User Tag List
Results 2,636 to 2,652 of 6503
-
09-27-2010, 11:14 PM #2636
-
09-27-2010, 11:16 PM #2637
-
09-27-2010, 11:19 PM #2638
-
09-28-2010, 01:13 AM #2639
-
09-28-2010, 01:28 AM #2640
Haha from the response so far, it seems like you'll have plenty of sales.
I am curious though what the T2 would be like in both a stiffer and less stiff version.
-
09-28-2010, 02:07 AM #2641
Sorry DinkAlot Sir, for raising the question.
Could you please give some information regarding comparison between "Trinity 2 Pro" and "Genesis".
-
09-28-2010, 02:29 AM #2642
-
09-28-2010, 02:59 AM #2643
Update on all the Panda Power rackets:
Precision: available in about a week
Trinity 2v3: currently available
UltraPro: in production, available in 30-45 days
Titan: revised, based on the Arc Saber 10 frame, still in the testing phase
"Racket D" (no name yet): new dynamic power shaft, undecided frame shape, either Arc Saber or AT900P), early testing phase
Revelation: delayed indefinitely; until Panda can find the proper shaft
Genesis: no longer being produced
-
09-28-2010, 03:05 AM #2644
-
09-28-2010, 03:12 AM #2645
-
09-28-2010, 03:16 AM #2646
-
09-28-2010, 03:16 AM #2647
-
09-28-2010, 03:30 AM #2648
-
09-28-2010, 04:00 AM #2649
-
09-28-2010, 06:31 AM #2650
How does Precision compared woth Trinity2v3 and ultra pro? Would Precision stand out among the rest?
-
09-28-2010, 08:10 AM #2651
-
09-28-2010, 08:34 AM #2652
Precision is designed as a generally more defensive/counter-attacking racket. The Trinity 2 has a stiffer shaft, and will probably allow you to generate a little more power weight-for-weight (although a heavy Precision may still hit harder than a light Trinity 2), but the Precision will let you generate power with less effort / shorter swing (eg. net kills) / worse technique, and should handle a little better due to the improved aerodynamics of the new frame.
The Ultra Pro will be significantly more hard-hitting than either, provided you have the technique and strength to handle it, but it will be far less suited to defensive or finesse players because of the extra weight. Power will probably be comparable to the Ultra 1, but the lighter weight and more head-heavy balance should make it easier to use, depending on what shaft stiffness Dinkalot chooses - if he goes with a flex rating of 6.5-7.0, then I'd expect it to be just as demanding as the Ultra 1 (ie. suitable for experienced players only), but potentially even more powerful.
I made a chart to illustrate roughly how the different Panda Power rackets compare:
* The Ultra Pro will either be 6.5-7.0 or 7.0-7.5, but not both - Dinkalot hasn't decided which.
Very broadly speaking:
Higher Flex = lets you generate power with less effort / shorter swing (eg. net kills) / worse technique - but absolute maximum power is less.
Higher Moment = slower on defense but potentially more powerful.
Obviously there are other factors to consider as well, such as aerodynamics...
As always, your mileage may vary..
Similar Threads
-
List your playing style, main racket, string & string tension
By neoanderson777 in forum Badminton StringReplies: 684: 05-12-2013, 11:29 PM -
Panda Power Ultra 2 Racket!
By Hakular in forum Racket Recommendation / ComparisonReplies: 9: 02-04-2011, 10:46 PM -
String Recommendation for Panda Power Precision
By kevindd992002 in forum Badminton Rackets / EquipmentReplies: 1: 10-02-2010, 02:50 PM -
WTB/FT: Panda Power racket or sotx racket/s. Scarborough Area plz (gta)
By Kirbit316 in forum Buy & SellReplies: 1: 06-05-2010, 10:05 PM -
40lbs string tension
By Daniel Chen in forum Badminton StringReplies: 8: 06-27-2001, 07:49 PM







Reply With Quote






Bookmarks