User Tag List

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 17 of 25
  1. #1
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    singapore
    Posts
    128
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Stances when defending smashes in doubles.

    When defending smashes in singles, I stand with my racket foot out and it is simple and easy. But for doubles my coach teaches me to stand with my non-racket leg out and just a thumb backhand grip all the way. When the opponent smashes im supposed to move in with my racket leg and just block the shuttle. Seems rather easy in training but during a real match I somehow revert back to my normal way and stand with my racket leg out. This is quite good as I'm able to drive back smashes but the weakness of this is the opponent doing cross court smashes into my forehand. How do you guys stand?

  2. #2
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    melbourne
    Posts
    20
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    never stay in one grip, u might need your forehand to defend as will

  3. #3
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    goa
    Posts
    99
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    body weight should be on non racket foot, so it acts as a pivot for your defensive blocks and drives.

    this way you can also use your nonracket foot to push off forward/backward in case the opponent fast drops or punch clear.

  4. #4
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Campbell, California, United S
    Posts
    496
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    to hit a smash i have 2 ways. 1 is to regularly block with my feet parallel with my racket at my side for forehand or back hand block. The other is to attack the smash by running at it and getting under it to drive it back or even drop it.

  5. #5
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    2,876
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I also have my right foot a bit on the front (Im a right handed). At the moment I dont have problem with returning smash using thumb grip and backhand stroke, but I found it a bit of problem when the smash directed to my forehand area and therefore what i did so far is to stand a little bit to the right when defending smashes.

    But yeah I think I will try to have my left foot a bit to the front and see if thats better.

  6. #6
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    81
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    They way you guys describe how you are picking smashes, one good smash in your forehand seems like it would give you immense trouble but I'm probably not picturing your stances probably from your descriptions.

    Personally I'm standing with both feets parallel and the racket in a front of me, so that it is pointing towards the net, grip being something inbetween the forehand and backhand grip (thumb on one of the sides) so that I can change between the two fast depending on where the smash is.

  7. #7
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    singapore
    Posts
    128
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    i personally feel that standing with the racket foot out would give you the forehand or backhand advantage if you would want to attack the smash. However for full defense I think maybe the non-racket foot would be better. Havent really tried this out properly yet in a game though. =(

  8. #8
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    971
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    both feet parallel is definitely the best when you're defending from your base position...:P

  9. #9
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    singapore
    Posts
    128
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    parallel? As in square position with neither foot infront of the other?

  10. #10
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    2,876
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    After a brief trial with left foot a bit on the front, here's what i find:
    1. clearly my back hand smash return and backhand attacking drive when returning smash is not as good as when i normally stand with my right foot to the front
    2. forehand smash return is easier
    3. overall coverage area is a lot less

    on parallel position: its a very nice position covering both side area, but lacking in foward (receiving drop shot) and back movement.

    Conclusion, I will stick with my right foot a bit to the front or on a parallel position. This position gives me a lot space coverage. Using backhand to return smash is the way to go for me.

  11. #11
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    manila
    Posts
    1,117
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    As I've noticed with the top double players, their feet are usually parallel, with their body facing the smasher. That means they're not parallel to the net. Thus, sometimes, their right foot is more forward, and sometimes, their left foot is more forward. It depends on where the shot is coming from. Their knees are also bent and their weight is slightly leaning forward.

    Try observing videos from them. They're synchronized in changing their stance.

    As with the grip, I think the best way to hold your racket is with a bevel grip. This way, you can switch easily to backhand and forehand. Try also not to be committed with only one side. This is what Gil Clark usually observes. Although with a backhand is the best way to defend, staying committed on the backhand side will make it awkaward for you to hit shots directed towards your right. Your racket head should be facing away from you.

  12. #12
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    81
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Crimz View Post
    parallel? As in square position with neither foot infront of the other?
    Yes, if anything the racketfoot can be 5 cm in front of the other.

    Regarding the positions weakness in getting to the net, it is no different than any other time you want to go to the net - only difference is that you might be standing a bit further back, but hey - grow a bigger quadriceps

    The reason for standing with parallel feet is that it gives you the biggest covering area. If you at the same time place you racket with a bevel grip pointing towards the net, so that when you look down at it, you can't see the strings, you won't be comitted to either forehand or backhand before you can see where that shuttle is headed.

  13. #13
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    2,876
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Trmun View Post
    Yes, if anything the racketfoot can be 5 cm in front of the other.

    Regarding the positions weakness in getting to the net, it is no different than any other time you want to go to the net - only difference is that you might be standing a bit further back, but hey - grow a bigger quadriceps

    The reason for standing with parallel feet is that it gives you the biggest covering area. If you at the same time place you racket with a bevel grip pointing towards the net, so that when you look down at it, you can't see the strings, you won't be comitted to either forehand or backhand before you can see where that shuttle is headed.
    I wish i can grow quadriceps that quick. For those who cant, will find it acceleration to the net is faster with one leg on the front. So i find it a more convinience solution for me

    As for the grip, why bavel grip when you know that the backhand can cover 80% or more of the area to return smash. I just pick a random short video from youtube, why dont you guys check it out:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iYyJ_vPDAcI

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RZ2k-tsX5KE&feature=fvw

    It runs for 3 and a half minutes and you may surprise how many of the smash were returned by forehand stroke. On my count it was not more than 5, and the rest were return by backhand stroke

    Also notice that the leg are rarely parallel, depending on where the bird is they move one or the other foward.

  14. #14
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    81
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    The reason behind the grip is that any good player will notice if you continually just use your backhand and he'll then place the shuttle in a position where you can't take it with a backhand. This way you might still be taking it 80% of the time with your backhand, but you are still ready for that forehand.

    Regarding the footwork - the feet of the direct reciever are parallel, at least in the second link (was the only one I looked through). The cross-reciever has obviously turned a bit so that he faces the smasher more than the net, which is pretty common - just like he has pulled a bit into the middle of the court so that he covers more of the middle.

    I was merely talking about the situation where you are the direct reciever which I believe is the situation described by the OP.

  15. #15
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    2,876
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Im not saying that i will use my backhand all the time to return smash. But in comparison, I would not sacrifice/trade the time to change from thumb grip to forehand grip with anything alse. If I have to use bavel grip that means i have to change grip all the time, right? (either to thumb grip or forehand grip)

    In real time situation, I would have to change grip for only 20% of the time. Compare that with bavel grip, 100%.

  16. #16
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    81
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Difference being, you won't have time to change to the forehand grip from the backhand grip. So when you have to let every 5th smash go into the ground (or pick it up so late that you'll get molested on the next) I will return it.

  17. #17
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    2,876
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Isn't that (the 20% rating) your rate that you will not be able to return your opponent's smash anyway?? Ofcourse depending on what level you are up againts

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Defending Smashes - Forehand push or drive
    By tigerlam92 in forum Techniques / Training
    Replies: 0
    : 10-10-2011, 07:51 PM
  2. Defending smashes
    By staiger in forum Techniques / Training
    Replies: 22
    : 10-08-2011, 01:05 PM
  3. Defending smashes - Part 2
    By staiger in forum Techniques / Training
    Replies: 5
    : 07-28-2011, 05:51 PM
  4. Defending Smashes down the Line
    By Ambushes in forum Techniques / Training
    Replies: 12
    : 04-13-2011, 03:20 AM
  5. Trouble with defending smashes
    By joshua.bay in forum Techniques / Training
    Replies: 11
    : 05-08-2006, 05:14 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •