Results 69 to 85 of 116
12-21-2009, 07:02 PM #69
i think the designs look great so far though honestly i'm not a big fan of model numbers (Urumi 400 & Kanobo 400).
this may seem like a dumb question, but where does the customization come in?
12-21-2009, 07:20 PM #70
Not sure it does at the moment. Manufacturer is not keen on the idea, so I'm looking into doing a small run. At this stage though I'm just going to do 4 samples with different specs to see how the quality is and see what the different materials are like.
12-21-2009, 07:40 PM #71
i have to agree. too much customization implies added effort and cost. not to mention difficulty in moderating quality as well.
maybe try to keep customization to a minimum? lets say just a part on the shaft where buyers can put in their names, initials or wtv?
if it fails, just make it into your own brand like panda power and zelm which have both done considerably well.
12-21-2009, 09:38 PM #72
12-22-2009, 02:17 AM #73
Yeah nobody would have a headshape like that. It would be a great design job though, I'd love to design a full racket from the ground up.
Not sure about grommet-less design though. I'd think that grommets assist with damping to a degree. Does anyone make a grommet-less racket?
12-22-2009, 02:35 AM #74
12-22-2009, 02:36 AM #75
12-22-2009, 02:43 AM #76
Yeah, but the Princes' kinda suck.
I have been doing some research on tetra-axial fabrics since they were first mentioned on the TC series Mizunos. As strength-to-weight is not really an issue with badminton rackets, I see TA fabrics main advantage in a torsional resistance roll, of which they would be better than 2k weave.
Not sure if either are better than filament wound structures though.
12-22-2009, 02:47 AM #77
what is the point of customization without daring to go outside the box? dicking around BP, stiffness and color is elementary. I have done it before, taneepak and others have done it before, for very low extra cost.
Last edited by cooler; 12-22-2009 at 02:55 AM.
12-22-2009, 03:32 AM #78
I've played with the O2, didn't like it at all, and yeah, it's not flying off the shelf.
I know as a product designer how transitions and physical barriers between materials effect vibration transmission, so I see grommets as a good thing, not a bad one.
Don't worry, I'll 'dick around' heaps. That's about all I can guarantee.
12-22-2009, 03:48 AM #79
I don't think there's a racquet that is entirely grommetless, usually it is only a certain section.
Other than prince and Li ning, the Babolat X-Feel series are also grommetless on some section.
12-22-2009, 06:35 AM #80
12-22-2009, 06:42 AM #81
O3 speedport is really a super-sized stringholes.. Before launching these Prince used grommet-less designs on normal size string holes on their Y-shaped prince More and more+ racket ranges.. The direct string contact is really good imop.. But it is of course more complicated to produce racket if they need to be molded or use two halfs (as in the prince case) than to simply drill holse in the frame...
BTW i didn't like the first O3s either (I bought the White, Silver, blue and red :-) ) ..
Last edited by twobeer; 12-22-2009 at 06:45 AM.
12-22-2009, 01:16 PM #82
12-22-2009, 02:33 PM #83
Yeah sorry, I keep calling the O3 the O2 for some reason. Not sure what the new versions are like, but for this exercise it's a bit pointless because nobody - myself included - is going to pony up 5-1O grand for a custom mould.
12-30-2009, 05:11 AM #84
12-30-2009, 02:09 PM #85
Hard to decipher what "Badminton***" is supposed to mean.
By adonis in forum Market PlaceReplies: 28: 06-08-2010, 04:29 AM
By Xhan_ in forum Badminton Rackets / EquipmentReplies: 5: 06-23-2009, 03:54 PM
By Easy Tiger in forum Badminton Rackets / EquipmentReplies: 26: 11-28-2008, 03:42 PM
By Sgbad in forum Badminton Rackets / EquipmentReplies: 19: 09-29-2007, 10:54 AM
By Byro-Nenium in forum Market PlaceReplies: 15: 07-18-2001, 10:51 PM