Results 1 to 17 of 171
Thread: Adding one extra cross string
02-10-2010, 07:02 PM #1
Adding one extra cross string
I have been analysing our Alan Kakinami's technique of adding one extra cross string at bottom 8, which he says gives an overall stiffer feel for the whole string bed.
I'm thinking of this as I have been using tensions of 30lbs plus sometime ago but then dropped down to 27-28lbs to protect my racquets but recently felt that I'm not able to get enough feel and repulsion from the string bed to my satisfactory as I could when I used 30lbs plus. I recently also cut the strings on my AT900P and found that one grommet at the bottom has sunk in very slightly, and that racquet had only been strung to 28lbs tension once, ever since I bought it brand new (I wouldn't want to think what 30lbs would do to it lol). One of my friends advised me that for his case, he would actually rather risk racquet damage then to limit himself to playing less tension that he is used to (which is about 30-32lbs plus), but I think that is a bit extreme.
So the important thing that I want to inquire here is, if I add an extra cross at bottom 8, will the grommet there (which may not exactly be designed for shared strings, from my humble experience) be able to withstand both the lateral and horizontal (meaning both way) tension stress of the stringing?
I also propose to tie the main tie offs at bottom 7 rather than tie them at bottom 9 or bottom 8. What do you more experienced stringers think?
02-10-2010, 08:36 PM #2
armortec is not that durable especially in the lower main area as you've mentioned. forcing open B8 (sharing M and C strings) will only facilitate more sinking of the grommets and lead to the death of your racket =(
Solution. Instead you can put small peices of credit/gift cards under and between grommets it'll prevent sinking
02-10-2010, 08:55 PM #3
Yonex has already introduced the new long muscle power strip style grommets to counter the sinking grommets at those areas for at least 28lbs tension (which is the new tension warranty limit), so I won't have worries using the grommets and stringing up to 28lbs without using the hard plastic protection you suggested. I'm actually planning to string my racquets to 28lbs and yet get the stiffness that I like of 30lbs plus
But the important thing is that will force opening the grommet at bottom 8 be advisable? For my AT900P the bottom 8 is pretty much like new and unharmed like the others.
02-10-2010, 09:42 PM #4
The number of crosses and their placement can be varied but not the mains.
In principle strings, in the number of strings and in their diameter, will affect air resistance.
As the top of the racquet frame has the greatest velocity air resistance from strings at this location is not as serious as it is at or near the T-joint or towards the throat. The greatest impediment to racquet speed is here-hence the need to have as slim a T-joint and frame cross-section, without sacrificing mechanical strength, rigidity and stabilty, as possible.
As the player has no say in the T-joint or X-section profile there is not much he can do about it except to buy top end racquets.
However, every player can play around with the stringing pattern. It is here that the choice of a thin string, compatible with your affordabilty for more frequent restring, and the omission of at least one cross string at the throat end, can pay big dividends in the form of reduced air resistance.
For racquets that require 22 cross strings, reduce this to 21 strings. The first cross string should be across grommet #7 at the top. The last cross string at the bottom should be across grommets #9, not 8. The further you go down towards the throat the greater the air resistance, and grommets #9 is the lowest you should go. Skip grommets #10 and go to grommets #11 at the throat end. Of course it would in principle be even faster if you skipped grommets #9 and #10, but you need the last cross string at grommets #9 to minimize mishits that will easily snap the string.
For racquets that require 21 cross strings, you reduce this to 20 strings with the bottom cross string across grommets# 9 leaving grommets #10 empty.
The above will reduce air resistance at a critical location and will result in increased speed and power.
Contrary to what others say, having more cross strings further down the throat will not improve playability. It will only have added air resistance.
02-10-2010, 10:31 PM #5
Do you think this will have consequence on the grommets at the top or the tension stress distribution on the racquet frame, taneepak?
02-10-2010, 11:32 PM #6
If you use a real starting knot stringing the cross from the top, it will make the stringbed stiffer than using a double half hitch knot. Increasing the cross tension 10% or slightly more in a dynamic sequence for the first 11 top cross strings will stiffen the stringbed more effectively.
In my opinion, starting the crosses from the bottom, as recommended by racquet manufacturers, is inferior to starting from the top. The trade-off in starting from the top is an increased risk of frame breakage during high tension stringing by inexperienced stringers. It is understandable why manufacturers opt for the safer pattern.
02-11-2010, 12:00 AM #7
02-11-2010, 12:04 AM #8
02-11-2010, 12:36 AM #9
02-11-2010, 12:38 AM #10
here are some discussions
2 missing bottom cross http://www.badmintonforum.com/vb/sho...hlight=missing
1 missing bottom cross http://www.badmintonforum.com/vb/sho...hlight=missing
1 extra bottom cross http://www.badmintoncentral.com/foru...ghlight=bottom
Last edited by cooler; 02-11-2010 at 12:52 AM.
02-11-2010, 12:45 AM #11
02-11-2010, 01:30 AM #12
02-11-2010, 05:01 AM #13
My Z slash was recently restrung and the stringer put an extra string on the 8 cross. I don't like it at all. IMHO it takes the 'trampoline' effect from the mains and your smash is slower. I prefer the standard Yonex setup by far. I believe that their pattern allows for a variety of shots, whereas stringing the 8 hole limits the repetory of the racquet.
02-11-2010, 06:23 AM #14
Perhaps you can explain how it can be done.
02-11-2010, 09:05 AM #15
2) The major top string tension loss during the tie off is after you clamp the final top, the small piece of string fron the clamp to tie off knot is untensioned (I hope you know that already). To min that tension loss, you can a) top down so the tension loss is on the throat end. b) Tension the string through tie off grommet. Stick a awl in to stop the string from slipping out. Release tension head and tie off. I know you feel awl should not be used in any situation. However, this is necessary evil. Give it a try, it does work.
For Blitzzards' original question, Master Cooler is right. However, I just want to add 1 more point. You can not add additional string on B8 using 2 pieces method without become creative on the tie off because on the new YY racquet, B7 is a single pass grommet. If you tie off on the B7, it will damage the grommet or may be the racquet.
02-11-2010, 10:09 AM #16
Stringing the crosses from the top down will always give a tighter upper stringbed than stringing the crosses from the bottom up.
The main purpose of stringing the crosses from the top is not to minimize breakage from mishits. As a matter of fact, AOTBE, stringing the crosses from the top down will always have a higher tendency to have the top cross string snap from mishit than stringing the crosses from the bottom up at high tensions.
Using an awl to stick into the grommet at very high tension is suicidal. I am shocked by this silly suggestion. At very high tensions the heat generated by the awl when it is inserted into the grommet after the last cross is strung will snap the string. You are playing with fire with your string.
You can actually test this with two identical racquets /strings/tensions.
02-11-2010, 10:24 AM #17
Please stop redirect issues. Stringing from top down will prevent string breaking on the main on the top. Also, unless you have a post grad degree in mechanical engineering or related engineering degree, you still don't know a lot. we are not talking about high tension here. Never did. You ask how it can be done, I am telling you how it is done. I never said you will like it nor I say it has to be done this way. If you have nothing right to say, just read. you might learn something.
By asmd6230 in forum Badminton Stringing Techniques & ToolsReplies: 3: 11-15-2011, 04:22 PM
By nutbad5981 in forum Badminton Stringing Techniques & ToolsReplies: 6: 02-24-2010, 12:37 AM
By takumifujiwara in forum Badminton Stringing Techniques & ToolsReplies: 18: 03-15-2009, 01:02 AM
By lostatse in forum Badminton Stringing Techniques & ToolsReplies: 5: 05-12-2008, 07:45 AM
By boilermaker in forum General ForumReplies: 0: 01-14-2003, 03:57 AM