Results 3,775 to 3,791 of 6908
01-01-2011, 01:39 PM #3775
01-01-2011, 02:31 PM #3776
The image Dink posted is for the manufacturer's use - the colors are made to be easily distinguishable, but not necessarily accurate (we provide them with the precise Pantone color references separately).
Text is the same size as on the T2, with the exception of "panda power", which is somewhat smaller. It will also use the same kinds of paint finish as the T2.
Another preview image:
Full-size version here: http://usera.imagecave.com/adamhawke...ityProGold.png
01-01-2011, 02:34 PM #3777
Think it is fine but [you know it was coming] Trinity should have trinity spelled inside it
using a finer black line to make it more in keeping with the black frame. Other than that put me down for 2 84-85g's bp 285.
01-01-2011, 02:52 PM #3778
I don't personally think that would look good, but obviously you're welcome to your opinion.
More to the point, the factory would either refuse to even attempt that kind of fine detail, or they'd try it and completely balls it up (by which I mean, fail to achieve a level of precision that would satisfy Dink).
01-01-2011, 03:06 PM #3779
01-01-2011, 03:24 PM #3780
Awwwww yeaaaaa thats an awesome color. Oh man oh man.........
I might have to take one equivalent to a T2v2 in 86.1/287 for my collection... I will think about it. What's the ETA?
01-01-2011, 03:27 PM #3781
01-01-2011, 03:53 PM #3782
I see. Well I wanted to see if there would be a delay due to the change in color scheme, even though it isn't a major design change
01-01-2011, 04:58 PM #3783
Well the rackets have to be manufactured first before the design is applied, so the production was probably not delayed. Design looks awesome by the way - can't wait to get mine
01-01-2011, 05:05 PM #3784
Your right, you posted the better picture while I was slowly typing away. Now that I zoom in and see the white/gold in the print it looks great. In the other picture it just looked all the same color so didn't inspire me. Is there a technical name for that shade of gold or is a trade secret ?
01-01-2011, 05:33 PM #3785
I have a question about panda power bp
for panda power racket, which bp do they consider head light, even balance, and head heavy? (for example 290+ is heady heavy?)
01-01-2011, 05:37 PM #3786
01-01-2011, 05:39 PM #3787
01-01-2011, 05:48 PM #3788
Good on Panda for his years of R&D on his rackets!
01-01-2011, 06:02 PM #3789
01-01-2011, 06:30 PM #3790
@Visor: It doesn't have a name (that I'm aware of) - just a boring number. I'd call it amber, but then that's not very specific.
@Dinkalot: I'd have shifted those categories down one. 285~290mm is average; 300~305mm is not uncommon; <280mm is much rarer (mostly cheap and really heavy 1U/2U rackets).
01-01-2011, 06:38 PM #3791
BP275 or less = Very Head Light
BP276-280 = Head Light
BP281-285 = Moderately Head Light
BP286-290 = Balanced
BP291-295 = Moderately Head Heavy
BP296-300 = Head Heavy
BP301 or more = Very Head Heavy
I'll try to dig out a NS7000 tomorrow and measure ... (never used to bother with measurements even )
Last edited by demolidor; 01-01-2011 at 06:45 PM.
By neoanderson777 in forum Badminton StringReplies: 708: 12-26-2013, 10:12 AM
By Hakular in forum Racket Recommendation / ComparisonReplies: 9: 02-04-2011, 10:46 PM
By kevindd992002 in forum Badminton Rackets / EquipmentReplies: 1: 10-02-2010, 02:50 PM
By Kirbit316 in forum Buy & Sell - Read the rules sticky before you postReplies: 1: 06-05-2010, 10:05 PM
By Daniel Chen in forum Badminton StringReplies: 8: 06-27-2001, 07:49 PM