Results 1 to 17 of 43
Thread: advice for a newb - Nikon D300s
02-23-2010, 11:02 PM #1
advice for a newb - Nikon D300s
I am new to DSLRs and I am thinking of getting a Nikon D300s. Plan to use it for a lots of stuff and badminton photos definitely being one of them. Any advice on my choice will be helpful. I'd like to know what kind of lenses I should be looking for as well.
02-24-2010, 12:09 AM #2
D300s is definitely an excellent choice as I find that my D90 is pretty good for everything that I use it for. For badminton (like many other sports), lens choice is crucial for taking good photos. You will definitely need a F2.8 or larger aperture lenses if you plan to shoot badminton photos.
02-24-2010, 01:03 PM #3
as for the rest of advice, this thread (one of several) below has lots of good advice
Last edited by ctjcad; 02-24-2010 at 01:05 PM.
03-02-2010, 01:04 AM #4
If money isn't a issue, get the D90. If it is, try looking for a D40. I have a D40 right now. It's a very good camera out of the box.
03-02-2010, 04:05 AM #5
03-02-2010, 06:08 AM #6
I think the lenses are much more important... get a expensive lenses
03-02-2010, 11:24 AM #7
For badminton both body and lenses are equally important. You set up is only as good as its weakest link. So for people shooting with d90-d40 and xti-t2i you will have considerable shutter lag and slower continuous frame rate. Getting something like d200-d300s, d700, d2 or d3 series, 40d and 50d, 7d or even 1d mkII, mkIII will give you tons more control and a lot better performance. For bodies I recommend no less than a 40d for canon and no less than d200 for nikon. Ideally you would want the newest from either brands "prosumer" line, and of course if you can get your hands on any of their pro bodies then you're golden.
"Expensive lens'" shouldnt be what you're looking for, but rather fast, quality lenses. Yes they do usually cost more, but just because its expensive doesnt mean it will be good. There is another thread that outlines this but a good 35mm, 50mm and 85mm all with f/1.8 aperture or better should be what you're looking for. You can also try zooms like 70-200 f/2.8 or 24-70 or 17-55 however those are going to be a lot "slower" and you will certainly get motion blur if youre snapping while they're swinging.
03-02-2010, 12:00 PM #8
03-02-2010, 12:03 PM #9
03-03-2010, 04:59 AM #10
03-03-2010, 06:15 PM #11
this iswhat i heard and read: nikon has better performing bodies than others byut canon blows the rest of the competitions with their amazing lens selection.
03-03-2010, 07:16 PM #12
03-04-2010, 06:36 PM #13
The D300s is a great choice! If you are not married to either brand (canon vs nikon) I would highly recommend trying out the 7D as well. Both are similarly priced and spec'ed. The 7d has better video vs the D300s. But the D300s will produce better images ( I shoot Nikon)..
Like many threads both here or any other forums, the body will only be part the equation. For shooting badminton, a fast prime lens would be your best bet. Depends how far you are from the players. If you are at your local club, and can be by or at least near the sideline, a 35,50, or 85 prime would be your best bet. If you are shooting at a bigger event and dont have a press pass, you might be shooting from the stands, at which point a f2.8 telezoom will be your main lens along with a stable monopod.
My advice for a nice "complete" (it is never complete!!) would be
This would be a great starter kit and will grow with you. Rather than spending money on lower end equipment and having to sell at a loss later. This is provided that you have made the decision to take this hobby up seriously.
03-05-2010, 05:42 AM #14
But as far as I've tried and compared, the Canon 17-55 f/2.8 IS is the better lens compared to the Nikon version. But if budget is a great constraint, do give the Tamron 17-50 f/2.8 VC a consideration. Great image quality at a great price, though a little bit slower than the Canon version in focus acquisition (mounted on a Canon 50D). On par or slightly faster compared to the Nikon version mounted on a D200.
For APS-C, the Sigma 30mm f/1.4 is something well worth considering. Sharp and fast.
As for the 70-200 f/2.8, both the Canon and Nikon versions will outperform the 3rd party offerings( till now and as far as I've seen). Unless the new Sigma one is a real 'killer' ..
03-09-2010, 11:32 PM #15
I have a D90, and when I bought it, my rationale was:
Buy the cheapest camera possible that satisfies your needs. Its digital, it will be outdated eventually.
The D90 is the lowest Id go in the Nikon line because below that there are no AF motor lower than D90.
The main difference between the D90 and the D300/D300s is the better AF and better build quality. AF is nice, but really 12 (or whatever) sensors is enough. I only use 1 sensor 99% of the time anyway, cos with auto-sensor it may not be exactly where I want. Im not a professional, and take reasonable care of my equipment.
The other sweet spot IMO is the D700.
Spend the extra money on lenses, flash, tripod, etc.
03-09-2010, 11:36 PM #16
03-10-2010, 12:30 AM #17
With good glass, I am sure I can take some badminton photos with my D90 but of course there will be some limitations. I've had mine for about 8 or 9 months and its awesome. Especially when I use my 50.8 for various shots
By kikks9 in forum Badminton PhotographyReplies: 38: 11-02-2010, 12:29 AM