# Thread: TH or Lin Dan to final Hongkong SS

1. Originally Posted by cooler
1. seem like dont understand probability and odds. Next time, go ask a booky which odd of losing is higher, 1 in 4 or 18 to 20 LOL

2. equivalent to FUTURE CHANCE OF TH LOSING.

u should pay me for all these statistic classes i've given u
1. Ahhhhh.... like talking to a brick wall. You get much more accurate idea if you have more numbers when you're dealing with probability. You don't even get what I'm saying do you?? >_>... Like for instance: Early numbers for US election count put John McCain ahead (when they just started counting), as the day went on, with more numbers it was obvious that Obama was winning by a mile.

2. Losing by walking out at the start of a game. It's not equivalent to a full match. Change the record...

2. By the way... Taufik was just leading 4-1 in the first set... but did he win it? No .

3. Originally Posted by phaarix
By the way... Taufik was just leading 4-1 in the first set... but did he win it? No .
i also have said LD would be generous today. He let TH lead most of way, on both sets.

say what u want, odds say TH will lose and statistic was right, TH lost, again.

4. Originally Posted by cooler
i also have said LD would be generous today. He let TH lead most of way, on both sets.
So what? What's that got to do with it? I didn't say anything about that :S.

Originally Posted by cooler
say what u want, odds say TH will lose and statistic was right, TH lost, again.
I wasn't even talking about whether Taufik would win or lose! I just found counting the HKO 06 match in H2H ridiculous.

And yes you're absolutely right, statistics say that chances are Taufik would lose this one, whether you count the HKO 06 or not. But like I said, that's not what I was talking about. Why do I repeatedly have to clarify what I'm actually talking about? I feel I'm being clear enough...

5. Originally Posted by phaarix
By the way... Taufik was just leading 4-1 in the first set... but did he win it? No .
yes, but there is one big difference, LD did not WO.

6. Originally Posted by phaarix
So what? What's that got to do with it? I didn't say anything about that :S.
but i did, based on 06 HKO WO statistical record, even a WO one.

7. Originally Posted by cooler
i also have said LD would be generous today. He let TH lead most of way, on both sets.

say what u want, odds say TH will lose and statistic was right, TH lost, again.
Stats tell a chilling tale
Everyone has bad H2H's against LD , barring Chen Hong and previously PSH, but now PSH has nothing over him.

8. Originally Posted by volcom
but now PSH has nothing over him.
Exaggeration.

Originally Posted by cooler
yes, but there is one big difference, LD did not WO.

9. Originally Posted by phaarix
Exaggeration.
You can say that again when he actually beats LD in the future.
He had his moments in 07.

10. Originally Posted by volcom
You can say that again when he actually beats LD in the future.
He had his moments in 07.
This is getting silly . Guess I'll leave it here unless anyone has anything worthwhile to add.

11. Originally Posted by volcom
You can say that again when he actually beats LD in the future.
He had his moments in 07.
it just show that some people are now conceding that LCW and TH can't do the job and now backing their new idol PSH to do the job

12. nice to chat with u taufik-ist, until we meet again here on BF for next LD vs TH match, i guess u will be sliding back into your hole

Page 6 of 6 First 1 2 3 4 5 6

#### Posting Permissions

• You may not post new threads
• You may not post replies
• You may not post attachments
• You may not edit your posts
•