User Tag List

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 17 of 26
  1. #1
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    sivakasi
    Posts
    14
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Suggest Head Heavy Flexible Rackets

    I was told that Head Heavy Flexible Rackets are good for shots & control.

    1. Please suggest me a few a Head Heavy (not tooo heavy) flexible Rackets

    2. How to find out "Head heavy racket" by its Specification?

    Please reply

    Last edited by suprabhat; 01-28-2009 at 07:01 AM.

  2. #2
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    1,271
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Yonex Armortec 150
    if flexible about 'flexible', try the AT300
    there are countless other models out there with these same specifications.
    Try looking at Dinkalot's racket review and if that fails, try reading and searching for a racket with the same balance, from a different company.

    Head Heavy can be defined as having a balance point greater than 295-300. generally, when you pick it up, the head will feel weighted.

  3. #3
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    West Lafayette
    Posts
    440
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    the good old TI10 !!!!!

    flex yet head heavy for attack....

  4. #4
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Disneyland
    Posts
    960
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Yonex AT900T is good for you.

    Quote Originally Posted by suprabhat View Post
    I was told that Head Heavy Flexible Rackets are good for shots & control.

    1. Please suggest me a few a Head Heavy (not tooo heavy) flexible Rackets

    2. How to find out "Head heavy racket" by its Specification?

    Please reply


  5. #5
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    2,272
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by alexkho View Post
    the good old TI10 !!!!!

    flex yet head heavy for attack....


    Ti-10 is freaking stiff...all of them!!!

  6. #6
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    West Lafayette
    Posts
    440
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    come on ... it's not stiff .......
    i have try the red version and yellow version
    they very flex .....

  7. #7
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    1,499
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    So far, most head heavy racquets are stiff mid stiff/stiff racquet. It is rare to find a racquet that is head heavy and flexy and even rarer if it is light (4U).

    So far, I only know the Carlton Nanolite 9500 fits all the requirements.

  8. #8
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Basement Boiler Room
    Posts
    22,118
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by alexkho View Post
    the good old TI10 !!!!!

    flex yet head heavy for attack....
    yes, an used original one even better

  9. #9
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Basement Boiler Room
    Posts
    22,118
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Athelete1234 View Post


    Ti-10 is freaking stiff...all of them!!!
    u gotten fooled by the brochures,
    or u got weak arm
    how can u say all of them? later version are built differently
    Last edited by cooler; 01-28-2009 at 06:32 PM.

  10. #10
    Regular Member jhirata's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Wellington, New Zealand, New Z
    Posts
    2,488
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    MP88. Flexible, and rather head-heavy. Hard to find though.

  11. #11
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    1,645
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    - Victor SuperWave 33C (P is stiff but C is quite flexible).
    - Proace Thunderbolt 1-3. 5 is a little too head heavy but still okay flex.

    Also take a look at Ashaways. They make a lot of flexible rackets.

  12. #12
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    2,272
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cooler View Post
    u gotten fooled by the brochures,
    or u got weak arm
    how can u say all of them? later version are built differently
    Cause they're all stiff?? I don't think anybody else would consider them flexible and put them in the same league as say, MP88. I didn't say they were extra stiff...just stiff in general.

  13. #13
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Surabaya - Indonesia
    Posts
    836
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    at700.............

  14. #14
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    M'sia
    Posts
    295
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Flexible, MP22 light, Gosen PKS , Kason Carbon 1.0 ....

  15. #15
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    sivakasi
    Posts
    14
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Dear jymbalaya, you have inform "Head Heavy" as balance point greater than 295-300

    In some Rackets Specification (like wilson) have mentioned balance as 29cm, 29.5cm. How to read this data input and find out head heavy racket.

  16. #16
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Republic of Singapore
    Posts
    44
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cooler View Post
    u gotten fooled by the brochures,
    or u got weak arm
    how can u say all of them? later version are built differently
    Are the newer and older Ti-10 the same?
    I've never used it before but am wondering.

    Are the newer Ti10 just equally as good?

  17. #17
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Asia
    Posts
    177
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by suprabhat View Post

    In some Rackets Specification (like wilson) have mentioned balance as 29cm, 29.5cm. How to read this data input and find out head heavy racket.
    umm is the exact same thing, except the measurement term is different
    basically 29, 29.5cm is equal to 290mm,295mm
    10mm = 1 cm

    simple conversion, hope this helps. GL

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Heavy head rackets or Light head Rackets ( Smashing )
    By Jason123 in forum Badminton Rackets / Equipment
    Replies: 11
    : 03-09-2012, 05:14 PM
  2. Head light or head heavy rackets likely to cause tennis elbow?
    By TRENTEND in forum Badminton Rackets / Equipment
    Replies: 19
    : 09-23-2008, 10:49 AM
  3. Head Heavy Rackets
    By No0b102 in forum Badminton Rackets / Equipment
    Replies: 14
    : 04-20-2008, 01:27 AM
  4. Head heavy, tapered shaft but flexible
    By jaymz in forum Racket Recommendation / Comparison
    Replies: 5
    : 01-13-2008, 08:46 AM
  5. Most flexible + Most head heavy = ???
    By Feng_MP-100 in forum Badminton Rackets / Equipment
    Replies: 14
    : 07-19-2004, 03:29 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •