User Tag List

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 17 of 23
  1. #1
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Brooklyn, New York
    Posts
    26
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Thumbs up My Review: Apacs Superlight vs. Karakal M-Tec 70 Gel Iso

    I own these two rackets because they're undoubtedly the lightest rackets in the world. The Superlight weighs about 72-74 grams while the Karakal weighs about 70. Now here's what I thought about the Superlight: It actually feels lighter than the Karakal. However, when you swing the racket or bend it, you hear this cracking noises. It only feels like it's going to crack, but it's not really going to break. It's actually very high quality and flexible, but the noise is annoying. The paint job is shiny, and it separates you from the majority. I've gotten many comments about it. This racket is head heavy, so it compensates for the power loss for being the lightest racket in world. It costs about $ 70.
    Now for the Karakal: It doesn't feel 70 grams. It supposedly the lightest racket in the world, but it doesn't feel like it. The Superlight, I think, is the lightest, even though it weighs more? Maybe the reason for it being heavier than the Superlight is because it's a lot more solid. There's no noises of any kind whatsoever. I guess the gel technology helps for it to become super durable for a 70 gram racket. The overall quality is excellent. The paint job resembles the skin of a zebra. It's one of the most cool looking rackets out there. And badminton is 80 % looks, as in style and appearance, and 20 % everything else ; ) This racket is not head heavy, but just balanced. It costs about $ 100.
    I believe that these rackets are equal when you compare their pros and cons. If you want the lightest racket in the world, buy the Superlight for $ 30 less. Its only problem is the noise I mentioned, but it's super easy to maneuver. It's lightning fast. If you want an overall better quality with no noise, buy the Karakal. By the way, both of these rackets have isometric heads. I think light rackets are definitely an advantage. If you're a good player, you already have the power and technique. Light rackets only make your reactions super fast to get the defensive shots.

  2. #2
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Brooklyn, New York
    Posts
    26
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Thumbs up My Review: Apacs Superlight vs. Karakal M-Tec 70 Gel Iso

    I own these two rackets because they're undoubtedly the lightest rackets in the world. The Superlight weighs about 72-74 grams while the Karakal weighs about 70. Now here's what I thought about the Superlight: It actually feels lighter than the Karakal. However, when you swing the racket or bend it, you hear this cracking noises. It only feels like it's going to crack, but it's not really going to break. It's actually very high quality and flexible, but the noise is annoying. The paint job is shiny, and it separates you from the majority. I've gotten many comments about it. This racket is head heavy, so it compensates for the power loss for being the lightest racket in world. It costs about $ 70.
    Now for the Karakal: It doesn't feel 70 grams. It supposedly the lightest racket in the world, but it doesn't feel like it. The Superlight, I think, is the lightest, even though it weighs more? Maybe the reason for it being heavier than the Superlight is because it's a lot more solid. There's no noises of any kind whatsoever. I guess the gel technology helps for it to become super durable for a 70 gram racket. The overall quality is excellent. The paint job resembles the skin of a zebra. It's one of the most cool looking rackets out there. And badminton is 80 % looks, as in style and appearance, and 20 % everything else ; ) This racket is not head heavy, but just balanced. It costs about $ 100.
    I believe that these rackets are equal when you compare their pros and cons. If you want the lightest racket in the world, buy the Superlight for $ 30 less. Its only problem is the noise I mentioned, but it's super easy to maneuver. It's lightning fast. If you want an overall better quality with no noise, buy the Karakal. By the way, both of these rackets have isometric heads. I think light rackets are definitely an advantage. If you're a good player, you already have the power and technique. Light rackets only make your reactions super fast to get the defensive shots.

  3. #3
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Israel
    Posts
    405
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    i got the SL75
    super awesome racket (for smashing) when strung with gosen bioroots 66

  4. #4
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Nottingham, UK
    Posts
    1,719
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by angeleyes1c13 View Post
    I own these two rackets because they're undoubtedly the lightest rackets in the world. The Superlight weighs about 72-74 grams while the Karakal weighs about 70. Now here's what I thought about the Superlight: It actually feels lighter than the Karakal. However, when you swing the racket or bend it, you hear this cracking noises. It only feels like it's going to crack, but it's not really going to break. It's actually very high quality and flexible, but the noise is annoying. The paint job is shiny, and it separates you from the majority. I've gotten many comments about it. This racket is head heavy, so it compensates for the power loss for being the lightest racket in world. It costs about $ 70.
    Now for the Karakal: It doesn't feel 70 grams. It supposedly the lightest racket in the world, but it doesn't feel like it. The Superlight, I think, is the lightest, even though it weighs more? Maybe the reason for it being heavier than the Superlight is because it's a lot more solid. There's no noises of any kind whatsoever. I guess the gel technology helps for it to become super durable for a 70 gram racket. The overall quality is excellent. The paint job resembles the skin of a zebra. It's one of the most cool looking rackets out there. And badminton is 80 % looks, as in style and appearance, and 20 % everything else ; ) This racket is not head heavy, but just balanced. It costs about $ 100.
    I believe that these rackets are equal when you compare their pros and cons. If you want the lightest racket in the world, buy the Superlight for $ 30 less. Its only problem is the noise I mentioned, but it's super easy to maneuver. It's lightning fast. If you want an overall better quality with no noise, buy the Karakal. By the way, both of these rackets have isometric heads. I think light rackets are definitely an advantage. If you're a good player, you already have the power and technique. Light rackets only make your reactions super fast to get the defensive shots.
    Not a bad review. I believe that both rackets weight about the same (with the Karakal possibly just being a little bit lighter) with a grip and strings. As you may or may not know, Karakal take their weight measurements before the racket is strung or has a grip applied. This, in my opinion, is the most accurate way to do it as different grips and strings weigh different amounts. Anyway, because of the way Karakal measure their rackets' weights, you can expect the racket in playable condition to weigh a little more than advertised.

    I agree with your opinion on the solidity of the M-Tec 70, it was the first thing that struck me when I hit with it for the first time. You'd think a racket that light would just feel flimsy and brittle but it really doesn't. At this point in time, I can't speak for the Apacs racket in question but I hope to try it soon.

    As for using a really light racket, I'm not so sure of the benefits. I currently use the M-Tec 70 but I have added lead added to it to make it more head-heavy and give it a heavier static weight. If you're a beginner or intermediate, chances are you may not have the racket head speed to get much out of these really light rackets. Advanced players would be able to get enough power from these rackets but I found that it stock form, the M-Tec 70 was just too light. If I was playing a tough match and got pushed from the forecourt, at the net to right on the baseline, I'd really have to put a lot of effort in to hitting a clear in order to make it go deep enough. Of course, some lead or athletic tape can sort that problem out but overall, the superlight rackets seem mainly suited to doubles specialists and racket customisation experts.

  5. #5
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Brooklyn, New York
    Posts
    26
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Thanks for the comments. Both strings were replaced by Yonex BG-80. I also used the same overgrip. Even though Apacs is listed as 2-4 grams more, and head heavier than Karakal, I still feel that the Superlight is lighter.

  6. #6
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Brooklyn, New York
    Posts
    26
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Both strings were replaced by Yonex BG-80. I also used the same overgrip. Even though Apacs is listed as 2-4 grams more, and head heavier than Karakal, I still feel that the Superlight is lighter.

  7. #7
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Israel
    Posts
    405
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    not every company weights the rackets in the same way...
    anyway the BG80 is very good as well

  8. #8
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    75
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Thank you for your review...too bad Superlight has been discontinued.

  9. #9
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Edmonton, AB
    Posts
    1,534
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I think you need to actually measure their weight in playing form to see which is actually lighter. Find a good digital postage scale (or other) that is accurate to 0.1 grams. I weight all my rackets when I get them, as well as balance point, in order to determine whether they meet spec and how they will play.

  10. #10
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    41
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Thanks for the review. The information is good to know and useful.

  11. #11
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Brooklyn, New York
    Posts
    26
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by druss View Post
    I think you need to actually measure their weight in playing form to see which is actually lighter. Find a good digital postage scale (or other) that is accurate to 0.1 grams. I weight all my rackets when I get them, as well as balance point, in order to determine whether they meet spec and how they will play.
    In "playing form," the Superlight is still lighter. And in terms of actual weight, I'm not planning on getting a digital postage scale that is accurate to 0.1 grams.

  12. #12
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Brooklyn, New York
    Posts
    26
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    All company should have a standard on how to weigh rackets. That way, everyone is happy. I mean, if there's no standard, you can only compare the rackets by actually weighing them on a scale. And yeah, Superlight is being replaced by Apacs Tantrum Light Exclusive.

  13. #13
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Edmonton, AB
    Posts
    1,534
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    In "playing form" the superlight may just be head light not actually lighter. You don't really know which unless you weight them. It was a piece of advise... nothing more.

  14. #14
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Brooklyn, New York
    Posts
    26
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by druss View Post
    In "playing form" the superlight may just be head light not actually lighter. You don't really know which unless you weight them. It was a piece of advise... nothing more.
    Yeah I know = ) I doubt it because the Superlight is actually head heavy while the Karakal is not. But when I tried both of them when playing, the Superlight still seems lighter. Not every company weighs their rackets the same way. All company should have a standard on how to weigh rackets. That way, everyone is happy. I mean, if there's no standard, you can only compare the rackets by actually weighing them on a scale. And Karakal weighs their rackets without string and no grip whatsoever.

  15. #15
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Edmonton, AB
    Posts
    1,534
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    That's true but then adding a grip would make the karakal feel head lighter if anything. As a note, I've been weighing a lot of rackets lately and some of them are not within their weight or balance specs.

  16. #16
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    75
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    ^You are right...but I also notice there is a Lethal Light Special. I wonder if it is improved version of the Superlight too...

  17. #17
    New Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Farnham
    Posts
    1
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Advantage of a light racket

    I own the Karakal which I bought to help me get over an elbow joint problem. I was advised that using the light weight racket would give me time to recover and now I wouldn't go back. I have added a little head weight to it though which helped get a bit of power back into it, but doing this hasnt slowed it down any. Its very well made and well worth considering if you have an elbow strain.

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Karakal XS-600 Superlight
    By yurimaster2010 in forum Clothing & Footwear
    Replies: 0
    : 12-27-2011, 10:58 AM
  2. My Review: Apacs Superlight vs. Karakal M-Tec 70 Gel Iso
    By angeleyes1c13 in forum Badminton Rackets / Equipment
    Replies: 1
    : 12-08-2009, 02:19 PM
  3. Karakal M-Tec 70 & Karakal Accessories [Review]
    By MrChrisBT in forum Badminton Rackets / Equipment
    Replies: 7
    : 04-02-2009, 11:59 AM
  4. Karakal SL 70 Vs Ashaway Superlight
    By sohel in forum Racket Recommendation / Comparison
    Replies: 11
    : 10-03-2007, 08:04 PM
  5. ashaway superlight or karakal sl-70
    By Singhy94 in forum Racket Recommendation / Comparison
    Replies: 1
    : 08-28-2007, 06:39 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •