Results 69 to 85 of 97
11-29-2008, 12:05 AM #69
11-29-2008, 12:35 AM #70
11-29-2008, 02:52 AM #71
come on , Lin Dan!
Lin Dan should win this match
really...LD vs TH make me more nervous than LD vs LCW...dunno why
maybe because despite of TH's performance lately..he's still considered as one of great badminton player in the world and also an arc nemesis for Lin Dan
let the best match comes tonight...
JIA YOU, LIN DAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
11-29-2008, 02:56 AM #72
11-29-2008, 02:57 AM #73
11-29-2008, 04:18 AM #74
ENOUGH with the "TH is a selfish git", "LD is the image of purity" nonsense. It's NOT NEEDED.
A match needs time to come to it's conclusion, and a perfect example is the MD just now between Fuzzys and KKK/TBH, if the match had finished early, who could have known Fuzzys would come back and win it? Therefore you can't base a win (a real win earned through being the better player on the day) on a few points in THIS CONTEXT.
Last edited by phaarix; 11-29-2008 at 04:31 AM.
11-29-2008, 04:24 AM #75
11-29-2008, 04:50 AM #76
A H2H statistical analysis must include all H2H encounters, especially official matches. If u say a match stop at 4-1 is invalid but a match stop at 20-18 is valid, what score is needed before it is considered a valid match??????
When TH step onto the court, and after the umpire said 'play', the match is valid. Even if TH had WO at 0-0 score for any voluntary reason, TH had lost.
TH quit voluntary. Beside for involuntary reasons like injury or an act of nature ( terrorist attack in stadium), any voluntary WO is a lost, even at score 0-0. If u accept a WO at score 20-18 as a valid lost, the same WO logic applies to 0-0, or 4-1 score as well.
Last edited by cooler; 11-29-2008 at 04:55 AM.
11-29-2008, 05:10 AM #77
11-29-2008, 05:16 AM #78
11-29-2008, 05:24 AM #79
And still you're not getting the point - The difference between an official match, and a match which actually contributes to a halfway useful statistic. Yes, Taufik lost the match. Jeeezz I'm not denying that... I'm saying it's not useful to include it statistically IF you're going to use that statistic as basis for an argument (based on comparison).
Last edited by phaarix; 11-29-2008 at 05:30 AM.
11-29-2008, 05:27 AM #80
like the joker said :
"Why So Serious?"
just enjoy the game...
11-29-2008, 05:31 AM #81
11-29-2008, 06:11 AM #82
OK, even if i just use the two score examples for statistical debate, my point is EVEN MORE valid:
(A) A 4-1 score is a 3 point spread, a 20-18 score is a 2 point spread. Since u accepted a WO at 20-18 score is a valid lost, the 4-1 score with the larger 3 point spread IS EVEN MORE indicative of a H2H lost
(B) TH earned 25% of game point (1 out of 4) before walking out. Since u accepted a WO at 20-18 is a valid lost, 18 point represent 90% of the game point. Why earning 90% of the game or 18 point is a lost but earning a measly 25% or 1 point is not a lost???
using pure statistical comparision as u had demanded, it clearly showed that your premise of 4-1 WO by TH as not being a valid data point for H2H comparison doesn't hold any truth. Actually, this statistical comparison supported my position even more so.
11-29-2008, 06:28 AM #83
In a test of probability - repeated 5? Or 38 times?
I think that's all I need to say.
Last edited by phaarix; 11-29-2008 at 06:31 AM.
11-29-2008, 06:44 AM #84
Last edited by cooler; 11-29-2008 at 06:47 AM.
11-29-2008, 06:57 AM #85
LOL! Go LD, show us you're the real bad boy! LD will win this time.
LOLOL! LOL rules!!
By limsy in forum China Open / Hong Kong Open / India GP 2010Replies: 371: 12-10-2010, 08:40 PM
By george@chongwei in forum Hong Kong Open / China Open 2009Replies: 531: 11-17-2009, 02:04 AM
By george@chongwei in forum China Open (2) / Hong Kong Open / Vietnam Open 2008Replies: 401: 12-13-2008, 04:59 PM
By george@chongwei in forum China Open (2) / Hong Kong Open / Vietnam Open 2008Replies: 257: 11-30-2008, 01:57 AM
By george@chongwei in forum China Open (2) / Hong Kong Open / Vietnam Open 2008Replies: 697: 11-28-2008, 09:06 PM