Results 1 to 6 of 6
Thread: defensive racquet
05-01-2009, 09:50 AM #1
please tell me which is the best defencive racquet , yonex says the new yonex 9900 is X-Fullerene meterial has 5% increase in repulsion power and 15% greater stability. any one have used it or have an idea it is better for defence or new arcsaber 9 and what kind of armortec 900 technique is it defencive or attacking or please sugest me a racquet . thanks
05-01-2009, 10:05 AM #2
I reckon is the NS9900. I tried it out for 2 hours today since I bought it yesterday.
It is very quick...i would say is even quicker than the AT900 P/T. Havent tried the Arc9 yet so I cant comment.
The power is somewhat significantly lesser than the Arc10, that's my take.
So, for a defensive racket...and a new high-end yonex range racket, I would strongly recommend the NS9900.
05-01-2009, 10:56 AM #3
if you want a defensive racket then a headlight racket will be best as it will be very manouverable. The yonex nanospeed series is all headlight and would be a good choice. If you want a good balance of power and speed the ns8000 is a top racket, but you need to have good technique for this (just like the ns9900). A racket which i also like is the ns4500 which is priced well and is more flexible for an easy swing. The at900t is not really a defensive racket as it has a head heavy set up but the fact that it is quite light and has an aero frame shape means thats it is quite good for defence...hope this helps
05-01-2009, 11:16 AM #4
05-02-2009, 03:17 AM #5
The Kason's Legerity series is great as a defensive racquet however to attack with it is another story.
05-02-2009, 05:02 AM #6
go with the MP66.
By wunderbar in forum Badminton Rackets / EquipmentReplies: 3: 06-04-2011, 09:40 PM
By mrdunkleysexy in forum Racket Recommendation / ComparisonReplies: 9: 09-24-2008, 11:24 AM
By chris in forum Racket Recommendation / ComparisonReplies: 9: 04-14-2002, 01:24 PM
By chris in forum General ForumReplies: 4: 03-25-2002, 06:41 PM
By joseph in forum Racket Recommendation / ComparisonReplies: 11: 10-17-2001, 02:17 PM