Results 188 to 204 of 575
Thread: BAM news
06-02-2010, 02:13 AM #188
i really dont know what privilege group means.. i worked hard for everything i got today. including degree, everyting... i resent being lumped as a group that is lazy and ignorant.. my grandparents worked hard more than 12 hours a day.. my parents worked several jobs to sent me to school, you dare call them lazy? .. please stop labelling a whole group people.as being whatever your stereotyped mines has set to. We are talking about badminton here if you want to talk about racism or government policies .. go somewhere else ok
06-02-2010, 05:44 AM #189
Frankly said, every race throughout the world has good and bad guys, no1 should deny this. In MAS, so does the privilege and non-privilege group. So i'm not bringing in any political issue here. I also not questioning about out country setup so-called perlembagaan, whereby the country constitution was built-up during the formation of MAS.
I just feel that somehow the BAM management still living in the past, whereby organization outside MAS is already heading towards merit system, whereby there is no-longer privilege, all treated as 1 family, same citizen, and whoever score higher get it. That's it...
pity me, suddenly kena bazuka boom...
06-02-2010, 06:22 AM #190
06-02-2010, 06:43 AM #191
if u can avoid a punishment and still get send to tournament
is that not a privilege?
if u are not in form,having injury,but u still used up all the resources(coach,fund,etc)
is that not a privilege(not mentioning fuzzy)
06-02-2010, 10:11 PM #192
Instead of having unclear policies which also work the same way, its better to has a black & white thingy...
06-02-2010, 10:37 PM #193
06-02-2010, 11:13 PM #194
Maybe a change in coaches will bring some welcome improvements. Contrary to what you are implying, I feel that the "injured" player's inclusion was the decision of all the coaches and not from the BAM council.
Also this is a misuse of the word privilege. A privilege is a specified special right. This is not. It is romour mongering.
Badminton has a different objective: to win honours for the country. To do this they select the best combination team to achieve an objective. To say that the team is chosen with one race being given special privileges at the discretion of the boss or the council is insulting to the intelligence of any Malaysian. Although the internet is a free-for-all writing board or punching bag, depending on what you choose, may I remind you that a person's inner self and character is revealed by his writings expressed.
06-03-2010, 12:41 AM #195
i dont want to say much on ur concept
the only thing i will want to inform u:none of the coaches have the final say in bam,except for the likes like misbun and rashid
this is a nonsense as well
if they are to win honours for the country
THEY will not choose fairuz/zakry who are not even in top four of our men double department
if fairuz/zakry is the 2nd or 3rd pair in bam like 2 year ago,no one will question that
06-03-2010, 12:44 AM #196
Comment: Three up for new secretary
06-03-2010, 01:05 AM #197
06-03-2010, 01:15 AM #198
Officially your no 1 point include all coaches, BAM President make press statement that coach dont make final decision on player selection, but BAM Coaching & Training Committee (BAM Council) . NSC Director can even instruct coach to focus more on such & such a pair, he was quoted saying so in press statement.
Your pt no 2, in 2008 Fuzzy was only the reserve pair, uncles CTF/LWW, KKK/TBH were the main pairs, by merit. The youngsters too raw. Mak/Teo havent even won WJC yet then. This time around, it's not logic (by merit) at all they chose Fuzzy considering their poor form.
06-03-2010, 01:30 AM #199
overall, selection of fuzzy pair to TC 2010 just not reasonable...as there are too many pair steps ahead them this time. Even simulation match also a prove, but still nid Rexy's help to "explain" to media, and convince MAS fans that they are capable... zzz
06-03-2010, 01:44 AM #200
On no 2, there are many examples of what happened to other Msia MD pairs when they DONT show much result, read the relevant threads sure will know.
Last edited by eaglehelang; 06-03-2010 at 01:52 AM.
06-03-2010, 01:59 AM #201
06-03-2010, 02:17 AM #202
Don't want to comment on the secretary thing.
As for Fuzzy etc., I think the backups are not a mile ahead of them yet. The backups have to perform MUCH better in order to get selected. As for talking about who lost to who, even KKK/TBH lost to Fuzzy before, so, they can use this reason to show why they chose Fuzzy instead of Mak/Tan, Chan/Lim or Hoon/Ong (Although we know that the Fuzzy now is worse than all three of the other pairs). Hoon/Ong getting more chances now though, and that's a first step but their careers are already past the halfway mark.
06-03-2010, 03:37 AM #203
2nd,yup,they are the 3rd pair
in 2008 only
they beat koo/tan
when is the last time?
they didnt win any matches in 2010!
06-03-2010, 05:11 AM #204
i am with everybody else.. i dont like the fact that the fuzzy pair is being favored over other seemingly better pair. if they still get chosen and still keep losing.. i wonder if bam can be held accountable for their choice. and answer to fans...
By emms626 in forum China Professional PlayersReplies: 42: 10-02-2006, 09:24 AM
By Gre8Deal in forum Market PlaceReplies: 2: 02-07-2006, 03:49 AM
By Chesire Cat in forum Chinese Taipei Open / Hong Kong Open / Indonesia Open 2004Replies: 15: 11-23-2004, 12:16 AM
By bluejeff in forum Market PlaceReplies: 0: 03-10-2004, 06:35 AM
By bluejeff in forum Chit-ChatReplies: 6: 03-02-2004, 08:01 PM