Lately I've been wondering. I've seen that a lot of players like the old rally system and a lot of other players like the new rally system. Sensible enough right? So what I'm thinking is that like we try to find a median between the rally systems. I know that die hard fans love to watch long and intense matches, and I know that players tire out a lot after half an hour or so. Why not try to balance? I was thinking maybe like there would be 3/5 games. Or there would be like 31 points instead of 21. I'd like to read other people's perspectives and inputs on this. So, what do you think?
http://www.badmintoncentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=39849 http://www.badmintoncentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=27000 i personally think best of 5X21 points games would be cool
Shortening the game is one thing. The other I suspect is the distribution of match times. The old system definitely produces greater variation in match length.
Even the well-conditioned pros have tough time playing 3x21. 5x21 would be a killer. How about 5x15 with the new scoring?
