User Tag List

Results 1 to 13 of 13
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    61
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default dont smash hard after newly strung racket?

    I've been hearing alot of people breaking their strings like 15 strings in 6 days, and I once, when I was really nooby, heard some person say that after you string a racket, you shouldnt smash hard, or do full on clears, because the strings have to settle into the racket.

    This might be true because I once broke BG66 strings in my first week using them and in that week I was training hard smashes and clears.

    So for those people who go though packs of strings a month, maybe you should leave the strings to settle into the racket before enduring hard hits?

    I just realized my title doesnt make much sense =/
    Last edited by E.Cheng; 07-14-2008 at 06:33 AM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Hong Kong
    Posts
    6,482
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    A racquet plays at its best when newly strung with new strings. Smashes and almost any stroke do not come any better than with new strings. New strings break because of mishits.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    New York, US
    Posts
    10,276
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Break 15 strings in 6 days mostly due to bad gromments or powerful mis-hit. Of course, if he's LD, that's another story.

    Seriously, I don't think there's any durability difference between a 3 hrs old string and a 2 weeks old string. Many players like to let the string to "settle in", mainly due to control reasons, but not durability.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    3,644
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LazyBuddy View Post
    Break 15 strings in 6 days mostly due to bad gromments or powerful mis-hit. Of course, if he's LD, that's another story.

    Seriously, I don't think there's any durability difference between a 3 hrs old string and a 2 weeks old string. Many players like to let the string to "settle in", mainly due to control reasons, but not durability.
    There is definitely a difference because the tension would have decreased

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Richmond, BC
    Posts
    5,190
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    E. Cheng,

    Lol, sounds like that stuff is all made up. So using this concept mention, put that into perspective of the pro players. Makes absolutely no sense because the players would get their rackets stringed before their actual match.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    3,644
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Why wouldn't you play with a newly strung racket? Leaving it over time will only reduce the tension making you play different.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    61
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by phandrew View Post
    Why wouldn't you play with a newly strung racket? Leaving it over time will only reduce the tension making you play different.
    No, I meant by like playing it softly, then after about 2hrs of play, do whatever you like. But it seems its not true, but anyway I've never been strong enough to break strings within a week of playing.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    New York, US
    Posts
    10,276
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by phandrew View Post
    There is definitely a difference because the tension would have decreased

    In theory, yes. However, in theory I can also argue there's a difference in durability in between a newly strung racket, and a racket being used just for 3 hrs, as the tension tends to drop with the highest rate (play or not) at the beginning.

    When we talk about the string durability, we need to look at the overall life span. Whether the string lose 0.2% or 0.5% or even 50% of the "life" after your 1st smash, I don't know.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    3,644
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Would you want the string to break in as fast as possible or slowly over time?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    61
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LazyBuddy View Post
    In theory, yes. However, in theory I can also argue there's a difference in durability in between a newly strung racket, and a racket being used just for 3 hrs, as the tension tends to drop with the highest rate (play or not) at the beginning.

    When we talk about the string durability, we need to look at the overall life span. Whether the string lose 0.2% or 0.5% or even 50% of the "life" after your 1st smash, I don't know.
    YES THAT IT, thats what he told me, he was like because your string loses tension faster if you play hard and when it losses tension too quickly it may break. When the strings settle in, its harder to lose tension. Well I think thats what he said.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    New York, US
    Posts
    10,276
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by E.Cheng View Post
    when it losses tension too quickly it may break.

    I really don't understand what kinda theory is that. Isn't the lower the tension, the "safer" it is for not breaking the string?

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    3,644
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LazyBuddy View Post
    I really don't understand what kinda theory is that. Isn't the lower the tension, the "safer" it is for not breaking the string?
    Lower tension on the same string will last longer than higher tension.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Richmond, BC
    Posts
    5,190
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Well all the strings would go through the break-in period before they stabilize after the string elongates as the tension drops.

    For the professionals, that is a different story as mentioned earlier they would get the strings stringed before their actual match so they will have a fresh set of strings when they play.

Similar Threads

  1. How to tell what string tension on newly puchased racket?
    By mttk1853 in forum Badminton String
    Replies: 6
    : 08-12-2010, 09:49 AM
  2. Can a newly strung racket be untied and restrung again with the same string?
    By Phydhel in forum Badminton Stringing Techniques & Tools
    Replies: 104
    : 05-19-2010, 08:10 AM
  3. Newly restrung racket
    By billbobfrd in forum Badminton String
    Replies: 7
    : 04-08-2009, 09:34 PM
  4. Favourite rackets for smash base hard hitter
    By helloworld in forum Badminton Rackets / Equipment
    Replies: 3
    : 01-09-2008, 07:31 PM
  5. How to do a hard backhand smash
    By ttktom in forum Techniques / Training
    Replies: 9
    : 08-28-2003, 04:33 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •