User Tag List

Page 28 of 48 FirstFirst ... 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 ... LastLast
Results 460 to 476 of 808
  1. #460
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    6
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jk1980 View Post
    That's unlikely...AT900P is damn heavy racquet man.

    But the heaviness for me is also during the swing.
    The racquet itself perhaps not that much heavier, but due to the shape of the head, it doesn't slice the air as fast as ns9900.
    Playing with it yes it is way heavier but on the scale it wasn't, but we are talking a few grams here. AT900P is 94.9g and AS9900 is 97.1g, both with the exact overgrap wrap. Only differance is the 9900 is strung with BG70pro and the AT900P with BG65, but I weighed a 10m pack of both and they were the same.

  2. #461
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    KL
    Posts
    2,176
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gemcat View Post
    Actually, my NS8000 does the swivels too, just not as significant as NS9900. Probably just the angle of the swing force. I find the NS9900 allows you to concentrate your power more easily. Like if you hit the sweet spot exactly, the shuttle produces a very nice flight path, but if you don't, the shuttle will go off where you aim.

    Means ns9900 needs more precision to use well?

  3. #462
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    TW, SG, HK
    Posts
    7,313
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I have had a ton of mishits so far but no clash scared it may break

  4. #463
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    HK
    Posts
    33
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Hi all guys here. I ju st bought it last month. The first impression of using the racket is so amazing. It is so light, react so quick. After I played it for around 30mins, I think I addict to it. Before I buy it, I use cab 21, at700 and Ti-10. But after I use NS9900, I can't adapt to use all my head heavy rackets. Coz they can't compete with the NS9900 in the response and the weight. So I think I have loved it.

  5. #464
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    San Jose, CA
    Posts
    260
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    After about a week of playing with the NS9900, I realized that you need more aim/accuracy and precision to use it. The smashes go a lot faster if you hit the (smaller) sweet spot. It's hard to find though. My friend's sweet spot is normal. It's on the top but a bit smaller and his racket is a JP model. Mine was made in the US but for some reason, I feel the center isn't really.. centered. I haven't gotten any scratches on mine yet so I'm hopping for an exchange, to see how the next US one plays. Everyone I know has JP style NS9900s.

  6. #465
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    WA, Australia
    Posts
    17
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    The NS9900 is just a great racket. Moved to it from my initial NS8000 and NS9000X.. The feel's about the same though. Although its classed as an extra stiff, the stiffness is not that "extra".. Very great feel to it but u need to have a lot of precision to use it to its potential. Greater power produced due to the Head Light spec. =D..

    Overall, It's now my new baby cause its really fun to play with, for me, its not that much of a super attacking racket. It's pretty much evened out. Great racket swings for great defense and offense. Recommended. =D.

    NS9000X served me well with loads of scratches.. Time for it to relax a bit and be my backup. =D

  7. #466
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    TW, SG, HK
    Posts
    7,313
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    after a about three weeks of constant use I think that the racquet is not as powerful as first thought
    It could be that it needs restrung because it just is lacking In power I am going to see about it getting it restrung and if the problem persists I might have to think about changing racquets again

  8. #467
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    WA, Australia
    Posts
    17
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LD rules! View Post
    after a about three weeks of constant use I think that the racquet is not as powerful as first thought
    It could be that it needs restrung because it just is lacking In power I am going to see about it getting it restrung and if the problem persists I might have to think about changing racquets again
    Hmmz. Wat string and tension u on? I'm currently using BG 80 at Tension 29lbs. Working great for me. But the power is not that great if you dun get the shuttle on the sweet spot.. which is a turn down i suppose. And it puts a lot of strain on the wrist when attacking as well cause need a fast swing to increase racket head speed for greater smash. =.="

  9. #468
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    1,271
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LD rules! View Post
    after a about three weeks of constant use I think that the racquet is not as powerful as first thought
    It could be that it needs restrung because it just is lacking In power I am going to see about it getting it restrung and if the problem persists I might have to think about changing racquets again

    could it be too stiff?
    i wouldn't close the book on that racket yet.

