User Tag List

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 17 of 24
  1. #1
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    London
    Posts
    573
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Yonex Ti10 Questions

    I have a couple of Ti-10 questions and would appreciate any help:

    I'm thinking of buying some more Gen 3 Ti-10s, but will hold off if Yonex are going to bring out new ones soon. Does anyone know if they are planning one and if so, any information on it?

    Second, I'm thinking about trying a Li-Ning equivalent as these seem pretty popular too these days. Does anyone know which Li-Ning racket is closest to the Ti-10?

    Thanks for your help


  2. #2
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    indonesia
    Posts
    10
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    never heard that ti10 are going to bring out new ones.

    li ning n50 is the more like ti10 gen2 because it's design according to FHF recommendation
    FHF used ti10 gen2 before he change to lining

  3. #3
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    HCMC of Vietnam
    Posts
    53
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    NS9900 might be like Ti10 as KKK and TBH moved from Ti10s to NS9900

  4. #4
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    vancouver
    Posts
    625
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Ti10 may not be producing a "4th" gen theres no confirmation, just that i remember reading from another post someone said along the line of "Yonex should make a 4th gen because the 3rd gen has been out for 2 years now"

    N55 isnt honestly worth the extra money especially theres a lack of people using/reviewing it on BC

    i know ns9000s/x feel slightly lighter than the ti10-3rd

  5. #5
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    London
    Posts
    573
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    hhmmmm....a couple of team mates have recently switched to the NS9900 and they used the Ti-10 before.

    I just thought the NS9900 had a less stiff shaft than the Ti-10 so would feel different.

    I guess I will have to try it out.

  6. #6
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    HCMC of Vietnam
    Posts
    53
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    NS9900s are a bit stiffer than Ti10s, I think.

  7. #7
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    indonesia
    Posts
    10
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by andersen View Post
    NS9900s are a bit stiffer than Ti10s, I think.
    but ns9900 are more lightweigth than ti10. my friend has it and more light than my ti10

  8. #8
    Regular Member ryim_'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Hong Kong SAR, China
    Posts
    1,722
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hofungsan View Post
    but ns9900 are more lightweigth than ti10. my friend has it and more light than my ti10
    having tried both, i do prefer the ti-10 over the ns9900. for one, its considerably less expensive. in hk prices, the ti-10 is about 75% of the price of a ns9900.

  9. #9
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    106
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    yah I'm pretty sure ns9900 is headlight (haven't personally tried it.. but that's what they say)

    you should search under the ti-10 posts... any of those ti-10 fanatics will tell you all the specific details about each ti-10 gen and possible replacements

  10. #10
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    indonesia
    Posts
    10
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ryim_ View Post
    having tried both, i do prefer the ti-10 over the ns9900. for one, its considerably less expensive. in hk prices, the ti-10 is about 75% of the price of a ns9900.
    yes!! in indonesia ti 10 are cost arround us$90-99 an much more cheaper than ns9900

    Quote Originally Posted by Winn108 View Post
    yah I'm pretty sure ns9900 is headlight (haven't personally tried it.. but that's what they say)

    you should search under the ti-10 posts... any of those ti-10 fanatics will tell you all the specific details about each ti-10 gen and possible replacements
    for your consideration i'm not a ti10 fanatics or any brand
    my main raket is victor bs 11 and my second racket is ti 10 gen 3

  11. #11
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    garden grove
    Posts
    415
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I don't know which gen of the ti10 my friend has, but I do not like it at all. Maybe it is a little bit heavy for me.
    However, if all gen of the ti10 balance is the same.
    If i'm not wrong the ti10 is balance weight compare to ns9900 (which i have) is head light. They're really different from each other.

    I don't like both of them, because my main one is armortec 900 t

  12. #12
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    HCMC of Vietnam
    Posts
    53
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hofungsan View Post
    but ns9900 are more lightweigth than ti10. my friend has it and more light than my ti10
    I agree that NS9900's head is lighter than Ti10's. In term of holding a racket, I feel that Arc-Z is closer to Ti10 than NS9900 or AT900T. However, as Arc-Z's head is oval, I still prefer Ti10 which is in my opinion right balanced in term of control vs offense while Arc-Z is also great but requires more steadiness. I've been looking for another YY racket as a backup for the Ti10 (1st gen 2U) but couldn't find any and always ended up with another 1st gen 2U Ti10 at a premium price.

  13. #13
    Regular Member ryim_'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Hong Kong SAR, China
    Posts
    1,722
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by andersen View Post
    I agree that NS9900's head is lighter than Ti10's. In term of holding a racket, I feel that Arc-Z is closer to Ti10 than NS9900 or AT900T. However, as Arc-Z's head is oval, I still prefer Ti10 which is in my opinion right balanced in term of control vs offense while Arc-Z is also great but requires more steadiness. I've been looking for another YY racket as a backup for the Ti10 (1st gen 2U) but couldn't find any and always ended up with another 1st gen 2U Ti10 at a premium price.
    oval?!?!?! its a new frame shape but its definitely not oval.

  14. #14
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    HCMC of Vietnam
    Posts
    53
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ryim_ View Post
    oval?!?!?! its a new frame shape but its definitely not oval.
    I'm not sure if oval is the correct word to use but Arc-Z's head shape is different from Ti10's.

  15. #15
    Regular Member ryim_'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Hong Kong SAR, China
    Posts
    1,722
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by andersen View Post
    I'm not sure if oval is the correct word to use but Arc-Z's head shape is different from Ti10's.
    its a slightly modified isometric (narrower) but definitely not oval while the ti-10 is a conventional isometric.

  16. #16
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    HCMC of Vietnam
    Posts
    53
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ryim_ View Post
    its a slightly modified isometric (narrower) but definitely not oval while the ti-10 is a conventional isometric.
    Yeah, you're right. Many thanks.

  17. #17
    Regular Member tckang's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Boleh-Land
    Posts
    733
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ryim_ View Post
    its a slightly modified isometric (narrower) but definitely not oval while the ti-10 is a conventional isometric.
    In layman term, Yonex "married" ISO with Oval and the "Pariah" offspring is the "ISO-OVAL" Arc Z, but joke aside it works wonders!

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Yonex Carbonex 20, 21 Questions
    By Loafers in forum Racket Recommendation / Comparison
    Replies: 20
    : 11-27-2009, 12:43 PM
  2. FS: Yonex Armortec 800 offensive 3UG4 & Yonex Ti10 (3rd generation) 3UG5
    By b_joey in forum Buy & Sell - Read the rules sticky before you post
    Replies: 20
    : 09-18-2008, 08:28 PM
  3. Yonex Website Goof!...and other questions.
    By Midget_Boy in forum Badminton Rackets / Equipment
    Replies: 6
    : 07-17-2007, 03:10 PM
  4. Got a ti10 as gift, some questions
    By hellspar3 in forum Badminton Rackets / Equipment
    Replies: 13
    : 06-24-2007, 11:51 AM
  5. questions about strings for ti10, mp100
    By cwlan in forum Badminton String
    Replies: 10
    : 05-27-2002, 05:42 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •