Results 1 to 5 of 5
01-24-2009, 09:43 AM #1
Aerosensa - 10 or 20 & mavis 370, which 1 better?
Not considering the durability of the shuttlecocks, which 1 is better?
AS - 10 & AS - 20
I wanted to buy the shuttlecocks but wondering will the cheap feature shuttlecock still perform better than the high-end nylon shuttlecocks (without considering durability)?
01-24-2009, 09:52 AM #2
In terms of quality etc yes, the Aerosensas will be better. In terms of longevity, obviously, the Mavis synthetics would be better. How similar in price to AS20s are AS3s? They sound considerably worse but are in fact, the "practise model" of AS30.
01-24-2009, 10:08 AM #3
so which means if i want to have a better quality but not longevity, then even the cheapest feature shuttlecocks still perform better than the mavis shuttlecocks?
01-24-2009, 10:18 AM #4
01-24-2009, 10:44 AM #5
hmm...looks like if i want to consider a better playing quality shuttlecocks then It is always better to have ""feather"" shuttlecocks instead of getting nylon shuttlecocks..even it's low-end feather shuttlecocks.
***sorry for the wrong spelling of feather (feature) in earlier post.
By ioxyg3n520 in forum ShuttlecockReplies: 24: 10-14-2013, 07:25 PM
By bbi2004 in forum ShuttlecockReplies: 0: 07-17-2011, 09:28 AM
By psychy in forum ShuttlecockReplies: 6: 01-19-2010, 04:40 AM
By David1990 in forum ShuttlecockReplies: 14: 05-25-2009, 08:12 PM
By St00pid in forum ShuttlecockReplies: 8: 05-25-2007, 02:58 AM