User Tag List

Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: NS8k at Ti-10

  1. #1
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    50
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default NS8k at Ti-10

    What are the balance points for a 3UG4 NS8k and a 3UG5 Ti-10 (Gen 3)? And are these rackets considered to be on "opposite ends of the spectrum" in regards to their associated playing style?

    Thanks.

  2. #2
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Canada, BC, GVA
    Posts
    952
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Precisely correct. NS8k is a head-light racquet (defensive), and Ti-10 is a head-heavy racquet (offensive). However, you may use it differently depend on your style of playing.

  3. #3
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    50
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Do you have specific balance points for them? That'd be great.

  4. #4
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    2,272
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Ti-10 is actually around even balance....not really head heavy like Armortec racquets.

  5. #5
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    50
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Well, here's the thing that bothers me...I decided to measure the BPs of the two rackets, since it was bothering me that my Ti-10 felt a lot head heavier than my NS8k. Here are the results:

    NS8k (3U G4)
    Original grip
    Strung @ 24 lbs w/ BG 80
    BP: 292 mm

    Ti-Gen (3U G5, 3rd Gen Purple)
    Original grip
    Strung @ 23 lbs w/ BG 80
    BP: 295.5 mm


    There's only a 3.5mm difference in the balance points of the two rackets, yet it feels like a lot more...

    Now I don't know if the different feelings I get from the rackets are psychological or reality...


    Do the BPs look wrong at all?

  6. #6
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Canada, BC, GVA
    Posts
    952
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Athelete1234 View Post
    Ti-10 is actually around even balance....not really head heavy like Armortec racquets.
    Thank you Athelete for clarifying. I assumed Ti-10 as being Head-heavy since the last time I tried it was pretty darn heavy compared with my NS8k. Probably the modification of my friend's Ti-10 altered its BP towards head-heavy.

    I apologize if I created any confusion.

  7. #7
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    50
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Anyways...do the BPs of my rackets look normal at all? The NS8k seems to be on the head heavier side of headlight, no?

  8. #8
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    WA, USA
    Posts
    143
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    David, to answer your question, take a look at this previously posted thread on BC.

    http://www.badmintoncentral.com/foru...ad.php?t=37751

    It can be seen that there are not major differences in balance points, but they seem to make enough of a contributing factor as to feel different. as for accuracy, it is also noted in this thread that the overgrip, grip size, and strings can also make a large difference in weight accuracy.

  9. #9
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    50
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Hmm...I have the same strings on both racket, and both rackets are in the original grip...

    Does that mean the grip size is what makes my Ti-10 seem a lot head heavier than my NS8k, even though their BPs are only 3.5 mm apart?

Similar Threads

  1. WTB: NS8K (old version) 3U or WTT NS9KX for NS8K
    By AzNxYuNGstuH in forum Buy & Sell - Read the rules sticky before you post
    Replies: 0
    : 05-06-2008, 06:56 PM
  2. ns8k sweetspot
    By __Lam in forum Badminton Rackets / Equipment
    Replies: 6
    : 07-04-2006, 12:03 AM
  3. Why is $NS8k < $Arm800OFF/DEF ?
    By bchaiyow in forum Badminton Rackets / Equipment
    Replies: 14
    : 11-18-2005, 04:37 AM
  4. Win NS8K
    By Natrificial in forum Badminton Rackets / Equipment
    Replies: 4
    : 11-01-2005, 05:32 PM
  5. NS8k or 7K?
    By jerby in forum Racket Recommendation / Comparison
    Replies: 5
    : 10-09-2005, 11:02 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •