User Tag List

Page 20 of 36 FirstFirst ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 ... LastLast
Results 324 to 340 of 610
  1. #324
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    SG
    Posts
    230
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Do you guys have more success with this racket at higher string tension (>24 LBs) or at lower tension (<24).

    Thanks

  2. #325
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    TW, SG, HK
    Posts
    7,314
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by txv611 View Post
    Do you guys have more success with this racket at higher string tension (>24 LBs) or at lower tension (<24).

    Thanks
    whichever string tension you usually use, you should stick with that.

  3. #326
    Regular Member Densha's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Badminton Court
    Posts
    146
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I have received my SW 35 with some other victor stuff, I cannot do any review yet because it is too soon but here are some pics :





  4. #327
    Regular Member Alapongtai's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    277
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    anyone have any input on the 4u version of sw35?

  5. #328
    Regular Member Maklike Tier's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    3,190
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LD rules! View Post
    whichever string tension you usually use, you should stick with that.
    However if you've bought it fully knowing that it will be too stiff for you, you'll need to lower the tension

  6. #329
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    TW, SG, HK
    Posts
    7,314
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alapongtai View Post
    anyone have any input on the 4u version of sw35?
    Slightly less power, better defense over 3U

    Quote Originally Posted by Maklike Tier View Post
    However if you've bought it fully knowing that it will be too stiff for you, you'll need to lower the tension
    Yeah, thats a good point, it would depend on what you used previously.

  7. #330
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    SG
    Posts
    230
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Comparing sw35 to yy ns9900, which one is stiffer? And by how much?

  8. #331
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    court
    Posts
    642
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    SiW35 is about the same stiffness as NS9900. SiW35 is slightly head heavy while NS9900 is head light. So, if you're wondering about the difference while pounding both with the same fierceness, then, that's probably where the feel differs which ca be misconstrued as stiffer or lighter.

    Neither is less stiff...both are in the ultra stiff category.

  9. #332
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    SG
    Posts
    230
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Thanks. I compared the Sw35 to my yy ns9900, I felt my sw35 (24 lbs) has slightly more vibration than the yy ns9900. Is that normal? According to elaine, Victor has no problem with vibration at all.

    But seems like not so... perhaps thats why they are came out with the "shockless" technology in the new BS12?


    Quote Originally Posted by RSLvictorSOTX View Post
    SiW35 is about the same stiffness as NS9900. SiW35 is slightly head heavy while NS9900 is head light. So, if you're wondering about the difference while pounding both with the same fierceness, then, that's probably where the feel differs which ca be misconstrued as stiffer or lighter.

    Neither is less stiff...both are in the ultra stiff category.

  10. #333
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    court
    Posts
    642
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by txv611 View Post
    Thanks. I compared the Sw35 to my yy ns9900, I felt my sw35 (24 lbs) has slightly more vibration than the yy ns9900. Is that normal? According to elaine, Victor has no problem with vibration at all.

    But seems like not so... perhaps thats why they are came out with the "shockless" technology in the new BS12?
    Although mine are strung at 26/28 and 28/30 respectively (btw, the 26/28 is a better setup for me), I haven't experience any kind of vibration nor did I with my NS9900. The difference probably was that my JP version NS9900 came at 2UG3 (reason why I stayed with the grip) while my SiW35 came in at 3uG5 (both sticks), therefore I tore off the stock grip and slap in my own grip, as a result no vibration (However, I can not be sure if it would've been any different had I use the stock grip.).

  11. #334
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    SG
    Posts
    230
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Your own grip on yr sw35.... may I ask what grip is that? Thanks


    Quote Originally Posted by RSLvictorSOTX View Post
    Although mine are strung at 26/28 and 28/30 respectively (btw, the 26/28 is a better setup for me), I haven't experience any kind of vibration nor did I with my NS9900. The difference probably was that my JP version NS9900 came at 2UG3 (reason why I stayed with the grip) while my SiW35 came in at 3uG5 (both sticks), therefore I tore off the stock grip and slap in my own grip, as a result no vibration (However, I can not be sure if it would've been any different had I use the stock grip.).

  12. #335
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    court
    Posts
    642
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by txv611 View Post
    Your own grip on yr sw35.... may I ask what grip is that? Thanks
    Karakal PU super grip (replacement) and Yonex super grap (overgrip).

  13. #336
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Cheras, Malaysia
    Posts
    260
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RSLvictorSOTX View Post
    Although mine are strung at 26/28 and 28/30 respectively (btw, the 26/28 is a better setup for me)
    may i know which string you used?..

  14. #337
    Administrator kwun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Santa Clara, California, United States
    Posts
    35,945
    Mentioned
    54 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    ok. so here is my review on the Victor Superwave 35.

    as some of you already know, i have a very high regard for the SW35. to me, the SW35 is like AT700 done right.

    i borrowed a demo SW35 from racketsupply.com, the US distributor of Victor, for 2 weeks to test.

    the SW35 was strung with BG65 at an unknown tension, frequency shows that it is somewhere around 27lbs but with the tension loss of BG65, it is hard to tell what the original tension was. either way, it was to the stiff side.

    the racket was a 4U spec, but even so, it feels heavy due to the balance. the SW35 is head heavy, VERY head heavy.

    however, it is only deceptively heavy. even though it was at the top end of 4U, it is still 4U light and have very decent maneuverability.

    power is one of the main strength of the SW35, every time one pushes it hard, the SW35 rewards the player with a very fast and power boom that propels the shuttle forward at great velocity. the impact is hard, crisp and solid. i have never experienced any racket that feel as solid as the SW35. it stand out among all the Yonexes that i have tried. it is pure pleasure to smash with it. however it is not the most forgiving racket so i would not recommend it to a beginner.

    the other strength is the feel. very very few rackets in the market actually poses a good feel. in fact, only a few top end racket has it. what is feel? a solid impact and feedback back to the player hand. most mid and even some high end rackets have a hollow feel to it. many other good rackets, like AT700 / ARC10 / etc have a much more pronounce solid feel and crisp feedback. the SW35 however, is in its own league. each impact produce a very solid feedback, like hitting with a steel rod, yet it is light and critically damped without any excess vibration. that is priceless.

    the stiff shaft plus a solid feel makes control excellent. touch shots are very easy to make. torsional stability is very well controlled. off center shots do not go way off.

    most importantly, the racket is very lively despite the stiffness. any squeeze of the fingers or snap of the wrist the shuttlecock bounces off as command. the crispiness of the shot is unrivaled by most top end rackets from other brands.

    speed however is not the best character of the racket. with the super head heavy balance, even though it is faster than the Armortecs, it is slightly slower than the Arcsabers and Nanospeeds. this makes the SW35 ideal for attacking doubles players who like to hits lots of power shots at the back courts. which i believe is why this is the racket of choice for Jung Jae Sung.

    while speed is not the best for the SW35, defense is not only about speed. the liveliness of the racket makes up for the lack of speed. a tightening of the finger and flick of the wrist is enough to give the SW35 enough velocity to bounce the shuttle back deep into the baseline.

    having said all those, the SW35 is not the most forgiving racket, you as the player need to have enough power to propel it in order to take advantage of the stiff yet lively SW35. beginners without a lot of strength will unlikely to find it an appealing racket. while the bar of entry is high, when one has the ability to command it, it is one very very sweet racket.

    overall, i am extremely impressed by the SW35. so much so that i plan to get one for myself. as for whether it will unseat my most beloved ARC10, it remains to be seen. it will be a tough decision.

  15. #338
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    SG
    Posts
    230
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Kwun,

    Just curious when you said you estimate the tension based on the "frequency" of the sound you hear.

    Assuming that I have 2 different brand rackets, will they sound the same frequency at the same tension?

    I have hear people saying they can judge from sound but doesnt the sound produced also depending on the material of the rackets?

  16. #339
    Administrator kwun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Santa Clara, California, United States
    Posts
    35,945
    Mentioned
    54 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by txv611 View Post
    Kwun,

    Just curious when you said you estimate the tension based on the "frequency" of the sound you hear.

    Assuming that I have 2 different brand rackets, will they sound the same frequency at the same tension?

    I have hear people saying they can judge from sound but doesnt the sound produced also depending on the material of the rackets?
    it depends more on the shape of the racket than the material. it also depends on the type of string and tension, as well as how the stringer strings it. there are many factors thus the actual tension is only an approximate.

  17. #340
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Brunei & Malaysia
    Posts
    178
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kwun View Post
    ok. so here is my review on the Victor Superwave 35.

    as some of you already know, i have a very high regard for the SW35. to me, the SW35 is like AT700 done right.

    i borrowed a demo SW35 from racketsupply.com, the US distributor of Victor, for 2 weeks to test.

    the SW35 was strung with BG65 at an unknown tension, frequency shows that it is somewhere around 27lbs but with the tension loss of BG65, it is hard to tell what the original tension was. either way, it was to the stiff side.

    the racket was a 4U spec, but even so, it feels heavy due to the balance. the SW35 is head heavy, VERY head heavy.

    however, it is only deceptively heavy. even though it was at the top end of 4U, it is still 4U light and have very decent maneuverability.

    power is one of the main strength of the SW35, every time one pushes it hard, the SW35 rewards the player with a very fast and power boom that propels the shuttle forward at great velocity. the impact is hard, crisp and solid. i have never experienced any racket that feel as solid as the SW35. it stand out among all the Yonexes that i have tried. it is pure pleasure to smash with it. however it is not the most forgiving racket so i would not recommend it to a beginner.

    the other strength is the feel. very very few rackets in the market actually poses a good feel. in fact, only a few top end racket has it. what is feel? a solid impact and feedback back to the player hand. most mid and even some high end rackets have a hollow feel to it. many other good rackets, like AT700 / ARC10 / etc have a much more pronounce solid feel and crisp feedback. the SW35 however, is in its own league. each impact produce a very solid feedback, like hitting with a steel rod, yet it is light and critically damped without any excess vibration. that is priceless.

    the stiff shaft plus a solid feel makes control excellent. touch shots are very easy to make. torsional stability is very well controlled. off center shots do not go way off.

    most importantly, the racket is very lively despite the stiffness. any squeeze of the fingers or snap of the wrist the shuttlecock bounces off as command. the crispiness of the shot is unrivaled by most top end rackets from other brands.

    speed however is not the best character of the racket. with the super head heavy balance, even though it is faster than the Armortecs, it is slightly slower than the Arcsabers and Nanospeeds. this makes the SW35 ideal for attacking doubles players who like to hits lots of power shots at the back courts. which i believe is why this is the racket of choice for Jung Jae Sung.

    while speed is not the best for the SW35, defense is not only about speed. the liveliness of the racket makes up for the lack of speed. a tightening of the finger and flick of the wrist is enough to give the SW35 enough velocity to bounce the shuttle back deep into the baseline.

    having said all those, the SW35 is not the most forgiving racket, you as the player need to have enough power to propel it in order to take advantage of the stiff yet lively SW35. beginners without a lot of strength will unlikely to find it an appealing racket. while the bar of entry is high, when one has the ability to command it, it is one very very sweet racket.

    overall, i am extremely impressed by the SW35. so much so that i plan to get one for myself. as for whether it will unseat my most beloved ARC10, it remains to be seen. it will be a tough decision.
    Hello Kwun,

    thank you very much for the review..even more, it's from a hardcore Arc10 owner.

    upon reading your review of your 4U Sw35, saying that it's a tad slower than the Arcsabers (3U)..I must say it does makes me abit scared of getting the 3U as I am a 99.999% doubles player.

Page 20 of 36 FirstFirst ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. FS: Victor Super Waves 35 (3 x Matching Set) and Victor The Legend Zhao Jian Hua Racquet
    By tpcml in forum Buy & Sell - Read the rules sticky before you post
    Replies: 7
    : 01-22-2012, 05:16 AM
  2. victor super waves 37 vs super waves 35
    By TheSmasherKing in forum Badminton Rackets / Equipment
    Replies: 4
    : 10-31-2011, 04:42 AM
  3. FS: Victor Power Waves 11 & Super Waves 31
    By cappius in forum Buy & Sell - Read the rules sticky before you post
    Replies: 0
    : 08-24-2008, 08:20 PM
  4. Victor Power Waves 12 or Victor Super Nano 5
    By rexlu in forum Racket Recommendation / Comparison
    Replies: 27
    : 10-21-2007, 02:12 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •