User Tag List

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 17 of 43
  1. #1
    New Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    1
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default New service rule?

    Hi all.

    In Denmark there is an unconfirmed rumor going on, a new service rule;

    On service (shuttle hit), the racket head must not be any higher than 120 cm from the ground.
    No matter the size you are.

    A red line across the net at the height off 120 cm from the ground, shall help being a guideline.

    Can anyone (un)confirm this?

    Best regards

  2. #2
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    beautiful place
    Posts
    213
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    does that rule only apply to denmark leagues?
    as far as i know,bwf, hasn't revealed any new amendments to the current service rule.

  3. #3
    Regular Member visor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    9,217
    Mentioned
    97 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Probably only applies to Denmark, because they have some of the tallest badminton players in the world, especially as compared to Asia.

  4. #4
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    3,989
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    maybe they have peaked at my suggestions on BC

    http://www.badmintoncentral.com/foru...service&page=2

    /T

  5. #5
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Catania, Italy
    Posts
    18
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    This rumors seems to be confirmed here in Italy: the service has to be executed not higher than 1.10 mt from the ground (it's 1.10 and not 1.20).

    It's some sort of experiment for this year (2010): in december someone will decide about preserving this rule or not.

    I'm sure of that because i'm a referee (and a player too xD) and i received a notification of this changing from the italian federation ^_^

  6. #6
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    2,272
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    That makes no sense if you are a short player...and no sense if you're really tall too.

    Why make a silly rule like that when the height of a badminton player is like 175cm +/- 25 cm?

  7. #7
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    3,989
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Athelete1234 View Post
    That makes no sense if you are a short player...and no sense if you're really tall too.

    Why make a silly rule like that when the height of a badminton player is like 175cm +/- 25 cm?
    Because 50cm is a huge difference in serve-height???

    Or maybe because it is quite hard to officiate and see the "waist" or "lower rib" under the shirts..

    The silly rule is really to base serve on player height.. Should we allow bigger rackets for bigger players as well :-P

    /T

  8. #8
    Regular Member visor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    9,217
    Mentioned
    97 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    I suppose by having this rule will help make the service judge's job to be less subjective (in trying to determine someone's "waist line") and more objective (by placing a horizontal "service" line on the net that will be applied to all players regardless of waist height).

  9. #9
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    CA, USA
    Posts
    135
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I think this rule would discriminate against "short" people, if you get what I mean. I've seen one "short" person play baddy a while ago, and although he wasn't tall, he played extremely well for his height. He was probably around 4 or 3.5ft...not sure. I'd feel kind of messed up going up to him with a measuring tape ><

  10. #10
    Regular Member visor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    9,217
    Mentioned
    97 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    ^^
    Actually on the contrary, IMHO, this new rule would "discriminate" against taller players!

    And the flip side is that it allows shorter players to serve higher than their waist(!) as long as it is under the 1.1 or 1.2m rule, thus allowing them to serve on equal footing with taller players.
    Last edited by visor; 02-21-2010 at 07:59 PM.

  11. #11
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    CA, USA
    Posts
    135
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Oh shooot. i misread. I thought it said it minimum height was 1.1m/1.2m. but then again, that wouldn't make sense...@_@

  12. #12
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    454
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Lol?, should be more of a problem in doubles I guess xD

  13. #13
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Catania, Italy
    Posts
    18
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by visor View Post
    ^^
    Actually on the contrary, IMHO, this new rule would "discriminate" against taller players!

    And the flip side is that it allows shorter players to serve higher than their waist(!) as long as it is under the 1.1 or 1.2m rule, thus allowing them to serve on equal footing with taller players.
    I totally agree
    It isn't discrimination but equality IMHO, such a rule will make things a lot easier for almost everyone, from the players to the service judge.
    Moreover, now short and tall people will serve at the same height and that sounds right to me ^^

  14. #14
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    2,876
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I would agree only if this rule applies as a companion to the old rule.

    A serve must still be executed below (or at) waist level (regardless if the waist level is lower than 120 cm). For example if a short player has a waist level at 110cm, then this is the highest he/she can go for. I believe a serve above waist level will give the serve an advantage of a quick flick serve.

    A taller player must also server at waist level, however if his/her waist level is higher than 120cm than the server must be lowered at 120cm max. I imagine a serve at a higher position gives the serve an advantage of a flat drive serve which is practically saver from opponent's attack.
    Last edited by Yoppy; 02-22-2010 at 04:36 AM.

  15. #15
    Regular Member visor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    9,217
    Mentioned
    97 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    ^^
    How about below 120cm or waist level, whichever is lower?
    Would be less complicated...

  16. #16
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    2,876
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default



    yes correct

  17. #17
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Hong Kong
    Posts
    6,527
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Maybe the Danes are thinking far into the future when players wil average 7 to 8 feet tall. Then this new rule makes more sense than the old below the waist rule.

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Change the service rule
    By H8work in forum Rules / Tournament Regulation / Officiating
    Replies: 1
    : 03-17-2012, 01:03 PM
  2. Service Rule
    By idontknow017 in forum Rules / Tournament Regulation / Officiating
    Replies: 4
    : 06-16-2010, 02:23 PM
  3. Service Rule Enquiry
    By pinkduck in forum Rules / Tournament Regulation / Officiating
    Replies: 2
    : 10-17-2007, 07:30 AM
  4. Question regarding service rule
    By goodbug in forum Techniques / Training
    Replies: 5
    : 03-25-2007, 04:41 PM
  5. return of service rule
    By chris in forum General Forum
    Replies: 3
    : 04-30-2001, 10:25 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •