Results 290 to 306 of 6648
07-20-2009, 08:00 PM #290
07-20-2009, 08:02 PM #291
07-20-2009, 08:48 PM #292
07-20-2009, 10:29 PM #293
07-21-2009, 02:54 AM #294
I went to play today and I was using the Trinity and having a really hard time adjusting to it from my Chao Pai Nano 728. Those rackets were 287 bp and 87 and 88 grams. The Trinity I was using was 290 bp 87.1 and 87.2 and I just couldnt generate power. My accuracy was fair, but the power was so weak. Clears were going 3/4 and I was getting KILLED! I ended up getting into a singles match and saw the opponent wasn't very powerful so I though this would be a good chance to try the Ultra again. I went for it and It was GREAT! Warming up over hand clears were wonderful, smashers were explosive! WTHECK is going on! i was thinking. I played the rest of the evening with the Ultra. I have no clue what is happening but for whatever reason I hit much better with the Ultra than the Trinity despite my previous racket being more mild than the Trinity. And so...Your mileage may vary.
07-21-2009, 03:06 AM #295
07-21-2009, 03:35 AM #296
07-21-2009, 07:42 AM #297
for the 40 lbs i think just like a ply wood that we cut and put it to be fitted to the frame and then go out for the game......hahaha
07-21-2009, 02:24 PM #298
An unbiased & uncensored review will be due shortly..
..after quickly reading all 18 pages of this thread, i can't wait to finally get my hands & fingers and try out master DinkAlot's newest inventions, later tonight...woohooo!!
stay tuned for more unbiased & uncensored review of the 2 rackets later tonite..
07-21-2009, 03:14 PM #299
07-21-2009, 03:47 PM #300
..as a matter of fact, i might camp out @ SGVBC as early as 5:30..
07-21-2009, 03:52 PM #301
07-21-2009, 04:06 PM #302
..and i've been waiting (and waiting and waiting) to make time & try them out ever since master DinkAlot announced their release..
07-21-2009, 06:24 PM #303
Chris, I do not understand how you have been "waiting (and waiting and waiting)".
1) The rackets were only available about a week ago.
2) You have multiple ways to get a hold of Panda: e-mail, IM, phone call, friends, meet at a designated time stated here. Panda had no idea you were so eager to try out the rackets. Panda's honored.
3) Also, would it not be hard to review the rackets in any detail after one night play testing?
07-22-2009, 12:59 AM #304
Quick hitz review..
The waiting was almost unbearable. The hours passed and it felt like weeks. The days passed and it felt like months...
- Yes, i noticed they just came out the last week or so..
- Yes, i was able to get a hold of your first line of security line. Yes, i was eager to check them out.
- Yes, you're partly right.
Anyway, here is my quick hitz review of Panda Power's 2 newest rackets; the Ultra & the Trinity. And before i start, just want to say thanks to both Dan & Tommy for allowing me to test the rackets.
So, i came early today, as promised and waited sort of anxiously. Not too long of a wait, master Dan came walking in with his trusty companion, master Tommy. Soon, i was wielding & swatting the shuttles with both rackets.
I did 2 tests. Both rackets were strung with relatively the same tension, 25-26 lbs. I'll share my initial testing first:
First up in my tryout was the Ultra. First thing i noticed when i held the racket was its weight. IIRC, the racket version i was wielding was the 87-88g version. The shaft felt relatively stiff. I swung the racket and whacked the bird with relative ease as it packed a good & solid punch, whilst doing some clears, drives, pushes and smashes. The smashes felt good, oh yeah, felt real good. Backhand clears, backhand pushes, backhand drives were also pretty solid. Now comes the maneuvarability test. Surprisingly, i was able to wield it with relative ease. It felt a bit heavy, but i didn't feel much difficulty in trying to defend smashes or drives.
Overall, the Ultra has a solid feel. Heavy but still wieldable, at least on my hands.
Now, after chatting with Dan and Tommy, i found out that the Ultra does come with a few other variations (mostly with BP and weight). Personally, a slightly lighter version, say an 86-87g, would be fine with me.
Next up is the Trinity. Just like what everyone has mentioned before, yes, the Trinity is indeed much more wield friendly, lighter than the Ultra. The shaft felt a bit more flexible than the Ultra. Now comes the test. Unknown to me, the version that i was wielding, IIRC around 85-86g, felt a bit on the head-light side. I tried to do the same clears, drives, pushes and smashes, backhand strokes and felt it wasn't as solid or didn't have the same feeling as the Ultra. On my swings, it seems the racket was heavier. Even the other person who was testing the racket w/me felt the same. I don't know, maybe of the weight of the racket or the BP or the flex of the shaft was the cause. Maneuvarability wise, it felt okay, not much different with the Ultra.
Here is my 2nd testing:
After i did my initial testing & unsatisfied with the Trinity, i tested another version of the Trinity. This time i was given a slightly heavier version; and IIRC, i tried the 87-88g version. Wow, what a difference a few extra grams make. I was quite satisfied with the solid feel and punch the heavier Trinity version was providing. It almost felt like the Ultra, which i tried earlier.
Pretty much the same w/what others had already mentioned. In the 2 testings, i can conclude that the Ultra and Trinity are pretty good and pretty solid rackets. Finish-wise, i definitely prefer the Ultra's color scheme & finish. Weight wise, i think the max i can go with is 88g, and that's for both attacking & defending. Anything higher than that, then i'd probably won't be able to wield it with ease.
Too bad i was only able to do a semi-stationary testing as I wasn't able to play a game with either racket to see how they respond. I would guess, over the course of a game, the heavier version Ultra or the heavier version Trinity would be a bit more demanding. But if one can handle it, then i'd say go for it.
One last note, there will be another model coming out soon, the Woven model. Supposedly, it should fall in between the Ultra & the Trinity. Tommy mentioned, maybe i should test that one later and maybe it'll suit me better.
Last edited by ctjcad; 07-22-2009 at 01:11 AM.
07-22-2009, 01:18 AM #305
..yes, as guaranteed by Tommy, the rackets didn't disappoint me.
I'd love to try & use either or both rackets in a real game to see how they fare..
07-24-2009, 12:05 PM #306
I also got a chance to play some singles with it and use my attacking clear a bunch (For me, driving the birdie from my backcourt to my opponent backcourt about 10 feet off the ground with a lot of velocity is one of the most demanding shots and a place where I see the difference in power between racquets) and the power was almost up to my VH1800 (remember that my Trinity is 85.5g and 283mm BP which makes it way lighter and faster than my VH1800 which was more like 88g and 290mm BP).
For such a light racquet, the power was a little bit shocking. I'm going to up my rating to:
Balance Point: 283mm
String: Ashaway ZM67
Grip: Karakal PU Super (black)
By neoanderson777 in forum Badminton StringReplies: 706: 12-18-2013, 04:21 AM
By Hakular in forum Racket Recommendation / ComparisonReplies: 9: 02-04-2011, 11:46 PM
By kevindd992002 in forum Badminton Rackets / EquipmentReplies: 1: 10-02-2010, 03:50 PM
By Kirbit316 in forum Buy & Sell - Read the rules sticky before you postReplies: 1: 06-05-2010, 11:05 PM
By Daniel Chen in forum Badminton StringReplies: 8: 06-27-2001, 08:49 PM