Thread: Victor Super Waves 35
06-06-2011, 03:25 PM #409
06-15-2011, 03:32 PM #410
So I finally caved, as one of my AT900T's broke I just had to. Should be coming friday or saturday. 3U btw, should be okay since my AT was 3U as well.
06-15-2011, 03:48 PM #411
06-15-2011, 03:50 PM #412
I wondered about the MX80 too, but I heard and read so much about the solid feeling of he SW35, which is exactly what I search for so I had to take this one. I like a little weight in the head
06-15-2011, 04:12 PM #413
nope, I think you made the right choice it's exactly what you are looking for.
06-17-2011, 07:27 AM #414
I got it today, will be playing with it in about 4 hours, I can't wait. Racket strung with VS-850, at about 10KG=22-23. Little lower than usual, but we will see.
06-18-2011, 04:56 PM #415
So what was the verdict ?
06-18-2011, 05:50 PM #416
Very happy with it so far, seems to be more powerful than my AT900T but also quicker in drive/frontcourt rallies. Problably due to the stiffer shaft. Have to play more than 1,5 hours to give a full review though. So far it's my go to racket for sure.
06-19-2011, 07:19 AM #417
I have a whole different experience though. AT900T is quicker and better in defense to me. The SW35 is quite sluggish but a little more powerful. I have used it quite a couple of times. Yet I can't find myself using it regularly. Every time I still go back to my AT900T. Having said all this, racket preference is something personal. What works for me might be work for others.
You should use it longer before judging it. I have made this mistake when I first picked up the ARCZS. My first time with it was fantastic and I jumped into buying another one immediately. Now I have 2 of them lying in my storeroom.
06-19-2011, 12:06 PM #418
Yeah that kind of happened to me and the VT70, got 2 of those, luckily my dad likes it a lot That's why I won't be buying a second one anytime soon (and because summerbreak is coming ) and will be testing/playing with the racket thoroughly. The BP's pf my AT900T and SW35 only vary by a mm or 2, and both aren't sluggish at all to me.
06-19-2011, 08:18 PM #419
Guys, what are you finding is the average BP for your SW35s, and what coding are they?
A year ago I had one but never recorded it's stats, and I'm loosely contemplating either getting another MX80 or trying to get something with a BP over 300 mostly for singles (my MX80 is 299).
07-02-2011, 05:33 AM #420
What is the main differences comparing (3UG5)SW35 to Ti10 (3rd)? BP, shaft stiffness, aerodynamics=aero/box from which point, frame width etc.
I am thinking of getting one of them. I play mostly doubles.
07-02-2011, 11:13 AM #421
may i know what the diff between sw35,36,37 ?
07-04-2011, 05:19 PM #422
07-11-2011, 06:50 PM #423
I got my Super Waves 35 yesterday. Had a hit for about 2 hours.
4UG2, strung with NG95, 27lbs. It is pretty stiff. Stiffer than my 5 year old YY900power. Longer shaft by about 10mm, but slightly thicker than 900power.
Smaller head frame than 900power. looks square-ish. Almost same thickness as 900power, but aero frame.
The smaller head = smaller sweet spot = more focused power = for advance players.
Will post more reviews next month or so,
07-24-2011, 10:42 PM #424
My plan backfired.
Ordered a 4U SW35 from RKEP Eric which arrived at my door just now. Replacement gripped it with my usual RKEP Supermaster, and the BP is only 295! My MX80 is more headheavy at 299 Was hoping for something in the 305 range.
I'll have a hit with it tomorrow night and see what it feels like on court. I think regardless it will be a good companion piece for my MX80, but I'm a little bit bummed.
07-25-2011, 06:50 PM #425
By tpcml in forum Buy & Sell - Read the rules sticky before you postReplies: 7: 01-22-2012, 05:16 AM
By TheSmasherKing in forum Badminton Rackets / EquipmentReplies: 4: 10-31-2011, 04:42 AM
By cappius in forum Buy & Sell - Read the rules sticky before you postReplies: 0: 08-24-2008, 08:20 PM
By rexlu in forum Racket Recommendation / ComparisonReplies: 27: 10-21-2007, 02:12 PM