User Tag List

Page 21 of 116 FirstFirst ... 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 71 ... LastLast
Results 341 to 357 of 1956

Thread: Zymax strings

  1. #341
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Davis, CA
    Posts
    1,218
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Nice points there kwun. I'd have to agree. ZM67 is a whole different string entirely from 62 and 70 IMO. Control is the only department I am not lacking in, so thats why I prefer 67 right now. But now that my smash is getting better, I'm slowly coming back to 62. The difference is nothing like BG85 to BG80, the difference makes it more like the difference between BG80 to BG66. Both very repulsive, but play differently.

  2. #342
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Hong Kong
    Posts
    6,527
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    How about increasing the tension on ZM67 by 2lbs-3lbs over ZM62.

  3. #343
    Regular Member demolidor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    @Hollanti
    Posts
    11,750
    Mentioned
    22 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    +2lbs is not enough, 3 or 4 would be better but I'm sure the earlybirds in this thread have tried that already?

  4. #344
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Davis, CA
    Posts
    1,218
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I've tried doing that already. ZM62 at 24 vs ZM67 at 25, 26, 27, 28, and 29lbs.

    ZM67 IMO felt closest at 27, but at that tension, it's too difficult to generate power with any of my rackets except for my Zelm PP10K.

  5. #345
    Administrator kwun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Santa Clara, California, United States
    Posts
    35,919
    Mentioned
    54 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by taneepak View Post
    How about increasing the tension on ZM67 by 2lbs-3lbs over ZM62.
    what are you trying to achieve with that? better feel? even better power?

  6. #346
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Leeds, UK
    Posts
    5,436
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I think Strings should be compared on a like for like basis - same tension, same racket. otherwise the comparison isn't fair.

  7. #347
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Hong Kong
    Posts
    6,527
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kwun View Post
    what are you trying to achieve with that? better feel? even better power?
    To approximate the effective tensions of the 2 strings if the thicker string is tensioned higher. However, even if the effective tensions are comparable, the thinner ZM62 will have better playability, AOTBE.

  8. #348
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Davis, CA
    Posts
    1,218
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Kwun, I believe TEP means trying to simulate the feel of a thinner string by stretching the thicker string more, which is what I was trying to do with my experiments. As I'm sure you already know, the goal with this is to get the same feel of a thinner, more fragile string with a thicker, more durable string.

    Jamesd20, I agree with you wholeheartedly. But I always find it interesting to see at what different tensions dissimilar strings will feel the similar, which I especially need to know as someone who strings for others and sells strings as part of my business because customers are always looking for the best results with the least amount of money.

  9. #349
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Hong Kong
    Posts
    6,527
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by singnflip4life View Post
    I've tried doing that already. ZM62 at 24 vs ZM67 at 25, 26, 27, 28, and 29lbs.

    ZM67 IMO felt closest at 27, but at that tension, it's too difficult to generate power with any of my rackets except for my Zelm PP10K.
    It depends on the player. Many players find it difficult to generate power at higher tensions of say 29lbs on ZM67 or even 27lbs on ZM62. However, if you can generate fast hand speed this is not a problem. But this can be overcome by persisting with it.
    Say a player finds it hard to generate easy power on ZM67 at 27lbs, ask him to use it for a while, preferably with a relaxed arm/hand and body as he zeros in for the shot. This will speed up the racquet head speed after a period of adjustment. He will eventually learn how to generate power from a relaxed approach.

  10. #350
    Administrator kwun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Santa Clara, California, United States
    Posts
    35,919
    Mentioned
    54 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    i have played with the ZM62 and ZM67, both strung at 23.5lbs on 2 different ARC10. so i have both available to compare.

    in terms of feel/control, nothing beats ZM62, the stiffer string bed and the response is 2nd to none. ZM67 feels a bit softer and don't have the same type of feedback.

    in term of power, i like ZM67, in fact, ZM67 has quite a big more power and omph than the ZM62. it just explodes into the shuttlecock with a huge bang.

    in term of defense, i also like the ZM67, ZM62 was too stiff to produce the right amount of bounce. while ZM67 just bounces the shuttle way back to the baseline.

    for what i play, i will use ZM62 for mixed where there are a lot more push and touch shots, while i will use ZM67 for the power and defense.

  11. #351
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    TW, SG, HK
    Posts
    7,313
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kwun View Post
    i have played with the ZM62 and ZM67, both strung at 23.5lbs on 2 different ARC10. so i have both available to compare.

    in terms of feel/control, nothing beats ZM62, the stiffer string bed and the response is 2nd to none. ZM67 feels a bit softer and don't have the same type of feedback.

    in term of power, i like ZM67, in fact, ZM67 has quite a big more power and omph than the ZM62. it just explodes into the shuttlecock with a huge bang.

    in term of defense, i also like the ZM67, ZM62 was too stiff to produce the right amount of bounce. while ZM67 just bounces the shuttle way back to the baseline.

    for what i play, i will use ZM62 for mixed where there are a lot more push and touch shots, while i will use ZM67 for the power and defense.
    Thanks for this update Kwun I might give ZM67 next time.

  12. #352
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Orange County CA
    Posts
    16
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    question on the RED strings -- do they leave a mark on the shuttlecock (cork) when you hit with them?

    Or maybe am I remembering those patterns applied to stringbed with red markers which leaves marks on shuttle corks... hmm...

  13. #353
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    944
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kwun View Post
    i have played with the ZM62 and ZM67, both strung at 23.5lbs on 2 different ARC10. so i have both available to compare.

    in terms of feel/control, nothing beats ZM62, the stiffer string bed and the response is 2nd to none. ZM67 feels a bit softer and don't have the same type of feedback.

    in term of power, i like ZM67, in fact, ZM67 has quite a big more power and omph than the ZM62. it just explodes into the shuttlecock with a huge bang.

    in term of defense, i also like the ZM67, ZM62 was too stiff to produce the right amount of bounce. while ZM67 just bounces the shuttle way back to the baseline.

    for what i play, i will use ZM62 for mixed where there are a lot more push and touch shots, while i will use ZM67 for the power and defense.
    Spot on, Kwun. Loooove ZM67.

  14. #354
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    UK, Kent
    Posts
    109
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Hi All

    I made the following comparison between ZM62 and BG66M

    http://www.badmintoncentral.com/foru...t=#post1450014

    As you see I am keen to get hold of some ZM Pro, so I wrote a message on Ashway's facebook wall (http://www.facebook.com/Ashaway?v=wa...d=401540073646 ) and got the following reply, which I thought you all might be interested in
    "Yes, ZyMax 62 is very thin and not for everyone. We do not have plans to stock a 0.65mm string at the moment. However the construction of ZM62 will be changed slightly to increase durability a little, this will be available from September 2010. Can I suggest you try ZyMax 67 in the meantime, it is still very thin, performs well and lasts longer than the ultra fine ZM62."

    Any comments welcome.

  15. #355
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Davis, CA
    Posts
    1,218
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Heh Alpinerock, the "ZM Pro" is still just a prototype. I don't believe a PR rep running a FB page would know anything about the Badminton R&D department's new products except for regarding what has been released already.

  16. #356
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    UK, Kent
    Posts
    109
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Thanks for this singnflip4life. I appreciate that there are forum members such as yourself and Dinkalot whose knowledge of the industry is very much more extensive than my own.

    So I just need to keep watching this space.

  17. #357
    Regular Member DinkAlot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    dcbadminton.net
    Posts
    12,203
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by singnflip4life View Post
    Heh Alpinerock, the "ZM Pro" is still just a prototype. I don't believe a PR rep running a FB page would know anything about the Badminton R&D department's new products except for regarding what has been released already.
    Yep, ZM Pro was actually this Panda's creation; this Panda recommended it to Ashaway to see the differences between the different ZM strings. We found what we were looking for and are presently back at the drawing board to see if anything can be improved.

Page 21 of 116 FirstFirst ... 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 71 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. WTB: Ashaway Zymax 65 strings
    By limsandy in forum Buy & Sell - Read the rules sticky before you post
    Replies: 9
    : 06-14-2012, 11:43 AM
  2. WTB: Ashaway Zymax Strings
    By xzavire in forum Buy & Sell - Read the rules sticky before you post
    Replies: 6
    : 01-23-2012, 01:01 PM
  3. FS/FT: zymax .62mm strings x 6
    By ggman8988 in forum Buy & Sell - Read the rules sticky before you post
    Replies: 0
    : 07-16-2011, 10:24 PM
  4. FS/FT: Zymax 62 Strings sell or trade
    By ggman8988 in forum Buy & Sell - Read the rules sticky before you post
    Replies: 0
    : 07-11-2011, 08:32 PM
  5. Zymax Strings @ Tad's?
    By krisyay in forum Market Place
    Replies: 7
    : 04-22-2010, 01:22 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •