User Tag List

Page 38 of 48 FirstFirst ... 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 LastLast
Results 630 to 646 of 808
  1. #630
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    TW, SG, HK
    Posts
    7,313
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    BCers

    Does anyone know if there I a 2nd Generation Nanospeed 9900 ? I was looking through the 2010-2011 book, and it claims that it has Ultra PEF in the shaft, then I looked in the 2009-2010 and there is no mention at all of Ultra PEF in the Nanospeed 9900, I checked the website, to see if this had been a print error but it appears that it hasn't.
    So is this a new 2nd gen ?

  2. #631
    Regular Member Blitzzards's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    GMT-04:00
    Posts
    1,437
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LD rules! View Post
    BCers

    Does anyone know if there I a 2nd Generation Nanospeed 9900 ? I was looking through the 2010-2011 book, and it claims that it has Ultra PEF in the shaft, then I looked in the 2009-2010 and there is no mention at all of Ultra PEF in the Nanospeed 9900, I checked the website, to see if this had been a print error but it appears that it hasn't.
    So is this a new 2nd gen ?
    The Ultra PEF "technology feature" is not listed under the NS9900 in the 2010 Japanese catalogue. I believe what you've seen is just a simple typo.

  3. #632
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    UK / HK
    Posts
    68
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Yonex have a tendency to do this in the catalogues, I know it occured in one of the ultimum ti racket specs. aswell few years ago.

  4. #633
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    TW, SG, HK
    Posts
    7,313
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Blitzzards View Post
    The Ultra PEF "technology feature" is not listed under the NS9900 in the 2010 Japanese catalogue. I believe what you've seen is just a simple typo.
    It's not just in the book it's on the Yonex UK website
    http://Www.yonex.co.uk/badminton/Pro...spx?ProdID=476
    1800 post
    Last edited by LD rules!; 04-14-2010 at 06:51 AM.

  5. #634
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    TW, SG, HK
    Posts
    7,313
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    so anyone know about wheter or not This is a different nanospeed 9900 or the same one, as they realeased in April 2009

  6. #635
    Regular Member demolidor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    @Hollanti
    Posts
    11,730
    Mentioned
    22 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    And only on the UK website . Ultra PEF wouldn't make much sense with the NS series anyway, and a 2nd gen with no change in paintwork? ...

  7. #636
    Regular Member demolidor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    @Hollanti
    Posts
    11,730
    Mentioned
    22 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    To add: catalogues can contain errors. I saw quite a large list for the JP one on the japanese Yonex website a short while ago, trying to find it now but unsuccesfully so far ... went way too far already, here it is: http://www.yonex.co.jp/news/2010/02/1002221400.html (more so for the tennis one I see)
    Last edited by demolidor; 04-14-2010 at 12:09 PM.

  8. #637
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    TW, SG, HK
    Posts
    7,313
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by demolidor View Post
    And only on the UK website . Ultra PEF wouldn't make much sense with the NS series anyway, and a 2nd gen with no change in paintwork? ...
    It's not just one place it says that it contains Ultra PEF it says it in two places on that page. And in the book anyway like you said it wouldn't make much sence, the nanospeed range are all about repulsion, so ultra PEF wouldn't work in this racket. And yes they haven't changed the paintwork

  9. #638
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    1,271
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    i think they were embellishing the Specifications a bit too much. don't worry about it. if you like the NS9900, play with it.

  10. #639
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    137
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I think if they released a new version of the top nanospeed, they would have had a big advertising campaign and some new paint

  11. #640
    New Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    1
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default NS 9900 price / Wuhan China @ Yonex store

    Hi guys, just still pricing indicator:
    In Wuhan (DC of Hubei province) @ Yonex store: 1990 RMB (1 equals 9,29 RMB for an indication).

    Cheers,

    A

  12. #641
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    NZ
    Posts
    75
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Did anyone try the NS9900 2U TW version? How was the paint/frame/feel compare to SP/AS/US? As I got one NS9.9k NZ code 3U/G4 and feel a little light for me but still powerful, so I would like to buy a 2U version hoping more power and can play single. Can someone rate the 2U and 3U in term of (feel, power, control, defence, maneuverability)? Thanks.
    Last edited by nz2010; 04-17-2010 at 08:48 AM.

  13. #642
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    puchong, malaysia
    Posts
    535
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    ns 9.9k 2u appear in any other code than tw and jp?

  14. #643
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    24
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    What string do u all prefer for ns9900?

  15. #644
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    NZ
    Posts
    75
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    According to yonex catalogue that someone posted on this forum it will be NBG95 and BG65Ti. If you want more power I think BG85 very good too but not as durable as 65 and 95. Problem with BG65Ti is the tension, you should string it at 1 or 2 more lbs in case tension drop.

  16. #645
    Regular Member Blitzzards's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    GMT-04:00
    Posts
    1,437
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I recently cut the strings off my NS9900 to prepare for a new restring and simultaneously removed the grip. Out of curiousity I measured the dry balance point without the string and grip.

    It turned out the be 305mm. Is this considered head heavy?

  17. #646
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    137
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    overgrip or replacement grip?

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 26
    : 12-29-2011, 10:54 PM
  2. FS: Yonex Nanospeed 9900, HEAD metallix 10000 tour, Yonex Nanospeed 800 (UK preferred)
    By htvc1 in forum Buy & Sell - Read the rules sticky before you post
    Replies: 5
    : 08-19-2010, 06:52 AM
  3. FS: Yonex Nanospeed 9900, HEAD metallix 10000 tour, Yonex Nanospeed 800 (UK pref)
    By htvc1 in forum Buy & Sell - Read the rules sticky before you post
    Replies: 6
    : 06-04-2010, 10:26 AM
  4. Need review of Yonex Nanospeed 9900 & Arc Saber 7
    By ::R:: in forum Racket Recommendation / Comparison
    Replies: 4
    : 05-28-2010, 09:46 PM
  5. My review: Yonex Nanospeed 9900 vs Yonex Armortec 900 Technique
    By LD rules! in forum Racket Recommendation / Comparison
    Replies: 40
    : 03-21-2010, 02:57 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •