are different.
I might get a M350 this weekend to do some measurement and see the BP also. I will not do flight test because my swing might not be consistent.Last edited by silentheart; 07-29-2008 at 09:40 PM.
-
07-29-2008, 09:41 PM #23
Nice
, Cooler-Yonex 1-0 
(and btw thx for the effort, & info :-) )
Did you weigh them separately and averaged? any deviance between individual ones?
/T
P.S. it could be interesting to compare this to the weight of international-tournament-shuttles (feather). where 5.0 gram would be a speed 77 shuttle, and 5.1 gram would be speed 78. so that would mean 5.05 would be 77 1/2 ... D.S.Last edited by twobeer; 07-29-2008 at 09:56 PM.
-
07-29-2008, 09:53 PM #24
-
07-29-2008, 10:46 PM #25
Dear T,
The shuttles are weighted separately then average. Deviation is 0.1g for M300. 0.0g for M500. I will try to get a tube of M350 and weight all 6 shuttles in each 3 model this weekend.
Dear Cooler,
They are med speed. You know me and you already knew the answer. Thank you for the reminder.
I love scientific investigation... Good night gentlemen.
-
07-29-2008, 11:21 PM #26
Lest We Forget?
http://www.badmintoncentral.com/foru...highlight=4.85Last edited by cooler; 07-29-2008 at 11:28 PM.
-
07-29-2008, 11:21 PM #27
-
07-29-2008, 11:25 PM #28
-
07-29-2008, 11:55 PM #29
Shutter speed designation used to come in 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, etc to denote its weight 0f 4.8g, 4.9g, 5.0g, etc. This was not a very accurate classification so the current speed classification of 75, 76, 77, 78, etc is preferred. This system uses a 30cm distance difference between one grade and the next speed grade. Surprisingly this system was in use many years ago, even by nylon shuttles which used to come in speed grades of 76, 77, etc. Both the weight and the diameter of the feathers shuttlecock are the major factors in shuttle speed.
-
07-30-2008, 04:58 AM #30
So according to cooler 350 is heavier than 300, and 500 is heavier than 350.. But the measuers from SH seems to contradict that as 500 seems only slighter heavier than 300.. So how could it be heavier than 350? Or is this just incosistensys because of these shuttles being so cheap

/Twobeer
-
07-30-2008, 05:17 AM #31
How about testing Mavis 300, 350, 370, and 500 for speed on the courts? Do they land within a distance range of 46cm, measured from a point 53cm from the back boundary line towards the front?
-
07-30-2008, 07:23 AM #32
That "test" seems kind of silly, as conditions like humidity, temperature, sea-level etc. will affect the result :-), Thats why they are made in different speeds in the first place , so in essence at one venue a "medium" 350 may have the correct speed, on another it will not...
If any of the 3 speeds available are not good for the venue, there is no solution to adjusting the speed permanently on these plastic shuttle
.
/Twobeer
-
07-30-2008, 08:13 AM #33
-
07-30-2008, 08:32 AM #34
Similar Threads
-
Comparison of the Yonex Mavis 300 and the Yonex Mavis 370
By David1990 in forum ShuttlecockReplies: 14: 05-25-2009, 07:12 PM -
Yonex Mavis 300 or 350?
By eddiemon in forum ShuttlecockReplies: 270: 07-15-2008, 01:24 PM -
Slow Mavis 370 vs. Middle Mavis 300
By St00pid in forum ShuttlecockReplies: 8: 05-25-2007, 01:58 AM -
Yonex Mavis 500
By pentium4 in forum ShuttlecockReplies: 24: 11-20-2006, 11:07 PM -
Yonex Mavis 300
By newbie in forum Badminton Rackets / EquipmentReplies: 14: 02-04-2002, 06:46 PM





Reply With Quote


Bookmarks