Thread: Ti-10 vs Arcsaber 10
11-11-2008, 07:53 AM #35
me? guess who
11-11-2008, 07:41 PM #36
11-12-2008, 11:26 PM #37
Thanks for your info bro...
i am looking for your review, /heh....
11-13-2008, 11:51 AM #38
Today test all Ti-10 generation....and agree with @smichz only the different is very close.....1st gen is very stiff and very powerful but not far than 2&3 gen, same condition for manuver, defense, etc with all of them very close in result. If i close my eyes maybe only 1st gen i can feel the different but that because the stiffness.....more solid feel than others. 2 games with 1st gen, 1 game with 3rd gen and 2nd gen using for stroke with my friend before going home.....
No need long time to adapt those racket very easy to adjust the timing, only power must be adjust since the 2nd gen using different string and tension
11-13-2008, 07:49 PM #39
Last night i tested my ti10 3rd gen..(double player)
A good racquet i think..
Very easy to drive and lob.
For smash , ARC10 have a little bit more power than ti 10, just a little bit..
Good control on net play.
Ti10 3rd gen NGB98 26 lbs
ARC10 NBG98 25 lbs
ARC10 seem more solid and have a good anti frame vibration than ti10.
Overall, there's not much different performance between both of them (which i can't accept ), unless you have strong power for smashing, maybe will have different result than mine..
Maybe i should increase ARC 10 tension to 26 lbs or 27 lbs to get the best performance.
I'm just an all around player, not an offensif player and still
improve my skill..
Last edited by Openg; 11-13-2008 at 07:51 PM.
08-08-2011, 04:58 AM #40
Hi all....can i know which one is more head heavier ??
Between Ti10 /Arc10 ...TQ
08-08-2011, 11:11 AM #41
By ghooga in forum Buy & SellReplies: 5: 12-31-2011, 10:33 AM
By observer in forum Badminton Rackets / EquipmentReplies: 5: 12-07-2011, 11:33 PM
By memo1820 in forum Buy & SellReplies: 1: 11-24-2011, 12:49 PM
By Polaroid in forum Racket Recommendation / ComparisonReplies: 9: 04-05-2011, 02:25 PM
By blindfury in forum Buy & SellReplies: 16: 02-02-2011, 07:41 PM