Hendra Setiawan and Lilyana Natsir

Discussion in 'Professional Players' started by xlasher, Jul 10, 2008.

  1. xlasher

    xlasher Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2006
    Messages:
    424
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    MD,USA
    What y'all think about this??

    I think they can be lethal.....:cool::cool::cool:
     
  2. huangkwokhau

    huangkwokhau Regular Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2007
    Messages:
    18,486
    Likes Received:
    87
    Occupation:
    sales & design
    Location:
    everywhere
    I think Kido/Butet is better as Hendra could not smash harder than Kido...
     
  3. Makunouchi

    Makunouchi Regular Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2005
    Messages:
    215
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    Badminton Addict
    Location:
    Alabang, Philippines
    I agree. Hendra usually is lethal at the front and markis at the back. Hendra and butet would be crowding the front court area and nobody would cover the rear court.
     
  4. Sandy

    Sandy Regular Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2002
    Messages:
    12,100
    Likes Received:
    6
    Location:
    Jakarta
    Hendra in front and Kido in back side was created by their opponent. Like Luluk in front and Alvent in back side.

    I believe Hendra's smash is harder than Kido, more dangerous if he play in back side.
    Their opponents who prefer Kido in back because he is shorter.
    Then Hendra improved his netting skill and Kido improved in jump smash.
     
  5. george@chongwei

    george@chongwei Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2007
    Messages:
    29,923
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    MIA
    yeah, i must agree too that hendra setiawan smash is harder than kido.
     
  6. dini_chantik

    dini_chantik Regular Member

    Joined:
    May 21, 2008
    Messages:
    84
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    writer
    Location:
    Indonesia
    i agree too, hendra is better than luluk hadiyanto, hendra is the best he..he..hee
     

Share This Page