User Tag List

Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    bukit batok
    Posts
    44
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Aerosensa - 10 or 20 & mavis 370, which 1 better?

    Not considering the durability of the shuttlecocks, which 1 is better?
    AS - 10 & AS - 20
    or
    mavis 370


    I wanted to buy the shuttlecocks but wondering will the cheap feature shuttlecock still perform better than the high-end nylon shuttlecocks (without considering durability)?

    Thank you.

  2. #2
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Nottingham, UK
    Posts
    1,719
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    In terms of quality etc yes, the Aerosensas will be better. In terms of longevity, obviously, the Mavis synthetics would be better. How similar in price to AS20s are AS3s? They sound considerably worse but are in fact, the "practise model" of AS30.

  3. #3
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    bukit batok
    Posts
    44
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    so which means if i want to have a better quality but not longevity, then even the cheapest feature shuttlecocks still perform better than the mavis shuttlecocks?

  4. #4
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Nottingham, UK
    Posts
    1,719
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by stanley85 View Post
    so which means if i want to have a better quality but not longevity, then even the cheapest feature shuttlecocks still perform better than the mavis shuttlecocks?
    As long as they're not the really cheap ones (Tesco Active equipment or something), then yes. Also, I'd avoid Head and Wilson shuttles like the plague; they're not particularly cheap, have no durability and their flight isn't that great either. Decathlon's own brand shuttles (not sure if you have Decathlon in Scotland) are incredibly cheap 7 a dozen but surprisingly good. Not like Yonex F-90s or anything but when you consider one tube of F-90s equates to more than 4 tubs of Decathlon shuttles, they're really quite good.

  5. #5
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    bukit batok
    Posts
    44
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    hmm...looks like if i want to consider a better playing quality shuttlecocks then It is always better to have ""feather"" shuttlecocks instead of getting nylon shuttlecocks..even it's low-end feather shuttlecocks.

    Thank you.

    ***sorry for the wrong spelling of feather (feature) in earlier post.

Similar Threads

  1. Mavis 350 vs Mavis 2000
    By ioxyg3n520 in forum Shuttlecock
    Replies: 24
    : 10-14-2013, 07:25 PM
  2. Replies: 0
    : 07-17-2011, 09:28 AM
  3. Aerosensa 03??
    By psychy in forum Shuttlecock
    Replies: 6
    : 01-19-2010, 04:40 AM
  4. Replies: 14
    : 05-25-2009, 08:12 PM
  5. Slow Mavis 370 vs. Middle Mavis 300
    By St00pid in forum Shuttlecock
    Replies: 8
    : 05-25-2007, 02:58 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •