User Tag List

Page 73 of 453 FirstFirst ... 23 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 123 173 ... LastLast
Results 1,225 to 1,241 of 7685
  1. #1225
    Regular Member RSX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    136
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by what07 View Post
    Ur not the only canadian that doesn't have the racquets. Ur waiting for Trinity 2 from MJstrings?
    T2 Racquets have finally arrived in Canada ... those that pre-ordered will be hearing from me shortly. If anyone else in Canada is looking for the T2 or Ultra 1/2, pls email me at mjstrings@yahoo.com. Free Canada Wide shipping. Tks.

  2. #1226
    Regular Member Takamsda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Burnaby
    Posts
    166
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Panda Power racquets have arrived Vancouver BC since Dec 31st 2009.

    There are 5 T2 and 2 U2 left. Get it before it's gone.

    e-mail : takamsda@gmail.com

  3. #1227
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    TOR
    Posts
    9
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Short T2 Review

    Here goes my first review ever...

    I had the privilege to demo and purchase a T2 from Takamsda a couple days ago, and played with it for ~8 hrs now. Initially demo'ed the T2 with swing weight 88g (?), BP 288mm, with Zymax 67 at 23/24. The strings were too tight for me and I had little power, however the racket felt REALLY good so I bought one.


    My racket history: Ti 7 gen 1 (3 years), AT 800 OFF (2 years), NS 9000 S (2 years)
    Rackets usually strung with BG 80 or 85 at 22-24...not a high tension user

    Purchased T2 Specs: swing weight 84.9g, BP 286mm, Zymax 67 at 20/21, with string and added overgrip the BP is about 285mm now (kept the stock grip on)

    Physical appearance:
    The racket colours are beautiful!
    Quality wise, it is close to Yonex, not on par. On my racket there is a spot where a piece of dirt was painted on and fell off, leaving a very small "paint chip". Additionally, some paint is missing around a few of my grommets. I never had these problems with my Yonex rackets, so this is just my honest opinion (being the nick-picky person I am).

    ** For the points below, I will compare the T2 with my NS 9000 S as that was my most recent racket **

    Swing:
    The T2 definitely swings faster and lighter. At first, I had a little problem adjusting the timings for my drives and net kills (or anything that requires short wrist movements). It might just be the Zymax strings, but I think the T2 gives me a bit more repulsion power in clears and defensive lifts.

    Offence:
    It gave me just as much power, if not more, for smashing even with the relatively lower BP. I grip the bottom of handle when smashing, and just like krisyay mentioned, it feels real good! (don't know why, maybe less vibration?) For reference, my NS BP is 287mm and AT is 292mm.

    Defence:
    The T2 is easier to defend with due to it being lighter. Still getting used to doing better low/drive returns. It feels easier to lift to back court.

    Stiffness:
    The T2 is a bit stiffer then my type-S and less than the type-X. It is also noticeably less stiff than the T1 which I tried for a bit.

    Overall:
    Lots of power for a light racket. It gives me a bit more confidence in my defensive shots because of the better agility (might be just in my head ). My feeling is that the T2 has more control/accuracy.

    IMHO, I would describe it as feeling like a NS 9000 S and playing better than one. I really like it, and it's currently my "go-to" racket. If I had the $$ I would get another one asap

    Afterthoughts:
    Now that I think about it, maybe I should have tried a T2 with BP 290mm, don't think the extra 4mm would make much of a difference though.
    Can't believe my NS is now a backup...


    Hope this helps anyone in their decision making. I would definitely recommend the T2 for anyone looking for an even balanced racket. And certainly try it if you can!

    Well, I'm off to hit some more ...I'll add anything else that I can think of later.

  4. #1228
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    399
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    sir dink,the T2 is recommended for doubles....will you make a racq that is for singles and all around playing style???

  5. #1229
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    458
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sportech View Post
    sir dink,the T2 is recommended for doubles....will you make a racq that is for singles and all around playing style???
    I believe Sir dink tell you it is called ultra 2.

  6. #1230
    Regular Member visor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    10,258
    Mentioned
    139 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TimBitz View Post
    Here goes my first review ever...

    I had the privilege to demo and purchase a T2 from Takamsda a couple days ago, and played with it for ~8 hrs now. Initially demo'ed the T2 with swing weight 88g (?), BP 288mm, with Zymax 67 at 23/24. The strings were too tight for me and I had little power, however the racket felt REALLY good so I bought one.
    Can't wait to try mine out tomorrow night!

    Just out of curiosity, did you manage to try out his demo U2? If so, what did you think of it compared to T2 and your previous rackets?

  7. #1231
    Regular Member DinkAlot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    dcbadminton.net
    Posts
    12,280
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sportech View Post
    sir dink,the T2 is recommended for doubles....will you make a racq that is for singles and all around playing style???
    You can use the T2 for singles, no problem. It's optimized for doubles but it's just fine for singles.

    This Panda has been playing an occasional 2 on 1 (Panda being the one) and the T2 works just fine.

    The T2 is now Panda's go to racket.

  8. #1232
    Regular Member DinkAlot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    dcbadminton.net
    Posts
    12,280
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    TimBitz: WOW!!! For a "first" review, you hit a bullseye. All the attributes you stated were what we set out to do when creating the T2.

    Panda feels he can retire from doing the racket reviews and you can take over.

    Quote Originally Posted by TimBitz View Post
    Here goes my first review ever...
    No way, this Panda doesn't believe it.

    Quote Originally Posted by TimBitz View Post
    ** For the points below, I will compare the T2 with my NS 9000 S as that was my most recent racket **
    Excellent disclosure. Currently, the most used Yonex racket by pros and advanced players is the NS9000-S. It makes sense, it's a great racket. So Panda aimed to try and make something comparable...T2.

    Quote Originally Posted by TimBitz View Post
    The T2 definitely swings faster and lighter.
    Though the T1 was fast, Panda wanted something faster...T2.

    Quote Originally Posted by TimBitz View Post
    Offence:
    It gave me just as much power, if not more, for smashing even with the relatively lower BP.
    In general, the T1 was a bit too stiff to get that instant "snap" power. So Panda tried to make the next generation more snap friendly. So, the goal, more power, faster swing, lighter weight...T2.

    Quote Originally Posted by TimBitz View Post
    Defence:
    The T2 is easier to defend with due to it being lighter...It feels easier to lift to back court.
    Yes, that was the goal with the...T2.

    Quote Originally Posted by TimBitz View Post
    Overall:
    Lots of power for a light racket. It gives me a bit more confidence in my defensive shots because of the better agility (might be just in my head ). My feeling is that the T2 has more control/accuracy.

    IMHO, I would describe it as feeling like a NS 9000 S and playing better than one. I really like it, and it's currently my "go-to" racket. If I had the $$ I would get another one asap
    Panda won't say it's better than an NS9000-S, the current benchmark doubles racket, but he feels it's comparable.

    Quote Originally Posted by TimBitz View Post
    IMHO, I would describe it as feeling like a NS 9000 S and playing better than one. I really like it, and it's currently my "go-to" racket. If I had the $$ I would get another one asap
    Thanks!

  9. #1233
    Regular Member Blurry D's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Singapore, Yishun
    Posts
    1,810
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    The T2 has arrived Malaysian Shores.. I got 4 left ..

    Please email me at adriankpk@gmaill.com

    Kindly do not PM me

    Thank you.

  10. #1234
    Regular Member visor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    10,258
    Mentioned
    139 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default Trinity 2: another review

    Just finished playing 2 solid hrs of MD with my Trinity 2, which I picked up from Takamsda last week.


    My T2 specs: unstrung 87g, bp 288mm;
    becoming 286mm when strung with BG65 @ 22lbs and overgripped with Yonex 102EX. Because I play mostly plastic Mavis 300 birds (which tend to hit harder than feathers), I chose the heaviest and head heaviest T2 out of the 8 that was available.


    Racket history: Yonex Ti Swing Power Type SS past 6 years, likely heavy 3U or light 2U weight, bp 295mm similarly strung and overgripped.


    Paint:
    Beautiful and shiny, but I can already see some scratches after picking up birds from the floor. Oh well, it's how it plays that is more important... and yowzers! Does it play well!


    Power:
    Compared to my Ti SP, this lighter T2 racket has absolutely no right to have so much more power! It was amazingly effortless to clear forehand and backhand from rear court to rear court! So easy to accelerate and snap the wrist at the right moment and transfer power to the bird. I would have preferred just a smidgen more shaft stiffness, or maybe I'm not used to the flexier feel. (Hmmm...maybe I'll try the Ultra 2 also.) Smashes are bombs when connected properly, but I'm still having a little bit of trouble adjusting to the timing because of the...


    Swing speed:
    The T2 swings so much faster that I was frequently just a bit too early in hitting the bird when smashing. I had to mentally tell myself to hesistate and wait a bit before starting my swing. Very advantageous as it gives me more time to think of placement and even time to fake a deadly drop shot here and there!

    Because the racket is so maneuverable and powerful, it is also very easy to wait for my opponent to commit themselves in a certain direction before I decide to hit it in the other direction with just a simple flick of the wrist. I scored many points doing just this!

    I noticed the faster swing speed made me play more aggressively and faster. I was able to get on top of the bird faster (well, limited by my footwork!) than before and I found that I had a much better choice of attacking shots than before.


    Defence:
    Being so highly maneuverable, I've never appreciated defending from drives, smashes etc until now. I just think of getting my racket there and it's there! And a quick flick of the wrist is all that separates a block to the net from a lift to the back.


    Frame feel and stability:
    Excellent. Somehow the frame resists twisting and the bird just goes where it's pointed, even when hit way off the sweet spot. There doesn't seem to be any dead spots by the edge of the string bed, unlike my Ti SP. Shot feel is beautiful. Very easy to gauge how much to hit the bird, especially for tight drop shots.


    One line summary:
    Stop reading the forums and just get it!


    Afterthoughts:
    + I'm still adjusting to the faster swing speed, especially smashes.
    + To mitigate the new found power and provide even more control, I may consider upping the tension 2-3 lbs.
    + I so wanted to share about my new racket with my playing group, but this "secret weapon" would be my new found advantage over them, so I think I'll wait a bit longer.
    + Car analogy: if the T2 were a car, it would be a BMW M3.


    PS.
    And oh, BTW, Panda should be given full props for bringing these rackets to fruition! Can't wait for the Revelation!!

    Last edited by visor; 01-09-2010 at 04:36 AM.

  11. #1235
    New Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    175
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by visor View Post
    Just finished playing 2 solid hrs of MD with my Trinity 2, which I picked up from Takamsda last week.


    My T2 specs: unstrung 87g, bp 288mm;
    becoming 286mm when strung with BG65 @ 22lbs and overgripped with Yonex 102EX. Because I play mostly plastic Mavis 300 birds (which tend to hit harder than feathers), I chose the heaviest and head heaviest T2 out of the 8 that was available.


    Racket history: Yonex Ti Swing Power Type SS past 6 years, likely heavy 3U or light 2U weight, bp 295mm similarly strung and overgripped.


    Paint:
    Beautiful and shiny, but I can already see some scratches after picking up birds from the floor. Oh well, it's how it plays that is more important... and yowzers! Does it play well!


    Power:
    Compared to my Ti SP, this lighter T2 racket has absolutely no right to have so much more power! It was amazingly effortless to clear forehand and backhand from rear court to rear court! So easy to accelerate and snap the wrist at the right moment and transfer power to the bird. I would have preferred just a smidgen more shaft stiffness, or maybe I'm not used to the flexier feel. (Hmmm...maybe I'll try the Ultra 2 also.) Smashes are bombs when connected properly, but I'm still having a little bit of trouble adjusting to the timing because of the...


    Swing speed:
    The T2 swings so much faster that I was frequently just a bit too early in hitting the bird when smashing. I had to mentally tell myself to hesistate and wait a bit before starting my swing. Very advantageous as it gives me more time to think of placement and even time to fake a deadly drop shot here and there!