  10. #469
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    San Jose, CA
    Posts
    260
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jymbalaya View Post
    could it be too stiff?
    i wouldn't close the book on that racket yet.
    Perhaps it's just too stiff for his liking/use.

  11. #470
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    KL
    Posts
    2,176
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I think due to it's light head, its well suited for wrist players. Added too much grip previously and the head became too light...balance point all gone. Tonnes of mishits.
    Now I just wrap with overgrip. Sweet...

  12. #471
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    WA, Australia
    Posts
    17
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jk1980 View Post
    I think due to it's light head, its well suited for wrist players. Added too much grip previously and the head became too light...balance point all gone. Tonnes of mishits.
    Now I just wrap with overgrip. Sweet...
    Yea. It works well with just an overgrip. I'm no longer having a lot of mis-hits in a game and its getting easier and easier to use and the % hits on the sweet point is getting higher and higher giving it a better performance. I have a feeling in the near future, this racket will have a higher demand rate than the 9000X and the AT900T. =D

  13. #472
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    TW, SG, HK
    Posts
    7,313
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    It isn't too stiff for me as I have used the ns9000 and that was fine + the at900t is stiff but I had no problems with it
    I will try using overgrop as it has no overgrip at the moment and is G3 in comparison to at900t which is G4

  14. #473
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    KL
    Posts
    2,176
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LD rules! View Post
    It isn't too stiff for me as I have used the ns9000 and that was fine + the at900t is stiff but I had no problems with it
    I will try using overgrop as it has no overgrip at the moment and is G3 in comparison to at900t which is G4
    What i meant was just overgrip. No refresh grip. So the grip becomes damn thin and the head slightly heavier.

  15. #474
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    11
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Just tested mine out today and enjoyed it. Excellent in doubles my returns were much easier as the racket was so easy to manouver. Drives were lacking a bit of power but the precision i was missing with MP99 was back. Had some mishits and my clears and smashes were sometimes not right. My smashes are always incosistent but when i found the sweet spot they flew nicely. Got to get used to the head light again from even balance but overall enjoyed it. Great for doubles but MP99 better for singles

  16. #475
    Regular Member chilli's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    chilliwack, b.c., Can./Mas.
    Posts
    488
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Just sold my ns9900...had it for just over a week...played about 10 hours with it...restrung twice as the BG80 string broke both times at the top....strung at 27/29#s both times...couldn't get any consistency with it....light and fast though. Going back to the arc10.

  17. #476
    New Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    2
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Hi everyone I just got NS9900 replace ARC10. Let me give you guys some idea about these top of the line racket. I had ARC10 about 6 months very good racket have everything that you are looking for. Last week, NS9900 arrived and I demo it....love it!
    The different is ARC10 give you consistance. If you are top player you will chose ARC10.
    I will say NS9900 is a game improvement racket. NS9900 will take you to next level. you will play fast, respond fast, smash fast....

Page 28 of 48 FirstFirst ... 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 26
    : 12-29-2011, 10:54 PM
  2. FS: Yonex Nanospeed 9900, HEAD metallix 10000 tour, Yonex Nanospeed 800 (UK preferred)
    By htvc1 in forum Buy & Sell - Read the rules sticky before you post
    Replies: 5
    : 08-19-2010, 06:52 AM
  3. FS: Yonex Nanospeed 9900, HEAD metallix 10000 tour, Yonex Nanospeed 800 (UK pref)
    By htvc1 in forum Buy & Sell - Read the rules sticky before you post
    Replies: 6
    : 06-04-2010, 10:26 AM
  4. Need review of Yonex Nanospeed 9900 & Arc Saber 7
    By ::R:: in forum Racket Recommendation / Comparison
    Replies: 4
    : 05-28-2010, 09:46 PM
  5. My review: Yonex Nanospeed 9900 vs Yonex Armortec 900 Technique
    By LD rules! in forum Racket Recommendation / Comparison
    Replies: 40
    : 03-21-2010, 02:57 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •