User Tag List

Page 115 of 120 FirstFirst ... 15 65 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 LastLast
Results 1,939 to 1,955 of 2028
  1. #1939
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    673
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    ld_rules: im guessing you had a bad day before, or even you have improved to hit the sweetspot more consistently.
    i've decided to switch back to this racket as, i personally, like you have started to enjoy using this racket.
    the rackets dont have any differences.. had both in my hand last week and they feel the same

  2. #1940
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    MARKHAM
    Posts
    124
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Played the ZS again last night and it is big step above the 10 in my mind. I can generate significantly more speed and power with the ZS. Although Yonex rated it more head heavy than the 10 according to their chart, it does not tire my wrist as much compared to the 10. So for me, its definitely a better racket. And I hit the sweet spot more consistently than the 10 as well.
    I do find I have to pay a little more attention/effort in net play to get it right tho. Overhead and backhand clear is effortless with the ZS. I like it !
    Havent tried the 9900 as no one I know has it, so cant compare the two.
    I play mostly double and my playing style is mostly control/placement, looking for opportunity to smash for the kill.

  3. #1941
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    TW, SG, HK
    Posts
    7,314
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Babyface View Post
    ld_rules: im guessing you had a bad day before, or even you have improved to hit the sweetspot more consistently.
    i've decided to switch back to this racket as, i personally, like you have started to enjoy using this racket.
    the rackets dont have any differences.. had both in my hand last week and they feel the same
    It is quite possible that i had a bad day when i last tried it, but when i last tried it, it wasnt as good as this time. This time was a lot better. It could also be possible that i have improved my consistency, i have been doing a lot of training on overheads and stuff, and a lot of consistency, so i dont rule it out.

    Is it at all possible that the ArcZ i tried the first time wasnt up to QC, because it didnt play as well as the one i tried last night. i havent seen the guy that i borrowed the ArcZ from last time for a while so it will be difficult to try his again, but i will have another go with the ArcZSTH next week, and if i am satisfied i will maybe get one.

    Btw babyface, did you buy 2 pieces of the limited ArcZ or two pieces of the normal ArcZ ?

  4. #1942
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    1,645
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LD rules! View Post
    ... i will have another go with the ArcZSTH next week, and if i am satisfied i will maybe get one.
    Giving up your SW35??

  5. #1943
    Regular Member tckang's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Boleh-Land
    Posts
    733
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LD rules! View Post
    i know all of this, it is just that the Arc Z TH feels better than the Arc ZS that i tried a couple of months ago, maybe i had an off day last time i tried it. The shaft is flexy, in comparsion to what i have been using before, but i think i may have to purchase a 3uG4 just for the fun of it.

    I actually cant believe what i am saying, i have actually gave a complement to the Arc Z. Anyone notice that it plays better with a higher tension ? I was using 28lbs and it felt good.

    @tckang, @ RvS watch this space.
    Amen
    Told you it is not a sissy racket mine is all at 29lbs ....only one word = SYOK

  6. #1944
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    TW, SG, HK
    Posts
    7,314
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by weeyeh View Post
    Giving up your SW35??
    Haha, dont try and make me laugh its far too early in this part of the world, for laughing. i would only be adding to my rather small collection of rackets. I think i need more testing before deciding to buy an Arc Z, before i would ever consider giving up the SW35.

    @tckang, correct me if i am wrong but i dont think i ever said it was a sissy racket however i am actually convinced that the first time i tried the racket, that there was something wrong with that Arc Z, as it performed poorly in comparison to the one i tried the other night. 28lbs+ seems a good tension for the racket.

  7. #1945
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    3,992
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LD rules! View Post
    Haha, dont try and make me laugh its far too early in this part of the world, for laughing. i would only be adding to my rather small collection of rackets. I think i need more testing before deciding to buy an Arc Z, before i would ever consider giving up the SW35.

    @tckang, correct me if i am wrong but i dont think i ever said it was a sissy racket however i am actually convinced that the first time i tried the racket, that there was something wrong with that Arc Z, as it performed poorly in comparison to the one i tried the other night. 28lbs+ seems a good tension for the racket.
    Looking at the YY sponsored players in Denmark Open I think it is quite fair to call it a sissy racket. Mostly girls using it (with some notable exceptions of Tago, Matuseak)

    /Twobeer

  8. #1946
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Bangor,Gloucestershire, Scotla
    Posts
    442
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    i know about 8 ppl with this racket atleast 5 of which have already reverted back to there old favourites as there power and general game went down the pan with this racket. The others still insist its good even though there game is noticably worse.

  9. #1947
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    court
    Posts
    642
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LD rules! View Post
    i know all of this, it is just that the Arc Z TH feels better than the Arc ZS that i tried a couple of months ago, maybe i had an off day last time i tried it. The shaft is flexy, in comparsion to what i have been using before, but i think i may have to purchase a 3uG4 just for the fun of it.

    I actually cant believe what i am saying, i have actually gave a complement to the Arc Z. Anyone notice that it plays better with a higher tension ? I was using 28lbs and it felt good.

    Btw, my smashes were terrific at higher tensions but when I loosen it up to 26/28 string tension, everything else works like a charm to me except for the smash losing its mighty ooomph!

    @tckang, @ RvS watch this space.
    Now that I've sold my ARC ZS JP 2uG4...and you're telling us sorta. kinda like the Arc ZS TH? My personal opinion would be that you had a really great day when you toyed with the TH. Maybe another day will be totally different. Please let us know the shelf life of your SW35 as per latest encounter with the TH!
    Last edited by RSLvictorSOTX; 10-31-2010 at 02:47 PM.

  10. #1948
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    4,154
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Winex's version of the ArcZ. Why cant Yonex come up with such colors?
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  11. #1949
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    malaysia
    Posts
    35
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sealman View Post
    Winex's version of the ArcZ. Why cant Yonex come up with such colors?
    weird looking but the painting looks alike like YY Zs.. Copycat..!!

  12. #1950
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    TW, SG, HK
    Posts
    7,314
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I am going to try out the ArcZ again on wednesday, if it is any good, i will maybe get one, sort of looking forward to it

    Btw the Winex Green version looks cool.

  13. #1951
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    673
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    been using it for the whole of the day in 2 sessions for both singles and doubles... and in comparison with before (my initial purchase) the racket is indeed nice to use. i think out of all the rackets i have used, this could be the keeper (for me)

  14. #1952
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    sabah,malaysia
    Posts
    69
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    right now im using apacs arc saber z spark..im really love it....cmpre to yonex arc saber z slash..i mre prefer on apacs one....u need to try first..

  15. #1953
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    stickford, boston, england
    Posts
    62
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    were can you get those winex racket's from??? they look awsome

  16. #1954
    Regular Member yurimaster2010's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    MY
    Posts
    1,014
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    anyone notice any performance diff between Arc ZS TH and Arc ZS ?

  17. #1955
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    TW, SG, HK
    Posts
    7,314
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by yurimaster2010 View Post
    anyone notice any performance diff between Arc ZS TH and Arc ZS ?
    This has been covered before, please search instead of posting questions, that have been asked before.

Similar Threads

  1. Yonex Arcsaber Z-Slash Taufik Review
    By cycilver in forum Badminton Rackets / Equipment
    Replies: 53
    : 06-02-2012, 03:11 AM
  2. FS/FT: Yonex 9900 for ArcSaber Z Slash/ArcSaber 8DX/MX 80
    By ghooga in forum Buy & Sell - Read the rules sticky before you post
    Replies: 5
    : 12-31-2011, 11:33 AM
  3. Yonex ArcSaber 10 or ArcSaber Z Slash or Voltric 80 or AT900 P or Victor MX80
    By Polaroid in forum Racket Recommendation / Comparison
    Replies: 9
    : 04-05-2011, 03:25 PM
  4. FS /FT : Yonex Arcsaber Z-Slash With YY NS9900 / YY Arcsaber 8DX
    By ishak.ahmad in forum Buy & Sell - Read the rules sticky before you post
    Replies: 2
    : 04-16-2010, 05:42 AM
  5. My new ArcSaber z-slash! Review
    By MarcAs11 in forum Racket Recommendation / Comparison
    Replies: 8
    : 03-03-2010, 11:33 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •