Results 1 to 17 of 18
Thread: Mizuno Tetracross 400
02-01-2010, 08:16 AM #1
Mizuno Tetracross 400
Mizuno Tetracross 400 3UG5. Pictures also taken with the Luminasonic 9 and the Tetracross 700 in comparison.
Weight strung without grip: 93g
02-01-2010, 08:21 AM #2
The finishing on the TC400 seems to be very good
02-01-2010, 08:27 AM #3
Yes it is. Compared to the TC700 the frame is thicker and it looks and feels more head heavy than the TC700. The LS9 feels about the same as the TC400. Both the TC400 and LS9 are Isometric frames whereas the TC700 is Optometric frame.
02-01-2010, 08:39 AM #4
WOW... a good collection ara...
02-01-2010, 08:42 AM #5
nice pics, would you say you're more of a collector or a player?
02-01-2010, 08:44 AM #6
02-01-2010, 08:49 AM #7
you need to do a quarterly update on your list of racquets for us.
doing an annual review is probably overkill for the rest of us, but your collection would have grown too much by then.
02-01-2010, 08:51 AM #8
02-01-2010, 08:53 AM #9
I just gave away 2 racquets today that were not suitable for me. So there is a renewal process.
02-01-2010, 09:30 AM #10
Any good reviews how this rackets perform?
02-01-2010, 09:52 AM #11
now you already get another poison from him.....is only a time before you have racket as many as him hahahahaha...nice collection bro
02-01-2010, 09:55 AM #12
02-01-2010, 03:47 PM #13
Also, the TC 700 that you have is 3UG4 and the TC 400 is a 3UG5 so the bigger grip size of the TC 700 may make it feel less head heavy.
I'm really curious about the TC 400, and I like the design a lot. Would be nice to know how it compares to the 700 and 500.
02-01-2010, 04:35 PM #14
TC400 looks nice :-)
How flexy is the 400 shaft compared to 700?
02-01-2010, 06:09 PM #15
Nice pics, and great collection!
I just received my L9 this past week, and the frame has a pretty sharp profile and a much wider cross section than the TC700's. Judging from the pics, it looks like the TC400 has a wider cross section than the TC700's, but is still narrower than the L9's. So does that mean its profile is sharper than the TC700's, but still a bit more dull than the L9's?
I eagerly await for a review/comparison of this racket. =)
02-01-2010, 10:36 PM #16
To: bad fanatic
Don't own a TC500 and don't think I am going to get it. The reason I got the 400 is because it is highly recommended from my trusted source. The L7 is another racket which is recommended also.
Last edited by aramistuscany; 02-01-2010 at 10:43 PM.
02-02-2010, 11:58 AM #17
where is it possible to buy this racket in Europe?
By memo1820 in forum Buy & SellReplies: 1: 11-16-2011, 02:08 PM
By memo1820 in forum Buy & SellReplies: 0: 11-05-2011, 05:29 PM
By yurimaster2010 in forum Racket Recommendation / ComparisonReplies: 7: 12-20-2010, 03:58 PM
By Jeff_SUN in forum Buy & SellReplies: 24: 04-15-2008, 08:10 AM
By michaelcool in forum Badminton Rackets / EquipmentReplies: 5: 03-21-2007, 04:22 PM