User Tag List

Page 25 of 48 FirstFirst ... 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 ... LastLast
Results 409 to 425 of 808
  1. #409
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    KL
    Posts
    2,177
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ants View Post
    Good for you... mine snapped less than 2 matches.
    I'm not such a hard smasher still learning the basics.
    Normally the strings would last at least 1 month +.
    But it's not like the evil empire wasn't frank to us. Durability is 0 for bg6 sharp. Says so at the back of the plastic bag holding the string.

  2. #410
    Regular Member ants's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Malaysian Citizen of the World
    Posts
    13,157
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Im not a hard smasher also. Broke it during flat drives.

  3. #411
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    32
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Got my ns9.9k today and strung it NGB 98 at 26lbs. Played with it for about 1 hours...for the 1st match.. got alot of miss hit and couldn't smash well.. the thing getting better in 2nd match and the smashing is good. still need more time to get used of it as still having some miss hits during the game...

  4. #412
    Regular Member chilli's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    chilliwack, b.c., Can./Mas.
    Posts
    488
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Just finished stringing my new ns9900 with BG80 at 28/30 #s(1 string)...feels light and fast with the swings. Will be playing with it tonight. Have been using arc10 which feels more solid.

  5. #413
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
    Posts
    12
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I bought mine (3UG5) strung with Nanogy 98 (24lb) last weekend and had played with it for 2 games.

    Good control due to its light/balance weight. It is a keeper!

  6. #414
    Regular Member chilli's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    chilliwack, b.c., Can./Mas.
    Posts
    488
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Played with the ns9900 last night for 2.5 hours. Great for pickups on smashes but needed a lot of effort smashing. Great smashes, though, when focused. Still need more time to decide whether to keep it. At the moment, the arc10's still top on my list.

  7. #415
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    TW, SG, HK
    Posts
    7,313
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Woohoo
    Got nanospeed 9900 one hour ago haven't played with it yet though got it from cockburn centre

  8. #416
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    TW, SG, HK
    Posts
    7,313
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I played with my nanospeed 9.9k for two hours and can give short review
    In the first 15 minutes you get slot of mis hits however after this your unstoppable great control when you hit a shot for example I was playing singles and played a backhand crosscourt net shot I thought it was going miles out however landed on the line this wasn't a fluke as I did this many a time
    You get a great angle when you smash an you get aprox the same amour of power
    Drops are simple even if your drops are not very good at drops you have good control
    The best thing about this racquet is the amount of control you get I can't fault this racquet so far!
    I bought it for 134 at the cockburn centre it Is strung with BG65tis at 23lbs but I shall change next month to nanogy 95

  9. #417
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    TW, SG, HK
    Posts
    7,313
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I forgot to give you my grades

    Power: 9
    Control: 10
    Net play: 9.5
    Clears: 9
    Overall Smashes: 9
    Manouverability:9.5

    What I mean by overall smashed is taking into account angle + power + control

  10. #418
    Regular Member chilli's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    chilliwack, b.c., Can./Mas.
    Posts
    488
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Please don't string with NGY95, as it'll be spongy after a week or so. I restrung my arc10 after 2 weeks of NGY95 with BG80 and the great sound is still there even the tension has dropped....so much better.

  11. #419
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
    Posts
    12
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Need some comments from NS9900 users.

    Would changing to a hard feel string, say BG-65Ti helps to improve to hit the shuttle further ?

    I'm not a hard hitter, but when I use my Armortec 700 strung with BG-65Ti, I could hit further with same strength.

    Thanks in advance.

    Jack

  12. #420
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    4,658
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    1) BG65ti is not a hard string. It is for hard hitter because it is thicker and has Ti coating. In fact, it is soft and tension drop fast.
    2) AT700 is head heavy. By using a thicker and heavier string, it makes head even heavier.

  13. #421
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Richmond, BC
    Posts
    5,209
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by chilli View Post
    Please don't string with NGY95, as it'll be spongy after a week or so. I restrung my arc10 after 2 weeks of NGY95 with BG80 and the great sound is still there even the tension has dropped....so much better.
    Seems normal for most strings. Would no count out the NGB95 for the users who do like this string. NGB95 is has a soft feeling compared to BG-80 which is stiff.

  14. #422
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    KL
    Posts
    2,177
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    How about NGB98? I use to use BG66 sharp. Loved it. But pricey cuz it lasts around 2 weeks only.

  15. #423
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Cheras
    Posts
    632
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by silentheart View Post
    1) BG65ti is not a hard string. It is for hard hitter because it is thicker and has Ti coating. In fact, it is soft and tension drop fast.
    2) AT700 is head heavy. By using a thicker and heavier string, it makes head even heavier.

    Good point! Why dint I think of that before...

  16. #424
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    67
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    HI all

    Can you please enlighten me on the NS9900 vs Arc10 problem that I am having.

    I have been using the Arc10 for half a year now, and jut started using the NS9900 today.

    For some weird reason, most of my shots hits the frame and it feels as though as the racket is so light that I am swinging a chupa chup! Is it that I need to use it more as the Arc10 is even balanced or I just suck?

    PS: I have no problem using the Arc10 in def or attk whatsoever. But when using the NS9900....i feel like a noob!

  17. #425
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Cheras
    Posts
    632
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I tink you tend to be a more attacking player or too used to requiring more head heavy racket.

    I am not so sure if you can transition between these 2 racquets in games cause they are very different. Arc is more offensive although it's labelled balance. Dont get me wrong, 9900 is powerful too but it's just bit different than the 10.

    Needs time to get used to it. Give it some time.
    For me it;s also a like it or hate it racquet.

Page 25 of 48 FirstFirst ... 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 26
    : 12-29-2011, 10:54 PM
  2. FS: Yonex Nanospeed 9900, HEAD metallix 10000 tour, Yonex Nanospeed 800 (UK preferred)
    By htvc1 in forum Buy & Sell - Read the rules sticky before you post
    Replies: 5
    : 08-19-2010, 06:52 AM
  3. FS: Yonex Nanospeed 9900, HEAD metallix 10000 tour, Yonex Nanospeed 800 (UK pref)
    By htvc1 in forum Buy & Sell - Read the rules sticky before you post
    Replies: 6
    : 06-04-2010, 10:26 AM
  4. Need review of Yonex Nanospeed 9900 & Arc Saber 7
    By ::R:: in forum Racket Recommendation / Comparison
    Replies: 4
    : 05-28-2010, 09:46 PM
  5. My review: Yonex Nanospeed 9900 vs Yonex Armortec 900 Technique
    By LD rules! in forum Racket Recommendation / Comparison
    Replies: 40
    : 03-21-2010, 02:57 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •