User Tag List
Results 341 to 357 of 441
-
04-25-2009, 05:36 AM #341
-
04-25-2009, 05:37 AM #342
-
04-25-2009, 05:38 AM #343
what about the other INA MD?? are they progress to final to face JPN MD?
-
04-25-2009, 05:41 AM #344
ur concept is simple,but,reach a few round further in a tournament doesnt mean a better than b. many things need to take in count,luck of draw is one of them. anyway,case closed as u didnt get what i mean.
badmania,u think she can be another saina?
-
04-25-2009, 05:50 AM #345
watching how she played, remind me Mia Audina when 14 y.o.
-
04-25-2009, 05:55 AM #346
-
04-25-2009, 05:59 AM #347
-
04-25-2009, 06:04 AM #348
btw,how md result?who is the winner ina or mas?
-
04-25-2009, 06:08 AM #349
-
04-25-2009, 06:12 AM #350
-
04-25-2009, 06:15 AM #351
wow, this 14 year old girl enter the final?

umm, congrats to her.
just woke up koz very tired after back from badminton
-
04-25-2009, 06:22 AM #352
Edo/Lingga bear the target of having to win this tourney. So, I am sure Edo will be very disappointed with the result.
I personally expect Edo/Lingga to finish as runners-up behind Hendri/Hendra when the draw was made. That's why I commented in the earlier post before the tournament began that it will be hard for INA to win a title in MD. Hendri/Hendra's loss yesterday raised my expectation but to no avail
Japanese double pairs are certainly starting to rise up to the occassion with the emergence of young pairs like:
1. Kenta Kazuno/Kenichi Hayakawa -- I am sure nobody heard of this pair before this year, but they are now World No 16
2. Naoki Kawamae/Shoji Sato -- Sato has been remarkable in MD so far, winning 3 tourneys earlier this year and now WR40.
3. Yoshiteru Hirobe/Hajime Komiyama -- WR59 and Winner of the Osaka Int Challenge 2009, beating Kazuno/Hayakawa in the SF.
4. Hirokatsu Hashimoto/Noriyasu Hirata -- WR72 and Runner-Up of the Osaka Int Challenge 2009.
...and now perhaps a no 5 with this new pairing of Takeshi Kamura/Takuma Euda?
Wifqi/Afiat also lost 19-21 in the rubber-set to Hong Chieng Hun/Chow Pak Chuu
Well, no INA-Final for MD as well, in fact, both are eliminated much to the disappointment of INA fans
However, Wifqi/Afiat have exceeded my expectation of QF placement by surprisingly beating Hendri/Hendra yesterday.Last edited by badMania; 04-25-2009 at 06:28 AM.
-
04-25-2009, 06:26 AM #353
Analysis on both INA MD's losses today by the team manager:
They lost not because of the burden of being the top 2 seeds. It's more due to the lack of judgement in terms of change of tactics (kurang perubahan taktik) in the middle of the game. Actually, the opponents were not that special after all (lawan dua2nya tidak istimewa sama sekali). (*before anyone shot me with "biased" words yet again, note that these were the words of the team manager, not me
).
-
04-25-2009, 06:31 AM #354
So, no change from the status just now, 1 title in XD and 3 more Finals. No representatives in MD

1 more title will be welcomed...perhaps from WS or WD?
-
04-25-2009, 06:37 AM #355
-
04-25-2009, 06:44 AM #356
With the NSS, MD is the most competitive discipline at this moment. I'm not surprised with the losses of INA as any pair can win over any pair at anytime.
Disappointment from the top 2 seeds are undrestandable as MD is INA's most confident event in this tourney. From my observations in the previous tourneys, Edo/Lingga are not stable yet. I'm not sure about Wifqi/Afiat.
-
04-25-2009, 07:25 AM #357
anyone know who's the other WD finalist??
Similar Threads
-
CIputra Vietnam International Challenge 2012 (26 Mar to 1 April 2012)
By okiazr in forum 2012 TournamentsReplies: 2: 03-09-2012, 11:34 AM -
Ciputra Hanoi Vietnam Challenge 2011
By hungle in forum 2011 TournamentsReplies: 84: 04-09-2011, 04:41 PM -
2010 Ciputra Hanoi Vietnam Challenge (Hanoi, 20-25 April 2010)
By CLELY in forum 2010 TournamentsReplies: 103: 04-30-2010, 02:57 AM -
Ciputra Hanoi Vietnam Challenge 2009 - Pictures
By anfan2000 in forum 2009 TournamentsReplies: 2: 04-24-2009, 01:19 AM -
Vietnam International Challenge
By gemini12 in forum 2008 TournamentsReplies: 445: 07-14-2008, 10:57 AM





?
Reply With Quote


Bookmarks