    Because the racket is so maneuverable and powerful, it is also very easy to wait for my opponent to commit themselves in a certain direction before I decide to hit it in the other direction with just a simple flick of the wrist. I scored many points doing just this!

    I noticed the faster swing speed made me play more aggressively and faster. I was able to get on top of the bird faster (well, limited by my footwork!) than before and I found that I had a much better choice of attacking shots than before.


    Defence:
    Being so highly maneuverable, I've never appreciated defending from drives, smashes etc until now. I just think of getting my racket there and it's there! And a quick flick of the wrist is all that separates a block to the net from a lift to the back.


    Frame feel and stability:
    Excellent. Somehow the frame resists twisting and the bird just goes where it's pointed, even when hit way off the sweet spot. There doesn't seem to be any dead spots by the edge of the string bed, unlike my Ti SP. Shot feel is beautiful. Very easy to gauge how much to hit the bird, especially for tight drop shots.


    One line summary:
    Stop reading the forums and just get it!


    Afterthoughts:
    + I'm still adjusting to the faster swing speed, especially smashes.
    + To mitigate the new found power and provide even more control, I may consider upping the tension 2-3 lbs.
    + I so wanted to share about my new racket with my playing group, but this "secret weapon" would be my new found advantage over them, so I think I'll wait a bit longer.
    + Car analogy: if the T2 were a car, it would be a BMW M3.


    PS.
    And oh, BTW, Panda should be given full props for bringing these rackets to fruition! Can't wait for the Revelation!!

    All these excellent reviews! Can't wait to get mine

    HAHA, nice animation 8)

  12. #1236
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    usa
    Posts
    25
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Are Panda Power considered serious racquets where they are used in tournament play or are they racquets for the casual player to be played in backyards and gyms with friends or family?

  13. #1237
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Oakville, ON
    Posts
    305
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Ever heard of anyone spending $150 + stringing on a racket to play in backyard???

  14. #1238
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Poland
    Posts
    307
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LiNing1 View Post
    Are Panda Power considered serious racquets where they are used in tournament play or are they racquets for the casual player to be played in backyards and gyms with friends or family?
    This guy is trolling....... or dumb.

  15. #1239
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    court
    Posts
    328
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I was thinking to get 86g @ 286 BP. Currently I play great with Carlton VTT racket which is middle balance and cca. 86g.

    I was not confortable with AT900T racket for example. To stiff I guess and head heavy for me.

    This was Mark A explanation for racket:

    To be fair, a "head heavy" racket from Yonex is in the 300 mm region, so none of the Panda rackets could really be called "head heavy". I think you will be fine with either 286 or 287, but I would choose 286 if I were you. You can have either weight, 86 or 87 grams.

  16. #1240
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    775
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by roy b View Post
    This guy is trolling....... or dumb.
    be nice ! I think he was only asking a question, look like he is new to the site , so give him a chance bro !

  17. #1241
    Regular Member what07's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    914
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I have a backyard badminton set. Cost around 20 dollars on sale, comes with 4 racquets.

    One panda racquet could get me about 6 back yard games going

Similar Threads

  1. List your playing style, main racket, string & string tension
    By neoanderson777 in forum Badminton String
    Replies: 725
    : 10-24-2014, 07:43 AM
  2. Panda Power Ultra 2 Racket!
    By Hakular in forum Racket Recommendation / Comparison
    Replies: 9
    : 02-04-2011, 11:46 PM
  3. String Recommendation for Panda Power Precision
    By kevindd992002 in forum Badminton Rackets / Equipment
    Replies: 1
    : 10-02-2010, 03:50 PM
  4. WTB/FT: Panda Power racket or sotx racket/s. Scarborough Area plz (gta)
    By Kirbit316 in forum Buy & Sell - Read the rules sticky before you post
    Replies: 1
    : 06-05-2010, 11:05 PM
  5. 40lbs string tension
    By Daniel Chen in forum Badminton String
    Replies: 8
    : 06-27-2001, 08:49 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •