Results 2,993 to 3,009 of 6648
10-18-2010, 01:56 PM #2993
It look nice, but official Panda logo for the rackets should be as presented:
More representative, and should bring more questions toward the brand.
I really love that image, once perfected, can the stencil be available???
10-18-2010, 05:48 PM #2994
10-18-2010, 05:49 PM #2995
10-18-2010, 05:50 PM #2996
10-18-2010, 05:59 PM #2997
10-20-2010, 04:44 PM #2998
Rimmed a shot on my T2 tonight and the frame snapped. Gutted.
10-20-2010, 04:50 PM #2999
Not lucky, because so far I feel like the T2 is quite solid. My partner clashed it pretty hard, when we both went for a smash in the middle, and I was surprised, to see that it almost not even affected the paint, only a minor chip. I have some Apacs rackets that just by hitting on the frame will make a paint chip.
10-20-2010, 04:53 PM #3000
10-20-2010, 05:02 PM #3001
10-20-2010, 08:24 PM #3002
The paint and construction of the Trinity rackets is quite solid, some of the best actually. The only one that I find is actually stronger and better construction and durability is the old Zelm PP9990. But the performance doesn't compare to be honest. I'd rather have the T2 because it is much more balanced.
10-20-2010, 09:32 PM #3003
And also the usual place as my other rackets, near the border of the cone and the shaft. I guess it is the weakest point and the place where the shaft is gripped when flexing.
10-20-2010, 10:05 PM #3004
Ya I notice the U2 paint isn't as durable, I have many little chips along the frame from mishits. Also If you use a grip tape and it touches the graphics on the cone it may even rip the dc badminton logo right off. U1 paint job is much better then the U2 imo.
10-21-2010, 01:25 AM #3005
10-21-2010, 01:46 AM #3006
Some U2s had extremely durable finishes, some not so great. The T2 was more consistent than the U2 but still some inconsistent ones.
Going forward, including the Precision, Panda has tried very hard focusing on improving the paint and finish quality.
Panda thinks you'll see the improvements in the Precision and new rackets to come.
10-21-2010, 01:49 AM #3007
Update: Panda has received quite a few "excellent" and "really, really like" reviews of the Precision via e-mail. Hope these P-Users will post soon.
P.S. The the most important thing so far, not one dissatisfied user...yet.
10-21-2010, 01:57 AM #3008
10-21-2010, 02:09 AM #3009
LOL! Panda counters with some reviews of the Precision mostly via e-mail and some verbal:
"Just to let you know, I really really like it and I'm looking to buy two more."
"I wanted to thank you for such a great product. After having the pleasure of using it for a couple of weeks now, I have no complaints whatsoever, and it has literally improved my game in every aspect. I'm a firm believer in giving credit where it is due, and this is definitely one of those cases."
"Wow, this thing is really solid. I'm surprised."
"Love the racket but the string is too tight for me."
"My Precision is crazy fast."
"Clears are effortless, impressive."
"The racket is amazing. I will buy another one."
"The Precision is good but string tension makes a difference. At first I strung it with BG65 at 25lbs. and it was too low, the racket didn't feel quite right so I cut the string and restrung it at 28lbs. and it's a completely different racket. Now it's very good."
"Good job once again Sir."
"Panda strikes again!"
"The racket is gorgeous, your best design yet."
"Ooooh, this is good."
By neoanderson777 in forum Badminton StringReplies: 706: 12-18-2013, 04:21 AM
By Hakular in forum Racket Recommendation / ComparisonReplies: 9: 02-04-2011, 11:46 PM
By kevindd992002 in forum Badminton Rackets / EquipmentReplies: 1: 10-02-2010, 03:50 PM
By Kirbit316 in forum Buy & Sell - Read the rules sticky before you postReplies: 1: 06-05-2010, 11:05 PM
By Daniel Chen in forum Badminton StringReplies: 8: 06-27-2001, 08:49 PM