Me and my bro played a session of badminton agianst my two other friends. We were using AT 900's vs's there Ti-10's and man was it a fite to the death. After I wanted to see what the Ti-10's performence was so I used the 3U while my bro uses the 2U and man we beat them hands down. It was only smash smash smash. Is the Ti-10 more powerful then the AT 900P??? If so I need one in the bag with the Arc 10.
truth. i am sure some find the Nanospeed 9000X 2U to be extremely powerful as well. with rackets, ymmv, and also your power output. strings also make a difference as well.
Well I guess in my hands the only thing that went threw my mind was to keep smashing. It's totally took away my technique and I always craved for that smash. String and tension were the same on all 4 racquets. I should try it agian tonight.
I must get a Ti-10 or something equalivent. The racquet feels so good in my hand tonight. Even tho it's not as fast as my AT 900T or Arc 10 it has so much punch that won't stop till my arm says it's tired. Wat's the Titanium mesh suppose to do anyways?
^ feel different but playability almost equal. First gen more solid and third gen is more stiff. I have all gen and all strung with same string and tension
Sounds like the Ti-10 is more suitable for you than the AT900P. It really doesn't matter which racket is supposed to be more powerful. What matters is which you prefer to play with.
FOR ME PERSONALLY .. i find the Ti-10 a much faster/easier to maneuver racket (compare to my 4U at900t) in the game of fast attacking and push plays (in doubles) making it easier use .. in terms of power its not much difference .. but at900t is easier to control if its the "slower" type of game i guess its all a matter of preference as the others mentioned ..
