User Tag List
Results 1,191 to 1,207 of 6503
-
01-03-2010, 05:18 PM #1191
This is personal preference.
In general, assuming a normal weight racket (84-87g), BP between 280-290 is ideal for most people. If no clue, I'd recommend:
(Again, assuming racket weight: 84-87g)
For beginners/intermediate all-around players: BP280-285
For big hitters/offensive players: BP290-295
For advanced all-around players: BP285-290
It's best to start at BP285.
Also, depends what you play, if singles or doubles attacking, lean towards a bit more head heavy. If doubles/mixed, or need a fast transitioning racket, go for 285 or less to start.
-
01-03-2010, 07:12 PM #1192
Maybe because my SW35 is more head heavy than U1. My U1 is a lighter version hence the difference. How did you find the power between the U1 and SW35
-
01-03-2010, 07:47 PM #1193
After i try to bend the shaft, the U1 is indeed stiffer than SW35. Previously i was stating how i feel when i was playing with it. But in actual fact the U1 is stiffer. Could the difference in feeling be caused by the balance point and weight difference?
-
01-03-2010, 08:40 PM #1194
-
01-03-2010, 08:44 PM #1195
That is so true. I am looking forward to the website.
-
01-03-2010, 08:45 PM #1196
-
01-03-2010, 09:39 PM #1197
-
01-03-2010, 09:42 PM #1198
Bending the shaft can be misleading, only a general indicator when you are not able to test the racket. You need to test the rackets by actually playing with them.
The weight and BP can be a factor but what you posted in the previous post, the factors are working in reverse: head heavy causes the racket to be perceived more flexible while lighter rackets are perceived to be stiffer.
-
01-03-2010, 09:46 PM #1199
-
01-04-2010, 07:35 PM #1200
Panda Power Trinirt II
Swing Weight : 85.1g
BP : 288mm
String : ZyMax 67 White
Tension : 23x24 lb ECP no pre-stretch
Stringer & Machine : Me & Gamma 8800ELS
This racqet was the improved version of Trinity I. I liked the Trinity I very much and this is even better. I've been using T1 for a while and is about getting used to it. So it takes almost zero time for me to get use to T2.
How does it feel? It's solid, quick, and easy to use.
Panda Power Ultra II
Swing / Weight : Unknown ( Sample )
BP : Unknown ( Sample )
String : ZyMax 67 White
Tension : 23x24 lb ECP no pre-stretch
Stringer & Machine : Me & Gamma 8800ELS
This is amazing. I've tried this racquet with the same string at 25x26 lb(never intended for myself). And I got another chance to try it.
All I have to say is, I LOVE this racquet. I can feel the solid feel of my power transfering through it. I can feel my smash is soild and my power is tranffered at high effeciency.
This is better than ANY Yonex racquet I've tried/used. if you're hard hitter, attacking player, like high-tension, this is the racquet to give it a try.
-
01-04-2010, 07:50 PM #1201
Panda was asking me what Yonex racquet I tried.
Here is the long-waiting list I shall type out long time ago, and is not too detail.
Cab series - Like them a lot, but when you have AT 800/900, why bother?
Ti-Swing Power SA/SX/??/?? Liked it very much. Never owned one, all friends'
Ti-10 - Never had enough time to play with it, liked it much.
MP70 - like it very much, too bad it's a Japanese only model.
MP99 - Good, it's becoming MP classic racquet
MP100 - Good but frigile, broke too many.
AT700 - dislike this racquet, I can't find the touch of this racquet
AT800OFF - similar to DFF but harder to use
AT800DFF - I like this one for AT800 series, execellent power.
AT900P - Best ever Yonex racquet for the past 5 or more years, execellent frame design.
AT900T - slightly different than the 900P, not recommended. when you have 900P why 900T
NS9000S - If you like stiff, this is the one to go. I've strung so many of those.
NS9000X - I don't think this is a good racquet for girls, it's REALLY that STIFF
NS9900 - Replacement for whoever uses NS9000/AT900.
ARC-7 - Too light, quick thou
ARC-10 - Low requirement, easy to use, very forgiving.
ARC-9 - pretty solid for a racquet marketing for females.
ARC-Z - not worth the price tag, too light, no power(or to say, hard to generate power)Last edited by Takamsda; 01-04-2010 at 07:51 PM. Reason: add a space to the line
-
01-04-2010, 09:14 PM #1202
I was wondering which BP and weight I should look for or which racquet to buy for me and my brother. U2, U1, trinity 1 or 2
I currently play a AT900T 4U and sometimes apacs Nano PRO 9600 Tour. My brother plays AT900P. We both prefer to smash but he kinda likes to do net plays and drops compare to me where I like to hit as hard as possible.
-
01-04-2010, 09:21 PM #1203
-
01-04-2010, 10:55 PM #1204
Just got the T2 in the mail today. Just comparing it with the T1, the paintwork on the T2 is amazing and on par with high-end yonex rackets. I'll get a chance to try it out tomorrow!
-
01-04-2010, 11:02 PM #1205
-
01-04-2010, 11:04 PM #1206
-
01-04-2010, 11:35 PM #1207
I just hope the strings on mine doesnt snap within the first session like it did with the T1 =S.
Just swinging it around, it certainly feels/sounds like it cuts through the air faster than the T1.
Similar Threads
-
List your playing style, main racket, string & string tension
By neoanderson777 in forum Badminton StringReplies: 684: 05-12-2013, 11:29 PM -
Panda Power Ultra 2 Racket!
By Hakular in forum Racket Recommendation / ComparisonReplies: 9: 02-04-2011, 10:46 PM -
String Recommendation for Panda Power Precision
By kevindd992002 in forum Badminton Rackets / EquipmentReplies: 1: 10-02-2010, 02:50 PM -
WTB/FT: Panda Power racket or sotx racket/s. Scarborough Area plz (gta)
By Kirbit316 in forum Buy & SellReplies: 1: 06-05-2010, 10:05 PM -
40lbs string tension
By Daniel Chen in forum Badminton StringReplies: 8: 06-27-2001, 07:49 PM





Reply With Quote
96hrs to go!

Bookmarks